Dietary addition of crude form or ethanol extract of brown propolis as nutritional additive on behaviour, productive performance and carcass traits of lambs in feedlot

• Autorzy: da Silva J.A. , Itavo C.C.B.F. , Itavo L.C.V. , da Graca Morais M. , da Silva P.C.G. , Ferelli K.L.S.M. , de Souza Arco T.F.F.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study was aimed to examine the nutritional efficiency of the balanced supply of flavonoids from the crude or ethanol extract of brown propolis on behaviour, productive performance and carcass traits of lambs in feedlot. Twenty four male lambs were divided into 4 groups (6 animals in each) and fed diet supplemented with: crude brown propolis [13 g/kg dry matter (DM)], propolis ethanol extract (15 ml/kg DM), sodic monensin (0.032 g/kg DM) – positive control, or diet without any enrichment (negative control). The basic diet was a total mixed ration with roughage:concentrate ratio of 500:500 (w/w). In animals receiving crude propolis (P < 0.05) DM intake was higher than in animals fed sodic monensin in the diet. The use of feed additives did not affect feeding behaviour and lambs performance. Carcass yield was lower (P < 0.05) in lambs receiving diet with sodic monensin than in lambs fed diets with crude propolis. Also the propolis extract addition into diet decreased carcass yield in comparison to control group. Propolis addition altered the fatty acid profile of meat reducing saturated fatty acid content and increasing unsaturated one in comparison to control group. So, brown propolis supplementation can influence lamb carcass traits and meat quality; however the form of propolis is an important factor. The possible addition of propolis into animal feed can be important from human nutrition point of view.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 28
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.31-40,ref.

Twórcy

autor

da Silva J.A.

• Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FAMEZ), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Av.Senador Filinto Muller 2443, Cidade Universitaria, 79070-900 Campo Grande, Braziil

autor

Itavo C.C.B.F.

• Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FAMEZ), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Av.Senador Filinto Muller 2443, Cidade Universitaria, 79070-900 Campo Grande, Braziil

autor

Itavo L.C.V.

• Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FAMEZ), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Av.Senador Filinto Muller 2443, Cidade Universitaria, 79070-900 Campo Grande, Braziil

autor

da Graca Morais M.

• Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FAMEZ), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Av.Senador Filinto Muller 2443, Cidade Universitaria, 79070-900 Campo Grande, Braziil

autor

da Silva P.C.G.

• Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FAMEZ), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Av.Senador Filinto Muller 2443, Cidade Universitaria, 79070-900 Campo Grande, Braziil

autor

Ferelli K.L.S.M.

• Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FAMEZ), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Av.Senador Filinto Muller 2443, Cidade Universitaria, 79070-900 Campo Grande, Braziil

autor

de Souza Arco T.F.F.

• Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FAMEZ), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Av.Senador Filinto Muller 2443, Cidade Universitaria, 79070-900 Campo Grande, Braziil

Bibliografia

• Aquiar S.C., Cottica S.M., Boeing J.S., Samensari R.B., Santos G.T., Visentainer J.V., Zeoula L.M., 2014. Effect of feeding phenolic compounds from propolis extracts to dairy cows on milk production, milk fatty acid composition, and the antioxidant capacity of milk. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 193, 148–154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.04.006
• Aguiar S.C., Zeoula L.M., Franco S.L., Peres L.P., Arcuri P.B., Forano E., 2013. Antimicrobial activity of Brazilian propolis extracts against rumen bacteria in vitro. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 1951–1959, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1361-x
• AOAC International, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17thEdition. Gaithersburg, MD (USA)
• Choi Y.M., Noh D.O., Cho S.Y., Suh H.J., Kim K.M., Kim J.M., 2006. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of propolis from several regions of Korea. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 39, 756–761, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.05.015
• de Paula E.M., Samensari R.B., Machado E., Pereira L.M., Maia F.J., Yoshimura E.H., Franzolin R., Faciola A.P., Zeoula L.M., 2016. Effects of phenolic compounds on ruminal protozoa population, ruminal fermentation, and digestion in water buffaloes. Livest. Sci. 185, 136–141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.01.021
• Funari C.S., Ferro V.O., 2006. Propolis analysis. Ciencia Tecnol. Aliment. 26, 171–178, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612006000100028
• Gomes M.F.F., Ítavo C.C.B.F., Ítavo L.C.V., Leal C.R.B., Silva J.A., Heimbach N.S., Leal E.S., 2017. In vitro fermentation characteristics of ruminant diets using ethanol extract of brown propolis as a nutritional additive. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 46, 599–605, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-92902017000700007
• Gomes M.F.F., Ítavo C.C.B.F., Leal C.R.B., Ítavo L.C.V., Lunas R.C., 2016. In vitro biological activity of brown propolis. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 36, 279–282, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2016000400005
• Gonzalez-Momita M.L., Kawas J.R., García-Castillo R., GonzalezMorteo C., Aguirre-Ortega J., Hernandez-Vidal G., FimbresDurazo H., Picón-Rubio F.J., Lu C.D., 2009. Nutrient intake, digestibility, mastication and ruminal fermentation of Pelibuey lambs fed finishing diets with ionophore (monensin or lasalocid) and sodium malate. Small Ruminant Res. 83, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.11.008
• Heimbach N.S., Ítavo C.C.B.F., Ítavo L.C.V., Franco G.L., Leal C.R.B., Leal E.S., Silva P.C.G., Rezende L.C., Silva J.A., 2014. Residue from extraction of brown propolis in the diet to ruminants: in vitro digestibility and gas production. Arch. Zootecn. 63, 259–267, https://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922014000200004
• Heimbach N.S., Ítavo C.C.B.F., Leal C.R.B., Ítavo L.C.V., Silva J.A., Silva P.C.G., Rezende L.C., Gomes M.F.F., 2016. Propolis extraction residue like bacterial inhibitor in vitro. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim. 17, 65–72, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402016000100007
• Heydari K.H., Dabiri N., Fayazi J., Roshanfekr H., 2008. Effect of ionophores monensin and lasalocid on performance and carcass characteristics in fattening Arabi lambs. Pak. J. Nutr. 7, 81–84, https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2008.81.84
• Ítavo C.C.B.F., Morais M.G., Costa C., Ítavo L.C.V., Franco G.L., da Silva J.A., Reis F.A., 2011a. Addition of propolis or monensin in the diet: behaviour and productivity of lambs in feedlot. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 165, 161–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.02.020
• Ítavo C.C.B.F., Morais M.G., Costa C., Ítavo L.C.V., Macedo F.A.F., Tomich T.R., 2009. Carcass characteristics, non-components and yield of retail products from lambs in feedlot system receiving diets with propolis or sodic monensin as additive. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 38, 898–905, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000500017
• Ítavo C.C.B.F., Morais M.G., Ramos C.L., Ítavo L.C.V., Tomich T.R., Silva J.A., 2011b. Green propolis extract as additive in the diet for lambs in feedlot. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 40, 1991–1996, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-3598201100090002140 Brown propolis
• LandimA.V., Mariante A.S., McManus A., Gurgel R., Paiva S.R., 2007. Quantitative carcass characteristics, morphometric measurements and their correlations in different sheep genotypes (in Portuguese: Características quantitativas da carcaça, medidas morfométricas e suas correlações em diferentes genótipos de ovinos). Ciencia Anim. Bras. 8, 665–676
• Matthews C., Crispie F., Lewis E., Reid M., O’Toole P.W., Cotter P.D., 2018. The rumen microbiome: a crucial consideration when optimising milk and meat production and nitrogen utilisation efficiency. Gut Microbes, https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1505176
• Mertens D.R., 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beaker or crucibles: collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 85, 1217–1240
• Mirzoeva O.K., Grishanin R.N., Calder P.C., 1997. Antimicrobial action of propolis and some of its components: the effects on growth, membrane potential and motility of bacteria. Microbiol. Res. 152, 239–246, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0944-5013(97)80034-1
• Moreno G.M.B., Silva Sobrinho A.G., Leão A.G., Oliveira R.V., Yokoo M.J.I., Sousa Júnior S.C., Perez H.L., 2010. Morphological characteristics in vivo and carcass of lambs finished in feedlot and their correlations. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim. 11, 888–902
• Morsy A.S., Soltan Y.A., Sallam S.M.A., Kreuzer M., Alencar S.M., Abdalla A.L., 2015. Comparison of the in vitro efficiency of supplementary bee propolis extracts of different origin in enhancing the ruminal degradability of organic matter and mitigating the formation of methane. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 199, 51–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.004
• NRC (National Research Council), 2007. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. The National Academies Press. Washington, DC (USA), https://doi.org/10.17226/11654
• Oliveira M.V.M., Lana R.P., Eifert E.C., Luz D.F., Pereira J.C., Pérez J.R.O., Vargas Júnior F.M., 2007. Effect of monensin on intake and apparent digestibility of nutrients in sheep fed diets with different crude protein levels. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 36, 643–651, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982007000300018
• Osório J.C., de Oliveira N.M., Jardim P.O., Monteiro E.M., 1996a. Meat production in sheep of five genotypes: 2. Live weight components. Ciencia Rural 26, 471–475, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84781996000300023
• Osório J.C., de Oliveira N.M., Nunes A.P., Pouey J.L., 1996b. Meat production in sheep of five genotypes: 3. Losses and morphology. Ciencia Rural 26, 477–481, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84781996000300024
• Robertson J.B., Van Soest P.J., 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In: W.P.T. James, O. Theander (Editors). The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York, NY (USA), pp. 123–158
• Silva J.A., Ítavo C.C.B.F., Ítavo L.C.V., Morais M.G., Franco G.L., Zeoula L.M., Heimbach N.S., 2014. Effects of dietary brown propolis on nutrient intake and digestibility in feedlot lambs. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 43, 376–381, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000700006
• Soltan Y.A., Hashem N.M., Morsy A.S., El-Azrak K.M., Nour ElDin A., Sallam S.M., 2018. Comparative effects of Moringa oleifera root bark and monensin supplementations on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility and growth performance of growing lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 235, 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.11.021
• Stelzer F.S., Lana R.P., Campos J.M.S., Mancio A.B., Pereira J.C., Lima J.G., 2009. Performance of milking cows fed concentrate at different levels associated or not with propolis. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 38, 1381–1389, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000700030
• Stradiotti Jr D., Queiroz A.C., Lana R.P., Pacheco C.G., Eifert E.C., Nunes P.M.M., 2004. Effect of the propolis on amino acids deamination and ruminal fermentation. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 33, 1086–1092, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000400029
• Torres C., Moreno M.Á., Zarazaga M., 2010. Prudent use of antimicrobial agents: Not just for humans. Enferm. Infec. Microbiol. Clin. 28, 669–671, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2010.09.001

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.22358/jafs/105442/2019