PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2017 | 24 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Influence of mineral fertilisation on the yield and macroelement content in sugar beet

Autorzy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

PL
Oddziaływanie nawożenia mineralnego na plonowanie i zawartość makroskładników w buraku cukrowym

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of mineral NPK, Mg and micronutrient fertilisation on the content of macroelements and root yield of a sugar beet cultivar called Khazar. The effects of three fertilisation levels were assessed. Additionally, the highest NPK dose was analysed in treatments with NPK + Mg and micronutrients (B, Cu, Zn, Mn). The increasing level of NPK fertilisation as well as the nutrition with magnesium and micronutrients caused an increase in root yield. The highest yield of roots was achieved by beet plants fertilised with the high NPK dose combined with magnesium, boron, copper and zinc. It was demonstrated that roots fertilised with the 3NPK dose and magnesium tended to accumulate more N-total. At the same time, the applied micronutrients contributed to a decline in the N-total content of dry matter in roots. The analysed fertilisation with NPK and micronutrients did not affect the content of phosphorus, potassium and calcium in either of the two beet organs. In general, beet leaves were characterised by higher concentrations of nutrients than roots.
PL
Przedmiotem badań było określenie wpływu nawożenia mineralnego NPK, Mg i mikroelementów na plonowanie buraka cukrowego oraz na zawartość w obu organach tej rośliny tj. w korzeniach i liściach – makroskładników. Do badań wybrano odmianę Khazar. Oceniono efekty trzech poziomów nawożenia NPK. Dodatkowo na tle najwyższej dawki NPK zastosowano magnez oraz mikroelementy – B, Cu, Zn i Mn. Wzrastające nawożenie NPK, jak też nawożenie magnezem i mikroelementami powodowało przyrost plonu korzeni. Najwyższy ich plon otrzymano w obiekcie nawożonym wysoką dawką NPK wraz z magnezem, borem, miedzią i cynkiem. Wykazano tendencję do większej akumulacji N-ogólnego w korzeniach nawożonych dawką 3NPK oraz magnezem. Mikroelementy przyczyniły się do obniżenia zawartości azotu ogólnego w suchej masie korzeni. Rozpatrywane nawożenie NPK i mikroskładnikami nie wpłynęło na zawartość fosforu, potasu i wapnia w obu organach buraka. Ogólnie liście charakteryzowały się większymi zawartościami składników pokarmowych niż korzenie.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

24

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.221-237,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

Bibliografia

  • Abdallah A., Mekdad A., 2015. Sugar beet productivity as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and foliar spraying with boron. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 4(4), 181-196.
  • Abdel-Motagally F.M.F., Attia K.K., 2009. Response of sugar beet plants to nitrogen and potassium fertilization in sandy calcareous soil. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 11, 695-700.
  • Abdelaal K.A.A., Sahar F.T., 2015. Response of sugar beet plant (Beta vulgaris L.) to mineral nitrogen fertilization and bio-fertilizers. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 4(9), 677-688.
  • Barłóg P., Grzebisz W., Paradowski A., 2002. Effect of potassium, sodium and magnesium fertilization on yielding of three sugar beet varieties. Part II. Content and uptake of macronutrients. Biul. IHAR., 222, 127-133.
  • Barłóg P., Grzebisz W., Pepliński K., Szczepaniak W., 2013b. Sugar beet response to balanced nitrogenfertilization with phosphorus and potassium. Part I. Dynamics of beet yield development. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 19, 1311-1318.
  • Barłóg P., Nowacka A., Błaszyk R., 2016. Effect of zinc band application on sugar beet yield, quality and nutrient uptake. Plant Soil Environ., 62(1), 30-35, doi: 10.17221/677/2015-PSE
  • Barłóg P., Szczepaniak W., Grzebisz W., 2013a. Reaction of sugar beet to the dose and type of sodium fertilizers on the background of manure application. Part II. Content and uptake of nutrients (in Polish). Fragm. Agron., 30(3), 35-45.
  • Bieniaszewski T., 1999. The chemical composition of sugar beet resulting from different NPK fertilization periods and doses (in Polish). Biul. Nauk., 5, 83-97.
  • Borówczak F., Grobelny M., Kołata M., Zieliński T., 2006. The influence of nitrogen fertilization on yields and quality of sugar beet roots (in Polish). J. Res. Appl. Agric. Engng., 51(3),11-15.
  • Buraczyńska D., 2005. The content of dry matter and macroelements in the roots and leaves of sugar beet under the influence of organic and mineral fertilization (in Polish). Annales UMCS, Sec. E., 60, 19-31.
  • Buraczyńska D., Ceglarek F., Płaza A., 2002. The role of differentiated organic fertilization in sugar beet cultivation in the environment of central-eastern Poland. Part III. Content of dry matter and macronutrients in roots and leaves of sugar beet (in Polish). Roczn. Nauk. Roln. Seria A., 116, 75-88.
  • Chwil S., Szewczuk C., 2003. Influence of sugar beet foliage feeding on yield and some qualitative traits (in Polish). Acta Agroph., 85,117-124.
  • Czuba R., 1993. Regeneration of soil strongly exhausted from nutrients (in Polish). Roczn. Gleb., 44(1/2), 57-64.
  • Czuba R., 1996. Mineral fertilization of crops. Red. R. Czuba. Police. Dewdar M.D.H., Abbas M.S., 2015. Influence of time addition and rates of boron foliar application on growth, quality and yield traits of sugar beet. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 4(2), 231-238.
  • Gawrońska-Kulesza A., Lenart S., Suwara I., Brogowski Z., Kwapisz J., 1999. Biomass, chemical composition and ionic balance in separate growth phases of sugar beet. Part I. Biomass and chemical composition (in Polish). Roczn. Nauk. Roln. Seria A., 114(1-2), 55-68.
  • Grzebisz W., Pepliński K., Szczepaniak W., Barłóg P., Cyna K., 2012. Impact of nitrogen concentration variability in sugar beet plant organs throughout the growing season on dry matter accumulation patterns. J. Elem., 17(3), 389-407, doi: 10.5601/jelem.2012.17.3.03 236 K. GRZEGORZEWSKI et al.
  • Grzyś E., 2004. The role and importance of micronutrients in plants’ nutrition (in Polish). Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 502, 89-99.
  • Gutmański I., 1991. Sugar beet production. Group work (in Polish). PWRiL Poznań., 220, 232-235. Górski D., 2009. Effect of macro- and micronutrients content in sugar beet leaves and of weather conditions on infection by Cercospora Beticola Sacc (in Polish). Prog. Plant Prot., 49(3), 1264-1267.
  • Hellal F.A., Taalab A.S., Safaa A.M., 2009. Influence of nitrogen and boron nutrition on nutrient balance and sugar beet yield grown in calcareous soil. Ozean J. Applied Sci., 2(1), 1-10.
  • Kenter Ch., Hoffmann C., Maerlaender B., 2006. Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris L.). Eur. J. Agron., 24, 62-69.
  • Kopcewicz J., Lewak S., 2002. Plant physiology (in Polish). PWN, Warsaw. Kurus J., 2006. Content of some nutrients and mineral components in sugar beet depending on nitrogen fertilization and methods of weed control (in Polish). Acta Agroph., 8(3), 671-680.
  • Michalska-Klimczak B., Wyszyński Z., 2010. Sugar beet yielding in various agronomical and environmental conditions. Part 1. Yield and root quality vs. technological sugar yield (in Polish). Fragm. Agron., 27(1), 88-97.
  • Nowakowki M., 1998. Effect of different nitrogen fertilization techniques on yield and processing quality of sugar beet (in Polish). Roczn. AR Poznań, Rolnictwo, 307(52), 167-173 Ostrowska D., Kucińska K., 1998. Sugar beet yield and quality as related to increasing rates of mineral nitrogen and differentiated organic fertilizer application (in Polish). Roczn. AR Poznań, Rolnictwo, 307(52), 273-278.
  • Wróbel S., 1996. Effect of micronutrient fertilization on yield and chemical composition of sugar beet cultivated without manuring (in Polish). Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin 434, 139-143.
  • Wróbel S., 1997 Effect of micronutrient fertilization on yield and chemical composition of sugar beet in Polish). Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin 202, 193-196.
  • Wróbel S., Domaradzki K., 2006. Effect of combined foliar application of boron and manganese with herbicide on yield and chemical composition of sugar beet (in Polish). Pam. Puł., 142, 585-593.
  • Wyszyński Z., Kalinowska-Zdun M, Roszkowska B., Laudański Z., Gozdowski D., 2002. Yields and quality of sugar beet roots on production plantations in dependence on mineral fertilization, pH and contents of available soil phosphorus and potassium (in Polish). Biul. IHAR., 222, 231-238.
  • Zimny L. Kuc P., 2005. The content of basic mineral components in sugar beet growing in the second crop rotation under varying systems of fertilization (in Polish). Annales UMCS., Sec. E., 60, 185-194.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-28cb4384-8341-4193-a55d-4e7628c0b391
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.