Response of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves to different leaf fertilizers under a semi-arid condition

• Autorzy: Dilek M. , Sabir A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Reakcja liści winorośli (Vitis vinifera L.) na różne nawozy dolistne w warunkach półpustynnych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Ever-increasing shortage in global agricultural water sources urged the researchers to investigate sustainable strategies for alleviating the negative effects of drought on plants in semi arid or arid regions. In this sense, foliar fertilization gained particular significance as it supports the plant to cope with water shortage. This study was conducted to investigate the leaf physiological response of the grapevine ‘Narince’ to various organic leaf fertilizers. Leaf protein content was also determined to compare treatment effects on nutritional value of grape leaves since the leaves of this cultivar are consumed in various ways. Both stomatal conductance, leaf chlorophyll and protein content increased in response to leaf fertilizers in varying degrees according to the products used. To illustrate, Herbagreen pulverization resulted in the highest stomatal conductance (gs) (324.7 mmol H₂O m- ² s -¹), and was followed by Cropset (323.5 mmol H₂O m- ² s - ¹) while the lowest gs value was obtained from control vines (295.4 mmol H₂O m- ² s - ¹). The highest chlorophyll and protein contents were obtained from ISR 2000 (32.9 mg kg- ¹) and Maxicrop (21.5%) treatments, respectively. Leaf chlorophyll content had a significant positive correlation with leaf protein content when all the observations were pooled. Therefore, the organic leaf fertilizers can be considered as a safe, sustainable and innovative strategies to support plants to cope with drought.

PL

Zwiększające się niedobory źródeł wody dla rolnictwa skłoniły badaczy do analizowania strategii zrównoważonych w celu zmniejszenia negatywnego wpływu suszy na rośliny w regionach półpustynnych lub pustynnych. W tym kontekście, nawożenie dolistne zyskało szczególne znaczenie, gdyż wspiera roślinę w radzeniu sobie z brakiem wody. W doświadczeniu badano reakcję fizjologiczną liści winorośli ‘Narince’ na różne organiczne nawozy dolistne. Określono też zawartość białka w liściach, aby porównać efekty zabiegów na wartość odżywczą liści winogron, gdyż liście tej odmiany są spożywane na różne sposoby. Przewodność szparkowa (gs) oraz zawartość chlorofilu i białka w liściach zwiększały się w reakcji na nawozy dolistne w różnym stopniu, w zależności od użytych produktów, np. sproszkowany Herbagreen dał najwyższy gs (324,7 mmol H₂O m-² s -¹), na drugim miejscu był Cropset (323,5 mmol H₂O m- ² s - ¹) natomiast najniższą wartość gs osiągnięto z kontrolnych winorośli (295,4 mmol H₂O m- ² s - ¹). Największą zawartość chlorofilu i białka osiągnięto, odpowiednio, z zabiegów ISR 2000 (32,9 mg kg- ¹) i Maxicrop (21,5%). Po zebraniu wszystkich danych okazało się, że zawartość chlorofilu w liściach była pozytywnie skorelowana z zawartością białka w liściach. Organiczne nawozy dolistne mogą więc być uważane za bezpieczne, zrównoważone i innowacyjne strategie wspierania roślin podczas suszy.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Hortorum Cultus
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 15
• Numer: 5
• Opis fizyczny: p.145-155,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Dilek M.

• Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey

autor

Sabir A.

• Horticulture Department, Agriculture Faculty, Selcuk University, 42075 Konya, Turkey

Bibliografia

• AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed. AOAC International, Maryland, USA.
• Botha, E.J., Zebarth, B.J., Leblon, B. (2006). Non-destructive estimation of potato leaf chlorophyll and protein contents from hyperspectral measurements using the PROSPECT radiative transfer model. Can. J. Plant Sci., 86, 279–291.
• Celik, H., Agaoglu, Y.S., Fidan, Y., Marasali, B., Soylemezoglu, C. (1998). General Viniculture. Sun Fidan A.S. Professional Books Series No. 1, 253, Ankara, pp, 1–253.
• Clement, C.R., Chavez, W.B., Gomes, J.B.M. (1988). Considerations on peach palm (Bactris gasipaes H.B.K.) as a heart-of-palm producer. Enc. Nacion. Pesquis. Palm., 1, 225–247 (in Portoghese).
• Düring, H., Loveys, B.R. (1996). Stomatal patchiness of field-grown Sultana leaves: Diurnal changes and light effects. Vitis, 35, 7–10.
• Gonzalez-Dugo, M., Moran, M., Mateos, L. (2005). Canopy temperature variability as an indicator of crop water stress severity. Irrig. Sci., DOI 10.1007/s00271-005-0023-7.
• Greer, D.H. (2012). Modelling leaf photosynthetic and transpiration temperature-dependent responses in Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon grapevines growing in hot, irrigated vineyard conditions. AoB Plants, DOI:10.1093/aobpla/pls009.
• Hirayama, M., Wada, Y., Nemoto, H. (2006). Estimation of drought tolerance based on leaf temperature in upland rice breeding. Breed. Sci., 56, 47–54.
• Hussein, M.M., Mehanna, H.M., El-Lethy, S.M. (2013). Water deficit and foliar fertilization and their effect on growth and photosynthetic pigments of Jatropha plants. World Appl. Sci. J., 27, 454–461.
• Johnson, D.M., Woodruff, D.R., Mcculloh, K.A., Meinzer, F.C. (2009). Leaf hydraulic conductance, measured in situ, declines and recovers daily: leaf hydraulics, water potential and stomatal conductance in four temperate and three tropical tree species. Tree Physiol., 29, 879–887.
• Kapotis, G., Zervoudakis, G., Veltsistas, T., Salahas, G. (2003). Comparison of chlorophyll meter readings with leaf chlorophyll concentration in Amaranthus vlitus: Correlation with physiological processes. Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 50, 395.
• Kara, Z., Sabir, A. (2010). Effects of HerbaGreen application on vegetative developments of some grapevine rootstocks during nursery propagation in glasshouse. In 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8–9, Sarajevo, 127–132.
• Larsen, F.E., Higgins, S.S., Wir, A.A. (1989). Diurnal water relations of apple, apricot, grape, olive and peach in an arid environment (Jordan). Sci. Hort., 39, 211–222.
• Liu, F., Stutzel, H. (2002). Leaf expansion, stomatal conductance, and transpiration of vegetable Amaranth (Amaranthus sp.) in response to soil drying. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 127, 878–883.
• Matsumoto, K., Ohta, T., Tanaka, T. (2005). Dependence of stomatal conductance on leaf chlorophyll concentration and meteorological variables. Agr. For. Meteorol., 132, 44–57
• Miranda, T., Ebner, M., Traiser, C., Roth-Nebelsick, A. (2013). Diurnal pattern of stomatal conductance in the large-leaved temperate liana Aristolochia macrophylla depends on spatial position within the leaf lamina. Ann. Bot., 111, 905–915.
• Mora-Urpí, J., Weber, J.C., Clement, C.R. (1997). Peach Palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth): Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized Crops. – Inst. Plant Genetics Crop Plant Resorces, Rome.
• Murtezaoglu, C. (2006). Physicochemical and in vitro hypoglychemic characteristics of fiber rich fractions of brined-vine leaves. Istanbul Tech. Univ., Graduate School Sci. Engin. Technol., M. Sc. Thesis, 51 p.
• Papasavvas, A., Triantafyllidis, V., Zervoudakis, G., Kapotis, G., Samaras, Y., Salahas, G., (2008). Correlation of SPAD-502 meter readings with physiological parameters and leaf nitrate content in Beta vulgaris. J. Environ. Protec. Ecol., 9, 351–356.
• Paranychianakis, N.V., Chartzoulakis, K.S., Angelakis, A.N. (2004). Influence of rootstock, irrigation level and recycled water on water relations and leaf gas exchange of Soultanina grapevines. Environ. Exp. Bot., 52, 185–198.
• Rogiers, S.Y., Greer, D.H., Hatfield, J.M., Hutton, R.J., Clarke, H.S. (2011). Stomatal response of an anisohydric grapevine cultivar to evaporative demand, available soil moisture and abscisic acid. Tree Physiol., 32, 249–261.
• Sabir, A. (2016). Physiological and morphological responses of grapevıne (V vinifera L. cv. ‘Italiaʼ) leaf to water deficit under different rootstock effects. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 15, 135–148.
• Sabir, A., Yazar, K. (2015). Diurnal dynamics of stomatal conductance and leaf temperature of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) in response to daily climatic variables. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 14, 3–15.
• Sat, I.G., Sengul, M., Keles, F. (2002). Use of grape leaves in canned food. Pak. J. Nutr., 1, 257–262.
• Stavrinides, M.C., Daane, K.M., Lampinen, B.D., Mills, N.J. (2010). Plant water stress, leaf temperature, and spider mite (Acari: Tatranychidae) outbreaks in California vineyards. Environ. Entomol., 39, 1232–1241.
• TSMS (2016). Turkish State Meteorological Service. http://www.mgm.gov.tr.
• Zsófi, Z., Villangó, Sz., Pálfi, Z., Tóth, E., Bálo, B. (2014). Texture characteristics of the grape berry skin and seed (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Kékfrankos) under postveraison water deficit. Sci. Horticult., 172, 9, 176–182.
• Zufferey, V., Cochard, H., Ameglio, T., Spring, J.L., Viret, O. (2011). Diurnal cycles of embolism formation and repair in petioles of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas). J. Exp. Bot., DOI:10.1093/jxb/err081.
• Zweifel, R., Steppe, K., Sterck, F.J. (2007). Stomatal regulation by microclimate and tree water relations: interpreting eco-physiological field data with a hydraulic plant model. J. Exp. Bot., 58, 2113–2131.