The reproductive biology of selected taxa of the genus Cerasus Duham

• Autorzy: Chudikova R. , Durisova L. , Baranec T. , Jun. P. E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We used cytological and embryological methods to study reproductive cycle stages in Cerasus fruticosa Pall., Cerasus × eminens (Beck) Buia and Cerasus × mohacsyana (Kárpáti) Janchen from SW Slovakia, focusing on development of the male and female reproductive organs, fertilization processes and embryo formation. We found that reproductive potential was reduced by synergistic effects of negative biotic and abiotic factors. Despite the presence of degenerated, deformed pollen grains and their great variability of shape and size, a sufficient amount of normally developed viable pollen grains developed in anthers of C. fruticosa and C. × mohacsyana. Disturbed microsporogenesis in C. × eminens led to significantly lower production of viable pollen grains. We did not observe serious disturbances during megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis. Lower fruit set was caused by degeneration of ovules as a result of unsuccessful pollination, fertilization failure, or embryo degeneration during its initial development.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Cerasus; sour cherry; Cerasus fruticosa; reproductive biology; taxon; female gametophyte; pollen grain; embryo

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 54
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.11-20,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Chudikova R.

• Department of Botany, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia

autor

Durisova L.

autor

Baranec T.

autor

Jun. P. E.

Bibliografia

• ALBURQUERQUE N, BURGOS L, and EGEA J. 2002. Variability in the developmental stage of apricot ovules at anthesis andits relationship with fruit set. Annals of Applied Biology141: 147–152.
• ARBELOA A, and HERRERO M. 1991. Development of the ovular structures in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. NewPhytologist 118: 527–533.
• BARANEC T. 1996. Monitoring reprodukèného procesu niektorých ohrozených druhov drevín èe¾ade Rosaceae L.v Tríbèi. Rosalia 11: 55–64.
• BEPPU K, and KATAOKA I. 1999. High temperature rather than drought stress is responsible for the occurrence of doublepistils in "Satohnishiki" sweet cherry. ScientiaHorticulturae 81: 125–134.
• BORATYŃSKY A, LEWANDOWSKA A, and RATYŃSKA H. 2003. Cerasus fruticosa Pall. (Rosaceae) in the region ofKujavia and South Pomerania (N Poland).Dendrobiology 43: 3–13.
• BURGOS L, and EGEA J. 1993. Apricot embryo-sac development in relation to fruit set. Journal of HorticulturalScience & Biotechnology 68: 203–208.
• CEROVIĆ R, and MIĆIĆ N. 1999. Functionality of embryo sacs as related to their viability and fertilization success in sourcherry. Scientia Horticulturae 79: 227–235.
• CHRTEK J. 1992. Amygdalaceae D. Don. In: Hejný S, and Slavík B [ed.], Kvìtena ÈR 3, 442–448. Academia, Praha.
• DZHANGALIEV AD, SALOVA TN, and TUREKHANOVA PM. 2003. The wild fruit and nut plants of Kazakhstan. HorticulturalPreviews 29: 305–371.
• DITTMANN K, and STÖSSER R. 1999. Development of ovules in relation to premature fruit drop in Prunus-species.Journal of Applied Botany 73: 86–98.
• EGEA J, and BURGOS L. 1994. Year to year variation in the developmental stage of the embryo sac at anthesis inflowers of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Journal ofHorticultural Science 69: 315–318.
• ERDELSKÁ O. 1986. Embryo development in the dogwood Cornus mas. Phytomorphology 36: 23–28.
• ENGIN H, and ÜNAL A. 2008. Double fruit formation and the occurrence of two pistils: examination by scanning electronmicroscopy in sweet cherry. Acta Horticulturae(ISHS) 795: 651–654.
• FERÁKOVÁ V, MAGLOCKÝ Š, and MARHOLD K. 2001. Èervený zoznam papraïorastov a semenných rastlín. In: Baláž D, Marhold K, and Urban P [ed.], Èervený Zoznam Rastlína Živoèíchov Slovenska, 44–76. Ochrana Prírody, B.Bystrica.
• FURUKAWA Y, and BUKOVAC MJ. 1989. Embryo sac development in sour cherry during the pollination period as related to fruit set. Horticulturae Science 24: 1005–1008.
• HROTKÓ K, and FACSAR G. 1996. Taxonomic classification of Hungarian populations of Prunus fruticosa (Pall.)Woronow hybrids. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 410:495–498.
• GUITIÁN J, SÁNCHEZ JM, and GUITIÁN P. 1992. Fruit/flower ratio in Crataegus monogyna Jacq., Prunus mahaleb L.and Prunus spinosa L. Anales Jardín Botánico 50 (2):239–245.
• HEDHLY A, HORMAZA JI, and HERRERO M. 2003. The effect of temperature on stigmatic receptivity in sweet cherry(Prunus avium L.). Plant, Cell and Environment 26:1673–1680.
• JAKOVLEV MA. 1985. Sravite¾naja Embryologija Cvetkovych Rastenij. Nauka, Leningrad.
• JOHRI BM, AMBEGAOKAR KB, and SRIVASTAVA PS. 1992. Comparative Embryology of Angiosperms. SpringerVerlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
• JIA HJ. 2008. Influences of cross pollination on pollen tube growth and fruit set in Zuili Plums (Prunus salicina).Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 50: 203–209.
• KESEROVIĆ Z. 1996. Embriogeneza u trešnje i višnje. Jugoslovensko voćarstvo 30: 143–150.
• MARHOLD K, and WOJCICKI JJ. 1992. Cerasus Miller – èerešòa. In: Bertová L [ed.], Flóra Slovenska IV/3, 509–533.Veda, Bratislava.
• MIAJA ML, RADICATI L, PORPORATO M, CARAMIELLO R, FOSSA V, and VALLANIA R. 2000. Morpho-physiological observationson pollen of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) cultivars.Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 514: 311–320.
• MIRANDA C, SANTESTEBAN LG, and ROYO JB. 2005. Variability in the relationship between frost temperature and injurylevel for some cultivated Prunus species. HortScience40: 357–361.
• OSTROLUCKÁ MG, and KRIŽO M. 1989. Biológia Samèích Reprodukèných Orgánov Druhov Rodu Quercus L. Veda,Bratislava.
• PAZOURKOVÁ Z. 1986. Botanická Mikrotechnika. KU, Praha. PEREZ S, and MOORE JN. 1985. Prezygotic endogenous barriersto interspecific hybridization in Prunus. Journal ofAmerican Society for Horticultural Science 110:267–273.
• PODDUBNAJA-ARNOLDI VA. 1982. Charakteristika Semjejstv Pokrytosemennych Rastenij po CitoembryologièeskimPriznakam. Nauka, Moskva.
• RADICE S, ONTIVERO M, GIORDANI E, and BELLINI E. 2008. Anatomical differences on development of fertile andsterile pollen grains of Prunus salicina Lindl. PlantSystematics and Evolution 273: 63–69.
• ØEHOØEK V, and SVOBODOVÁ Z. 1985. Floristické pomery nitrianskeho okresu. Rosalia 2: 91–112.
• SVOBODOVÁ Z. 1988. Niektoré zaujímavé lokality xerotermnej flóry v okrese Nové Zámky. In: Tajcnárová E, andMuránsky P [ed.], Zborník Odborných Prác V.Západoslovenského TOP-u. Zv. IV. Kamenín, 30–42.KÚŠOP, Bratislava.
• SVOBODOVÁ Z, ØEHOØEK V, and ULRYCH L. 2000. Flóra vrchu Dank v Belianskych kopcoch. Rosalia 15: 19–24.
• SVOBODOVÁ Z, ØEHOØEK V, and ULRYCH L. 2007. Cievnaté rastliny Zoborských vrchov. In: Øehoøek V. [ed.],Lišajníky, Machorasty a Cievnaté Rastliny Zoborských Vrchov, 62–160. Slovenská po¾nohospodárska univerzita, Nitra.
• SVOBODOVÁ Z, and ULRYCH L. 2000. Súèasný stav rastlinného krytu prírodnej rezervácie Vàšok. Rosalia 15: 7–14.
• THOMPSON MM, and LIU LJ. 1973. Temperature, fruit set, and embryo sac development in 'Italian' prune. Journal of theAmerican Society for Horticultural Science 98:193–197.
• WOJCICKI JJ. 1991. Prunus × stacei (Rosaceae), a new spontaneous threefold hybrid of P. fruticosa, P. cerasus andP. avium. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica. 35:139–142.

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu