PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2018 | 77 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Morphometric analysis of the sella turcica in Turkish individuals with different dentofacial skeletal patterns

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphometric analysis of sella turcica in a Turkish population according to gender, age, and dentofacial skeletal type and to investigate the prevalence of sella turcica shapes in different dentofacial skeletal types. Materials and methods: The lateral cephalometric radiographs of 362 patients (145 males, 217 females) were included and grouped by age, gender, and dentofacial skeletal patterns. Linear dimensions of sella turcica, which include the length, height, and diameter, were measured, and the shapes of sella turcica were evaluated. Results: The anatomical variants of the sella turcica in this study were normal morphology (39.0%), followed by pyramidal shape (15.5%), double contour of floor (14.6%), oblique anterior wall (14.4%), irregular dorsum sella (8.6%), and sella turcica bridge (8.0%). Significant differences were found between sella turcica shapes and dentofacial skeletal types (p < 0.01). Females had greater diameter size of sella turcica than males (p < 0.01). In addition, the subjects in the 15–21 age group had larger sella turcica depths and diameters than the subjects in the 9–14 age group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). However, no significant differences were found between age groups in terms of sella turcica lengths (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Results from this study showed that the sample had a higher rate of morphological variation (39% normal, 61% other types) in comparison with other populations or ethnic groups. The class III patients had more irregularity (notching) types in the posterior part of the dorsum sella and fewer oblique anterior wall types than the others. Linear dimensions and morphological types of sella turcica in this study can be used as reference for additional investigators, such as radiologists, orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and neurosurgeons, to interpret and plan surgical procedures involving the sellar region. (Folia Morphol 2018; 77, 3: 543–550)

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

77

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.543–550,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey

Bibliografia

  • 1. Abdel-Kader HM. Sella turcica bridges in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. A retrospective cephalometric study. Aust Orthod J. 2007; 23(1): 30–35, indexed in Pubmed: 17679532.
  • 2. Abu Ghaida JH, Mistareehi AJ, Mustafa AG, et al. The normal dimensions of the sella turcica in Jordanians: a study on lateral cephalograms. Folia Morphol. 2017; 76(1): 1–9, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0038, indexed in Pubmed: 27830892.
  • 3. Alkofide EA. Sella turcica morphology and dimensions in cleft subjects. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008; 45(6): 647–653, doi: 10.1597/07-058.1, indexed in Pubmed: 18956933.
  • 4. Alkofide EA. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(5): 457–463, doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm049, indexed in Pubmed: 17693429.
  • 5. Ammar A, Al-Sultan A, Al Mulhim F, et al. Empty sella syndrome: does it exist in children? J Neurosurg. 1999; 91(6): 960–963, doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.6.0960, indexed in Pubmed: 10584841.
  • 6. Argyropoulou M, Perignon F, Brunelle F, et al. Height of normal pituitary gland as a function of age evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol. 1991; 21(4): 247–249, indexed in Pubmed: 1870916.
  • 7. Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica in Williams syndrome. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(6): 613–621, doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.6.613, indexed in Pubmed: 15650071.
  • 8. Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(6): 597–604, doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.6.597, indexed in Pubmed: 15650069.
  • 9. Baleriaux D, Jacquemin C, Lemort M. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland and the sella turcica region. Normal and pathological aspect]. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 1990; 51(3-4): 173–180, indexed in Pubmed: 2291633.
  • 10. Becktor JP, Einersen S, Kjaer I. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with severe craniofacial deviations. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22(1): 69–74, indexed in Pubmed: 10721247.
  • 11. Camp JD. Normal and pathological anatomy of the sella turcica as revealed by roentgenograms. Am J Roentgenol. 1924; 12: 143–56.
  • 12. Canigur Bavbek N, Dincer M. Dimensions and morphologic variations of sella turcica in type 1 diabetic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 145(2): 179–187, doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.011, indexed in Pubmed: 24485732.
  • 13. Chauhan P, Kalra S, Mongia S, et al. Morphometric analysis of sella turcica in North Indian population: a radiological study. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014; 2(2): 521, doi: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20140529.
  • 14. Choi WJ, Hwang EH, Lee SR. The study of shape and size of normal sella turcica in cephalometric radiographs. Korean J Oral Maxillofacial Radiol. 2001; 31(1): 43–49.
  • 15. Dostálová S, Sonka K, Smahel Z, et al. Cephalometric assessment of cranial abnormalities in patients with acromegaly. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003; 31(2): 80–87, indexed in Pubmed: 12628596.
  • 16. Jones RM, Faqir A, Millett DT, et al. Bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in subjects treated by surgical-orthodontic means or orthodontics only. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(5): 714–718, doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[714:BADOST]2.0.CO;2, indexed in Pubmed: 16279819.
  • 17. Kantor ML, Norton LA. Normal radiographic anatomy and common anomalies seen in cephalometric films. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 91(5): 414–426, indexed in Pubmed: 3554978.
  • 18. Kisling E. Cranial morphology in Down’s syndrome: A comparative roentgenencephalometric study in adult males. Munksgaard. 1966.
  • 19. Kjaer I, Hansen N, Becktor KB, et al. Craniofacial morphology, dentition, and skeletal maturity in four siblings with Seckel syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001; 38(6): 645–651, doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0645_cmdasm_2.0.co_2, indexed in Pubmed: 11681999.
  • 20. Konwar SK, Singhla A, Bayan R. Morphological (Length, Depth, and Diameter) Study of Sella Turcica in Different Mandibular Growth Patterns in Indians IJDMS. 2016; 3(3): 1–7.
  • 21. Korayem M, AlKofide E. Size and shape of the sella turcica in subjects with Down syndrome. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015; 18(1): 43–50.
  • 22. Kucia A, Jankowski T, Siewniak M, et al. Sella turcica anomalies on lateral cephalometric radiographs of Polish children. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014; 43(8): 20140165, doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140165, indexed in Pubmed: 25182120.
  • 23. Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, et al. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with dental anomalies. Eur J Orthod. 2006; 28(6): 580–585, doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl032, indexed in Pubmed: 16954179.
  • 24. Luong HM, Ahn JH, Bollu P, et al. Sella Turcica Variations in Skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Adult Subjects: A CBCT Study. J Dent Oral Biol. 2016; 1(3): 1015–1021.
  • 25. Marşan G, Öztaş E. Incidence of bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in Class I and III Turkish adult female patients. World J Orthod. 2009; 10(2): 99–103, indexed in Pubmed: 19582250.
  • 26. Melsen B, Melsen F. The postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material. Am J Orthod. 1982; 82(4): 329–342, indexed in Pubmed: 6961805.
  • 27. Meyer-Marcotty P, Reuther T, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Bridging of the sella turcica in skeletal Class III subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32(2): 148–153, doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp081, indexed in Pubmed: 19752019.
  • 28. Moffitt AH. Discovery of pathologies by orthodontists on lateral cephalograms. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(1): 58–63, doi: 10.2319/040510-190.1, indexed in Pubmed: 20936955.
  • 29. Pisaneschi M, Kapoor G. Imaging the sella and parasellar region. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2005; 15(1): 203–219, doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2005.02.007, indexed in Pubmed: 15927868.
  • 30. Preston CB. Pituitary fossa size and facial type. Am J Orthod. 1979; 75(3): 259–263, indexed in Pubmed: 285608.
  • 31. Russell BG, Kjaer I. Postnatal structure of the sella turcica in Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1999; 87(2): 183–188, indexed in Pubmed: 10533034.
  • 32. Sakran AM, Khan MA, Altaf FMN, et al. et al.. A morphometric study of the sella turcica: gender effect. Int J Anat Res. 2015; 3(1): 927–934.
  • 33. Sari S, Sari E, Akgun V, et al. Measures of pituitary gland and stalk: from neonate to adolescence. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 27(11-12): 1071–1076, doi: 10.1515/jpem-2014-0054, indexed in Pubmed: 25367689.
  • 34. Sathyanarayana HP, Kailasam V, Chitharanjan AB. Sella turcica-Its importance in orthodontics and craniofacial morphology. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013; 10(5): 571–575, indexed in Pubmed: 24348611.
  • 35. Shah AM, Bashir U, Ilyas T. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, II and III in patients presenting at Islamic International Dental Hospital, Islamabad. PODJ. 2011; 31(1).
  • 36. Silverman FN. Roentgen standards fo-size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1957; 78(3): 451–460, indexed in Pubmed: 13458563.
  • 37. Skrzat J, Kozerska M, Wróbel A. Micro-computed tomography study of the abnormal osseous extensions of sella turcica. Folia Morphol. 2014; 73(1): 19–23, doi: 10.5603/FM.2014.0003, indexed in Pubmed: 24590518.
  • 38. Soaker PC, Nawale S. The comparative study of size of sella turcica in different skeletal types in local population: an in vitro study. Indian J Appl Res. 2014; 4: 160–162.
  • 39. Tetradis S, Kantor ML. Prevalence of skeletal and dental anomalies and normal variants seen in cephalometric and other radiographs of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116(5): 572–577, indexed in Pubmed: 10547519.
  • 40. Valizadeh S, Shahbeig S, Mohseni S, et al. Correlation of shape and size of sella turcica with the type of facial skeletal class in an iranian group. Iran J Radiol. 2015; 12(3): e16059, doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.12(3)2015.16059, indexed in Pubmed: 26557271.
  • 41. Venieratos D, Anagnostopoulou S, Garidou A. A new morphometric method for the sella turcica and the hypophyseal fossa and its clinical relevance. Folia Morphol. 2005; 64(4): 240–247, indexed in Pubmed: 16425149.
  • 42. Wang J, Wang R, Lu Y, et al. Anatomical analysis on the lateral bone window of the sella turcica: a study on 530 adult dry skull base specimens. Int J Med Sci. 2014; 11(2): 134–141, doi: 10.7150/ijms.7137, indexed in Pubmed: 24465158.
  • 43. Weisberg LA, Zimmerman EA, Frantz AG. Diagnosis and evaluation of patients with an enlarged sella turcica. Am J Med. 1976; 61(5): 590–596, indexed in Pubmed: 984063.
  • 44. Yasa Y, Ocak A, Bayrakdar IS, et al. Morphometric analysis of sella turcica using cone beam computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 28(1): e70–e74, doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003223, indexed in Pubmed: 27922970.
  • 45. Zagga AD, Ahmed H, Tadros AA, et al. Description of the normal variants of the anatomical shapes of the sella turcica using plain radiographs: experience from Sokoto, Northwestern Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2008; 7(2): 77–81, indexed in Pubmed: 19143164.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-2f6aead3-d783-44d3-94fc-c6997fcdd561
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.