From otoacoustic emission to late auditory potentials P300: the inhibitory effect

• Autorzy: Schochat E. , Matas C. G. , Samelli A. G. , Carvallo R. M. M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study verifies the effects of contralateral noise on otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials. Short, middle and late auditory evoked potentials as well as otoacoustic emissions with and without white noise were assessed. Twenty-five subjects, normal-hearing, both genders, aged 18 to 30 years, were tested . In general, latencies of the various auditory potentials were increased at noise conditions, whereas amplitudes were diminished at noise conditions for short, middle and late latency responses combined in the same subject. The amplitude of otoacoustic emission decreased significantly in the condition with contralateral noise in comparison to the condition without noise. Our results indicate that most subjects presented different responses between conditions (with and without noise) in all tests, thereby suggesting that the efferent system was acting at both caudal and rostral portions of the auditory system.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 72
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.296-307,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Schochat E.

• School of Medicine, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil

autor

Matas C. G.

• School of Medicine, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil

autor

Samelli A. G.

• School of Medicine, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil

autor

Carvallo R. M. M.

• School of Medicine, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Bibliografia

• Agresti A (2002) Categorical Data Analysis (2nd edition). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. Andersen RA, Roth GL, Aitkin LM, Merzenich MM (1980) The efferent projections of the central nucleus and the pericentral nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the cat. J Comp Neurol 194: 649-662.
• Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Wen H, Szabo P, Cecola RP, Rigby P, Jackson DF (1993) Contralateral suppression of non-lin¬ear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 71: 1-11.
• Burkard R, Hecox K (1983) The effect of broadband noise on human brainstem auditory evoked response. J Acoust Soc Am 74: 1204-1213.
• Burkard RF, Sims D (2002) A comparison of the effects of broadband masking noise on the auditory brainstem response in young and old adults. Am J Audiol 11: 13-22.
• Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A (1990) Effects of contralateral auditory stim¬uli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 43: 251-262.
• Cone B (2009) Attention! A modulator of cochlear, brain¬stem and cortical evoked responses. In: XXI Biennial Symposium of the International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group (IERASG), Rio de Janeiro, 8-12 June 2009, p. 24.
• De Ceulaer G, Yperman M, Daemers K, Van Driessche K, Somers T, Offeciers FE, Govaerts PJ (2001) Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data for a clinical test set-up. Otol Neurotol 22: 350-355.
• Di Girolamo S, Napolitano B, Alessandrini M, Bruno E (2007) Experimental and clinical aspects of the efferent auditory system. Acta Neurochir Suppl 97: 419-424.
• Dobie RA, Berlin CI (1979) Binaural interaction in brain- stem-evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol 105: 391-398.
• Dobie RA, Norton SJ (1980) Binaural interaction in human auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 49: 303-313.
• Eisencraft T, Miranda MF, Schochat E (2006) Comparing middle latency response with and without music. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 72: 465-469.
• Galambos R (1956) Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to cochlea. J Neurophysiol 19: 424-437.
• Gao E, Suga N (2000) Experience-dependent plasticity in the auditory cortex and the inferior colliculus of bats: Role of the corticofugal system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 8081-8086.
• Garinis AC, Glattke T, Cone BK (2011) The MOC reflex during active listening to speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 54: 1464-1476.
• Giraud AL, Collet L, Chery-Croze S, Magnan J, Chays A (1996) Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in humans. Brain Res 705: 15-23.
• Gott PS, Hughes EC (1989) Effects of noise masking on the brain-stem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: Central and peripheral components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74: 131-138.
• Guinan JJ, Backus BC, Lilaonitkul W, Aharonson V (2003) Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4: 521-540.
• Guinan JJ Jr (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 27: 589-607
• Hackett TA (2007) Organization of the thalamocortical audi¬tory pathways in primates. In: Auditory Evoked Potentials: basic principles and clinical application (Burkard RF, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Eds). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
• Hall JW, Harvey AD (1985) The binaural masking level dif¬ference as a function of frequency, masker level and masking bandwidth in normal-hearing and hearing-im¬paired listeners. Audiology 24: 25-31.
• Harkrider AW, Smith SB (2005) Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of audi¬tory efferent activity. J Am Acad Audiol 16: 530¬545.
• Hecox KE, Patterson J, Birman M (1989) Effect of broad¬band noise on the human brain stem auditory evoked response. Ear Hear 10: 346-353.
• Hood LJ, Berlin CI, Hurley A, Ceccola RP, Bell B (1996) Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects. Hear Res 101: 113-118.
• Hosford HL, Fullerton BC, Levine RA (1979) Binaural interaction in human and cat brainstem auditory respons¬es. J Acoust Soc Am 65 (suppl 1): 86.
• Huffman RF, Henson OWJ (1990) The descending auditory pathway and acoustic motor systems: Connections with inferior colliculus. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 15: 295¬323.
• James AL, Mount RJ, Harrison RV (2002) Contralateral sup¬pression of DPOAE measured in real time. Clin Otolaryngol 27: 106-112.
• Khalfa S, Bougeard R, Morand N, Veuillet E, Isnard J, Guenot M, Ryvlin P, Fischer C, Collet L (2001) Evidence of peripheral auditory activity modulation by the auditory cortex in humans. Neuroscience 104: 347-358.
• Kral A, Eggermont JJ (2007) What's to lose and what's to learn: development under auditory deprivation, cochlear implants and limits of cortical plasticity. Brain Res Rev 56: 259-269.
• Kumar UA, Vanaja CS (2004) Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise. Ear Hear 25: 142-146.
• Lilaonitkul W, Guinan Jr JJ (2009) Reflex control of the human inner ear: a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking. J Neurophysiol 101: 1394-1406.
• Moller AR (2007) Neural generators for auditory brainstem evoked potentials. In: Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application (Burkard RF, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Eds). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
• Muchnik C, Roth DA, Othman-Jebara R, Putter-Katz H, Shabtai EL, Hildesheimer M (2004) Reduced medial olivocochlear bundle system function in children with auditory processing disorders. Audiol Neurootol 9: 107-114.
• Ozdamar O, Bohorquez J (2008) Suppression of the Pb (P1) component of the auditory middle latency response with contralateral masking. Clin Neurophysiol 119: 1870¬1880.
• Ozdamar O, Kraus N, Grossmann J (1986) Binaural interac¬tion in the auditory middle latency response of the guinea pig. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 63: 476-483.
• Perrot X, Ryvlin P, Isnard J, Guenot M, Catenoix H, Fischer C, Mauguiere F, Collet L (2006) Evidence for corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory activity in humans. Cereb Cortex 16: 941-948.
• Polich J, Howard L, Starr A (1985) Stimulus frequency and masking as determinants of P300 latency in event-related potentials from auditory stimuli. Biol Psychol 21: 309¬318.
• Polyakov A, Pratt H, Shi Y (1998) Evidence for efferent effects on early components of the human auditory brain- stem evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108: 543-553.
• Rasmussen GL (1946) The olivary peduncle and other fiber projections to the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol 84: 141-219.
• Rosenhamer. HJ, Holmkvist C (1983) Latencies of ABR (Waves III and V) to binaural clicks: effects of interaural time and intensity differences. Scand Audiol 12: 201-207.
• Ryan S, Kemp DT (1996) The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 94: 140-147.
• Salisbury DF, Desantis MA, Shenton ME, McCarley RW (2002) The effect of background noise on P300 to suprathreshold stimuli. J Psychophysiol 39: 111-115.
• Salo SK, Lang AH, Salmivalli AJ, Johansson RK, Peltola MS (2003) Contralateral white noise masking affects auditory N1 and P2 waves differently. J Psychophysiol 17: 189-194.
• Sanches SGG, Carvallo RM (2006) Contralateral suppres¬sion of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with auditory processing disorder. Audiol Neurotol 11:
• Suga N, Xiao Z, Ma X, Ji W (2002) Plasticity and corticofugal modulation for hearing in adult animals. Neuron 36: 9-18.
• Suga N, Ma X (2003) Multiparametric corticofugal modula¬tion and plasticity in the auditory system. Nature Rev 4: 783-794.
• Tomchik SM, Lu Z (2006) Modulation of auditory signal-to- noise ratios by efferent stimulation. J Neurophysiol 95: 3562-3570.
• Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R (1991) Effect of contralat¬eral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 65: 724-735.
• Veuillet E, Magnan A, Ecalle J, Thai-Van H, Collet L (2007) Auditory processing disorder in children with reading disabilities: effect of audiovisual training. Brain 130: 2915-2928.
• Veuillet E, Duverdy-Bertholon F, Collet L (1996) Effect of con¬tralateral acoustic stimulation on the growth of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 93: 128-135.
• Warr WB, Boche JB, Neely ST (1997) Efferent innervations of the hair cell region: origins and terminations of two lateral olivocochlear systems. Hear Res 108: 89-111.
• Weihing J, Musiek FE (2008) An electrophysiological mea¬sure of binaural hearing in noise. J Am Acad Audiol 19: 481-495.

Uwagi

Rekord w opracowaniu