Pterofagia oraz kanibalizm jako następstwa obniżonego poziomu dobrostanu u drobiu

• Autorzy: Urban-Chmiel R.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Feather pecking and cannibalism - the consequences of reduced welfare in poultry

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

PL

drob; chow zwierzat; dobrostan zwierzat; zachowanie sie zwierzat; pogorszenie dobrostanu; zaburzenia zachowania; pterofagia; kanibalizm; przyczyny; czynniki genetyczne; czynniki srodowiska; warunki utrzymania zwierzat; bledy zywieniowe; pasozyty zwierzat; zapobieganie

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Życie Weterynaryjne
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 89
• Numer: 09
• Opis fizyczny: s.756-759,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Urban-Chmiel R.

• Zakład Prewencji Weterynaryjnej i Chorób Ptaków, Instytut Biologicznych Podstaw Chorób Zwierząt, Wydział Medycyny Weterynaryjnej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, Lublin

Bibliografia

• 1. Rodenburg T.B., de Haas E.N.,, Nielsen B.L., Buitenhuis A.J.: Fearfulness and feather damage in laying hens divergentlyselected for high and low feather pecking. AppliedAnim. Behav. Sci. 2010, 128, 91–96.
• 2. Hartini S., Choct M.: Effect of mash dietary fiber on performance and cannibalism in laying hens. J. IndonesianTrop. Anim. Agric. 2011, 36, 50–54.
• 3. Appleby M.C., Hughes B.O.: Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physicaland behavioural aspects. World Poultry Sci. J. 1991, 47,109–128.
• 4. Hallas A.E.: Are Your Birds Hen-Pecked? Pecking and Cannibalism in Poultry. 2011 http://www.poultryhub.org/index.php/Minimising_cannibalism_using_innovative_beak_trimming_methods
• 5. Cloutier S., Newberry R.C., Honda K., Alldredge, J.R.: Cannibalistic behaviour spread by social learning. Anim.Behav. 2002, 63, 1153–1162.
• 6. Scheideler S.E., Shield S.: Cannibalism by Poultry. Neb- Guide G1670, 2007, http://www.ianrpubs.unl.edu/pages/publicationD.jsp?publicationId=731
• 7. Choct M., Hartini S.: Interaction between nutrition and cannibalism in laying hens. Recent Adv. Anim. Nutr. Australia,2003, 14, 157–162.
• 8. Craig J.V., Lee H.Y.: Beak trimming and genetic stock effects on behavior and mortality from cannibalism in whiteleghorn-type pullets. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1990, 25,107–123.
• 9. Tablante N.L, Vaillancourt J.P., Martin S.W., Shoukri M., Estevez I.: Spatial Distribution of Cannibalism Mortalitiesin Commercial Laying Hens. Poultry Sci. 2000, 79,705–708.
• 10. Bright A.: Plumage colour and feather pecking in laying hens, a chicken perspective? Br. Poultry Sci. 2007, 48,253–263.
• 11. Rodenburg T.B., Komen H., Ellen D.E., Uitdehaag K.A., van Arendonk J.A.: Selection method and early life historyaffect behavioural development, feather pecking andcannibalism in laying hens: a review. Applied Anim. Behav.Sci. 2008, 110, 217–228.
• 12. Jensen P., Keeling L., Schütz K., Andersson L., Kerje S., Carlborg Ö., Jacobson L.: Feather pecking in poultry –phenotypic correlations and QTL-analysis in F2-intercross between red jungle fowl and white leghorn layers. Proc. 37th ISAE Int. Cong. Fondazione Iniziative Zooprofilattiche e Zootecniche, Brescia, Abano TermeItaly, June 24–28, 2003, s. 68–69.
• 13. Jensen P., Keeling L., Schütz K., Andersson L., Mormede P., Brändström H., Forkman B., Kerje S., FredrikssonR., Ohlsson C., Larsson S., Mallmin H. Kindmark A.: Featherpecking in chickens is genetically related to behaviouraland developmental traits. Physiol. Behav. 2005,86, 52–60.
• 14. Wysocki M., Bessei W., Kjaer J.B. Bennewitz J.: Genetic and physiological factors influencing feather pecking inchickens. World’s Poultry Sci. J. 2010, 66, 659–672.
• 15. Kjaer J.B., Sørensen P.: Feather pecking behaviour in White Leghorns, a genetic study. Br. Poultry Sci. 1997, 38, 333–341.
• 16. Rodenburg T.B., Buitenhuis A.J., Ask B., Uitdehaag K.A., Koene, P. van der Poel J.J., Bovenhuis H.: Heritability ofFeather Pecking and Open-Field Response of Laying Hensat Two Different Ages. Poultry Sci. 2003, 82, 861–867
• 17. Flisikowski K., Schwarzenbacher H., Wysocki M., Weigend S., Preisinger R., Kjaer J.B., Fries R.: Variation inneighbouring genes of the dopaminergic and serotonergicsystems affects feather pecking behaviour of laying hens. Anim. Genet. 2009, 40, 192–99.
• 18. Van Hierden Y.M., Korte S.M., Ruesink E.W., Van Reenen C.G., Engel B., Kortebouws G.A., Koolhaas J.M., BlokhuisH.J.: Adrenocortical reactivity and centralserotonin anddopamine turnover in young chicks from a high and lowfeather-pecking line of laying hens. Physiol. Behav. 2002,75, 653–659.
• 19. Wang L., Erlandsen H., Haavik J., Knappskog P.M., Stevens R.C.: Three-Dimensional Structure of Human TryptophanHydroxylase and Its Implications for the Biosynthesisof the Neurotransmitters Serotonin and Melatonin.Biochemistry 2002, 41, 12749–54.
• 20. Dennis R.L., Fahey A.G., Cheng H.W.: Infrared beak treatment method compared with conventional hot-bladetrimming in laying hens. Poultry Sci. 2009, 88, 38–43.
• 21. Ambrosen T., Petersen V.E.: The Influence of Protein Level in the Diet on Cannibalism and Quality of Plumage ofLayers. Poultry Sci. 1997, 76, 559–563.
• 22. Steenfeldt S., Kjaer J.B., Engberge R.M.: Effect of feeding silages or carrots as supplements to laying hens on productionperformance, nutrient digestibility, gut structure,gut microflora and feather pecking behaviour. Br. PoultrySci. 2007, 48, 454–468.
• 23. van Krimpen M.M., Kwakkel R.P., Reuvekamp B.F.J., van Peet-Schwering C.M.C., den Hartog, L.A., Verstegen,M.W.A.: Impact of feeding management on feather peckingin laying hens. World’s Poultry Sci. J. 2005, 61,663–686.
• 24. Wauters, A.M., Richard-Yris, M.A., Talec, N.: Maternal influences on feeding and general activity in domesticchicks. Ethology 2002, 108, 529–540.
• 25. North M. O., Bell D.D.: Commercial Chicken Production Manual.4th ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY1990, pp. 419.
• 26. Dyrektywa Rady 1999/74/EC z dnia 19 lipca 1999 roku ustalająca minimalne standardy służące ochronie kur niosekOJ L 203, 3. 8. 1999, str. 53.
• 27. Riber, A.B., Wichman, A., Bjarne, O., Braastad, C., Forkman, B.: Effects of broody hens on perch use, ground pecking,feather pecking and cannibalism in domestic fowl(Gallus gallus domesticus). Applied Anim. Behav. Sci.2007, 106, 39–51.
• 28. Clauer P.J., Cannibalism: prevention and treatment. http://tilaok.blogspot.com/2009_03_01_archive.html, 2009.
• 29. Al-Rawi, B., Craig J.V.: Agonistic behavior of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird. Appl. Anim.Ethol. 1975, 2, 69–80.
• 30. Nicol C.J., Gregory N.G., Knowles T.G., Parkman I.D., Wilkins L.J.: Differential effects of increased stockingdensity,mediated by increased flock size, on feather peckingand aggression in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav.Sci. 1999, 65, 137–152.
• 31. Dyrektywa Rady 2007/43/WE z dnia 28 czerwca 2007 r.w sprawie ustanowienia minimalnych zasad dotyczących ochrony kurcząt utrzymywanych z przeznaczeniem na produkcję mięsa OJ L 182, 12.7.2007 str.19.