Molecular analysis of Sorbus sp. from the Pieniny Mts. and its relation to other sorbus species

• Autorzy: Dluzewska J. , Slezak I. , Kruk J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The systematic position of Sorbus population occurring in the Pieniny Mts. is controversial. To verify its taxonomic status we studied the ITS sequence of closely related species of the S. aria group: Sorbus sp. from the Pieniny Mts., S. aria from the Tatra Mts., S. graeca from the Balkans, and other well-distinguished native Polish Sorbus species (S. aria, S. aucuparia, S. intermedia and S. torminalis). As a reference we examined Sorbus populations closest to the Pieniny Mts. where S. graeca was reported to occur, in Slovakia. The results indicate that the Sorbus plants found in the Pieniny Mts. differ genetically from those in the Tatra Mts. but are identical to those collected from the Vihorlat Mts. in Slovakia and are closely related to S. graeca from the Balkans.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Pieniny Mountains; Sorbus; Rosaceae; molecular analysis; internal transcribed spacer

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.86-92,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Dluzewska J.

• Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Cracow, Poland

autor

Slezak I.

• The Franciszek Gorski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek 21, 30-239 Cracow, Poland
• Department of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Kruk J.

• Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Cracow, Poland

Bibliografia

• AJANI Y, AJANI A, CORDES JM, WATSON MF, and DOWNIE SR. 2008. Phylogenetic analysis of nrDNA ITS sequencesreveals relationships within five groups of IranianApiaceae subfamily Apioideae. Taxon 57: 383–401.
• ALDASORO JJ, AEDO C, GARMENDIA FM, DE LA HOZ FP, and NAVARRO C. 2004. Revision of Sorbus subgenera Aria andTorminaria (Rosaceae-Maloideae). Systematic BotanyMonographs 69: 1–149.
• ÁLVAREZ I, and WENDEL JF. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. MolecularPhylogenetics and Evolution 29: 417–434.
• BALDWIN BG, SANDERSON MJ, PORTER JM, WOJCIECHOWSKI MF, CAMPBELL CS, and DONOGHUE MJ. 1995. The ITS regionof nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidenceon angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the MissouriBotanical Garden 82: 247–277.
• CAMPBELL CS, EVANS RC, MORGAN DR, DICKINSON TA, and ARSENAULT MP. 2007. Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): Limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 119–145.
• CHESTER M, COWAN RS, FAY MF, and RICH TCG. 2007. Parentage of endemic Sorbus L. (Rosaceae) species in theBritish Ilses: evidence from plastid DNA. BotanicalJournal of the Linnean Society 154: 291–304.
• FELINER GN, and ROSSELLÓ JA. 2007. Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITSin species-level evolutionary studies in plants. MolecularPhylogenetics and Evolution 44: 911–919.
• FELSENSTEIN J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.
• GABRIELIAN E. 1976. On Sorbus graeca (Spach) Schauer found in Poland. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica22: 427–434.
• GERNANDT DS, LISTON A, and PIŃERO D. 2001. Variation in the nrDNA ITS of Pinus subsection Cembroides: implicationsfor molecular systematic studies of pine speciescomplexes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21:449–467.
• HEUPLER H, and MUER T. 2007. Bildatlas der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Ulmer Verlag. JANKUN A. 1993. Znaczenie apomiksji w ewolucji rodzaju Sorbus (Rosaceae). Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 38: 627–686.
• Li QY, Guo W, Liao WB, Macklin JA, and Li JH. 2012. Generic limits of Pyrinae: insight from nuclear ribosomal DNAsequences. Botanical Studies 53: 151–164.
• MAJOVSKY J. 1992. Sorbus L. emend. Crantz, Jarabina. In: Bertova L [ed.], Flora Slovenska. Vol. IV/3, 401–446.VEDA, Bratislava.
• MCALLISTER H. 2005. The Genus Sorbus: Mountain Ash and Other Rowans. Richmond, Surrey, UK: Royal BotanicGardens, Kew.
• NELSON-JONES EB, BRIGGS D, and SMITH AG. 2002. The origin of intermediate species of the genus Sorbus. Theoreticaland Applied Genetics 105: 953–963.
• PAWŁOWSKA S, and PAWŁOWSKI B. 1970. O kilku roślinach w polskiej części Karpat dotąd nie znanych lubniepewnych. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 16:295–305.
• PHIPPS JB, ROBERTSON KR, SMITH PG, and ROHRER JR. 1990. A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae).Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 2209–2269.
• POTTER D, ERIKSSON T, EVANS RC, OH S-H, SMEDMARK JEE, MORGAN DR, KERR MS, and CAMPBELL CS. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 5–43.
• ROBERTSON KR, PHIPPS JB, ROHRER JR, and SMITH PG. 1991. A synopsis of genera in Maloideae (Rosaceae).Systematic Botany 16: 376–394.
• RUTKOWSKI L. 2011. Klucz do Oznaczania Roślin Naczyniowych Polski Niżowej. Wydawnictwa Naukowe PWN,Warszawa.
• STASZKIEWICZ J. 1997. Zmienność jarząbu mącznego – Sorbus aria, jarzabu greckiego – S. graeca, jarząbu austrackiego– S. austriaca (Rosaceae) i form pośrednich. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica Polonica Suppl 2: 109–118.
• TAMURA K. 1992. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. Molecular Biology andEvolution 9: 678–687.
• TAMURA K, PETERSON D, PETERSON N, STECHER G, NEI M, and KUMAR S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary geneticsanalysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance,and maximum parsimony methods. MolecularBiology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu