A strange tale of taillessness in a vespertilionid bat

• Autorzy: Coleman J.L.
• Języki publikacji: EN
• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Chiropterologica
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 11
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.212-215,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Coleman J.L.

• Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada

Bibliografia

• Adams, D. C., F. J. Rohlf, and D. E. Slice. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71: 5-16.
• Ahlén, I. 1981. Identification of Scandinavian bats by their sounds. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Rapport, 6: 1-56.
• Barlow, K. E. 1997. The diets of two phonic types of the bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus in Britain. Journal of Zoology (London), 243: 597-609.
• Barlow, K. E., and G. Jones. 1997. Differences in song-flight calls and social calls between two phonic types of the vespertilionid bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Journal of Zoology (London), 241: 315-324.
• Barlow, K. E., and G. Jones. 1999. Roosts, echolocation calls and wing morphology of two phonic types of the Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 64: 257-268.
• Barlow, K. E., G. Jones, and E. M. Barratt. 1997. Can skull morphology be used to predict ecological relationships between bat species? A test using two cryptic species of pipistrelle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 264B: 1695-1700.
• Barratt, E. M., R. Deaville, T. M. Burland, M. W. Bruford, G. Jones, P. A. Racey, and R. K. Wayne. 1997. DNA answers the call of pipistrelle bat species. Nature, 97: 138-139.
• Bartonička, T., Z. Řehák, and J. Gaisler. 2007. Can pipistrelles, Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774) and Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Leach, 1825), foraging in a group, change parameters of their signals? Journal of Zoology (London), 272: 194-201.
• Bogdanowicz, W. 1992. Sexual dimorphism in size of the skull in European Myotis daubentoni (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Pp. 17-25, in Prague studies in mammalogy (I. Horáček and V. Vohralík, eds.). Charles University Press, Praha, xxi + 246 pp.
• Bogdanowicz, W., M. B. Fenton, and K. Daleszczyk. 1999. The relationships between echolocation calls, morphology and diet in insectivorous bats. Journal of Zoology (London), 247: 381-393.
• Bogdanowicz, W., J. Juste, R. D. Owen, and A. K. Sztencel. 2005. Geometric morphometries and cladistics: testing evolutionary relationships in mega- and microbats. Acta Chiropterologica, 7: 39-49.
• Bornholdt, R., L. R. Oliveira, and M. E. Fabian. 2008. Size and shape variability in the skull of Myotis nigricans (Schinz, 1821) (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from two geographic areas in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 68: 623-631.
• Bryja, J., P. Kaňuch, A. Fornůsková, T. Bartonička, and Z. Řehák. 2009. Low population genetic structuring of two cryptic bat species suggests their migratory behaviour in continental Europe. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 96: 103-114.
• Burnett, C. D. 1983. Geographic and secondary sexual variation in the morphology of Eptesicus fuscus. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 52: 139-162.
• Campbell, N. A., and D. J. Kitchener. 1980. Morphological divergence in the genus Eptesicus (Microchiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in Western Australia: a multivariate approach. Australian Journal of Zoology, 28: 457-474.
• Cardini, A., and S. Elton. 2007. Sample size and sampling error in geometric morphometric studies of size and shape. Zoomorphology, 126: 121-134.
• Clifton, K. B., and P. J. Motta. 1998. Feeding morphology, diet, and ecomorphological relationships among five Caribbean labrids (Teleostei, Labridae). Copeia, 4: 953-966.
• Davidson-Watts, I., and G. Jones. 2006. Differences in foraging behaviour between Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774) and Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Leach, 1825). Journal of Zoology (London), 268: 55-62.
• De Gueldre, G., and F. De Vree. 1984. Movements of the mandibles and tongue during mastication and swallowing in Pteropus giganteus (Megachiroptera). A cineradiographical study. Journal of Morphology, 179: 95-114.
• De Gueldre, G., and F. De Vree. 1988. Quantitative electromyography of the masticatory muscles of Pteropus giganteus (Megachiroptera). Journal of Morphology, 196: 73-106.
• De Gueldre, G., and F. De Vree. 1990. Biomechanics of the masticatory apparatus of Pteropus giganteus (Megachiroptera). Journal of Zoology (London), 220: 311-332.
• Dumont, E. R. 2004. Patterns of diversity in cranial shape among plant-visiting bats. Acta Chiropterologica, 6: 59-74.
• Emerson, S. B., and L. Radinsky. 1980. Functional analysis of sabertooth cranial morphology. Paleobiology, 6: 295-312.
• Evin, A., M. Baylac, M. Ruedi, M. Mucedda, and J. M. Pons. 2008. Taxonomy, skull diversity and evolution in a species complex of Myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): a geometric morphometric appraisal. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 95: 529-538.
• Fenton, M. B. 1988. Head size and the foraging behaviour of animal-eating bats. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67: 2029-2035.
• Fenton, M. B., and W. Bogdanowicz. 2002. Relationships between external morphology and foraging behaviour: bats in the genus Myotis. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80: 1004-1013.
• Findley, J. S., and G. L. Traut. 1970. Geographic variation in Pipistrellus hesperus. Journal of Mammalogy, 51: 741-765.
• Findley, J. S., and D. E. Wilson. 1982. Ecological significance of chiropteran morphology. Pp. 243-260, in Ecology of bats (T. H. Kunz, ed.). Plenum Press, New York, 425 pp.
• Freeman, P. W. 1979. Specialized insectivory: beetle-eating and moth-eating molossid bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 60: 467-479.
• Freeman, P. W. 1981a. A multivariate study of the family Molossidae (Mammalia, Chiroptera): morphology, ecology, evolution. Fieldiana: Zoology (N.S.), 7: 1-173.
• Freeman, P. W. 1981b. Correspondence of food habits and morphology in insectivorous bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 62: 166-173.
• Freeman, P. W. 1984. Functional cranial analysis of large animalivorous bats (Microchiroptera). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 21: 387-408.
• Freeman, P. W. 1988. Frugivorous and animalivorous bats (Microchiroptera): dental and cranial adaptations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 33: 249-272.
• Freeman, P. W. 1992. Canine teeth of bats (Microchiroptera): size, shape, and role in crack propagation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 45: 97-115.
• Freeman, P. W. 1995. Nectarivorous feeding mechanisms in bats. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 56:439-463.
• Freeman, P. W. 2000. Macroevolution in Microchiroptera: recoupling morphology and ecology with phylogeny. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2: 317-335.
• Freeman, P. W., and W. N. Weins. 1997. Puncturing ability of bat canine teeth: the tip. Pp. 225-232, in Life among the muses: papers in honor of James S. Findley (T. L. Yates, W. L. Gannon, and D. E. Wilson, eds.). Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 302 pp.
• Fujita, M. 1984. Geographic variation and sexual dimorphism in Myotis lucifugus: do bigger babies make bigger mothers? Bat Research News, 25: 41.
• Gannon, W. L., and G. R. Racz. 2006. Character displacement and ecomorphological analysis of two long-eared Myotis (M. auriculus and M. evotis). Journal of Mammalogy, 87: 171-179.
• Goldman, L. J., and O. W. Henson, Jr. 1977. Prey recognition and selection by the constant-frequency bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2: 411-419.
• Häussler, U., A. Nagel, M. Braun, and A. Arnold. 2000. External characters discriminating sibling species of European pipistrelles, Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774) and P. pygmaeus (Leach, 1825). Myotis, 37: 27-40.
• ICZN. 2003. Opinion 2028 (Case 3073). Vespertillio pipistrellus Schreber, 1774 and V. pygmaeus Leach, 1825 (currently Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P pygmaeus; Mammalia, Chiroptera): neotypes designated. The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 60: 85-87.
• Iliopoulou-Georgudaki, J. G. 1984. Intraspecific and intrapopulation morphologic variation in the sharp-eared bat, Myotis blythii (Tomes, 1857) (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), from Greece. Bonner zoologische Beiträge, 15: 15-24.
• Jacobs, D. S. 1996. Morphological divergence in an insular bat, Lasiurus cinereus semotus. Functional Ecology, 10: 622-630.
• Jones, G., and E. M. Barratt. 1999. Vespertilio pipistrellus Schreber, 1774 and V. pygmaeus Leach, 1825 (currently Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus; Mammalia, Chiroptera): proposed designation of neotypes. The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 56: 182-186.
• Jones, G., and S. M. van Parijs. 1993. Bimodal echolocation in pipistrelle bats: are cryptic species present? Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, 251B: 119-125.
• Kallen, F. C., and C. Gans. 1972. Mastication in the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus. Journal of Morphology, 136: 385-420.
• Klingenberg, C. P. 2008. MorphoJ. Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, UK. http://www.flywings.org.uk/ MorphoJ_page.htm
• Marcus, L. F., M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice. 1996. Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York, 620 pp.
• Mayer, F., and O. von Helversen. 2001. Sympatric distribution of cryptic bat species across Europe. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 74: 365-374.
• Myers, P. 1978. Sexual dimorphism in size of vespertilionid bats. American Naturalist, 112: 701-711.
• Neuweiler, G. 2000. The biology of bats. Oxford University Press, New York, 320 pp.
• Nicholls, B., and P. A. Racey. 2006. Habitat selection as a mechanism of resource partitioning in two cryptic bat species Pipistrellus pipistrellus and Pipistrellus pygmaeus. Ecography, 29: 697-708.
• Nogueira, M. R., L. R. Monteiro, A. L. Peracchi, and A. F. B. de Araújo. 2005. Ecomorphological analysis of the masticatory apparatus in the seed-eating bats, genus Chiroderma (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Journal of Zoology (London), 266: 355-364.
• O’ Higgins, P. 2000. The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry. Journal of Anatomy, 197: 103-120.
• O’Higgins, P., and N. Jones. 2006. Tools for statistical shape analysis. Hull York Medical School, Hull, http://hyms.fme. googlepages.com/resources.
• Papadatou, E., R. K. Butlin, and J. D. Altringham. 2008. Identification of bat species in Greece from their echolocation calls. Acta Chiropterologica, 10: 127-143.
• Park, K. J., J. D. Altringham, and G. Jones. 1996. Assortative roosting in the two phonic types of Pipistrellus pipistrellus during the mating season. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 263B: 1495-1499.
• Perez-Barberia, F. J., and I. J. Gordon. 1999. The functional relationship between feeding type and jaw and cranial morphology in ungulates. Oecologia, 118: 157-165.
• Racey, P. A., E. M. Barratt, T. M. Burland, R. Deaville, D. Gotelli, G. Jones, and S. B. Piertney. 2007. Microsatellite DNA polymorphism confirms reproductive isolation and reveals differences in population genetic structure of cryptic pipistrelle bat species. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90: 539-550.
• Ralls, K. 1976. Mammals in which females are larger than males. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 51: 245-276.
• Rohlf, F. J. 2000. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.11T. Exeter Software, Setauket.
• StatSoft, Inc. 2005. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.1. www.statsoft.com.
• Stebbings, R. E. 1973. Size clines in the bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus related to climatic factors. Periodicum Biologorum, 75: 189-194.
• Storz, J. F., J. Balasingh, H. R. Bhat, P. N. Thiruchenthil, D. P. Swami Doss, A. A. Prakash, and T. H. Kunz. 2001. Clinal variation in body size and sexual dimorphism in an Indian fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 72: 17-31.
• Swartz, S. M., P. W. Freeman, and E. F. Stockwell. 2003. Ecomorphology of bats: comparative and experimental approaches relating structural design toecology. Pp. 257-300, in Bat ecology (T. H. Kunz and M. B. Fenton, eds.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 779 pp.
• Swiderski, D. L., M. Zelditch, and W. L. Fink. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-splines. Hystrix (N.S.), 11: 49-75.
• Tschapka, M., E. B. Sperr, L. A. Caballero-Martínez, and R. A. Medellín. 2008. Diet and cranial morphology of Musonycteris harrisoni, a highly specialized nectar-feeding bat in western Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy, 89: 924-932.
• Turnbull, W. D. 1970. Mammalian masticatory apparatus. Fieldiana: Geology, 18: 149-356.
• Van Cakenberghe, V., A. Herrel, and L. F. Aguirre. 2002 Evolutionary relationships between cranial shape and diet in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Pp. 205-236, in Topics in functional and ecological vertebrate morphology (P. Aerts, A. Herrel, K. D’Aout, and R. Van Damme, eds.). Shaker, Maastricht, 372 pp.
• Vaughan, N., G. Jones, and S. Harris. 1997. Habitat use by bats (Chiroptera) assessed by means of a broad-brand acoustic method. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34: 716-730.
• Weid, R., and O. von Helversen. 1987. Ortungsrufe europäischer Fledermäuse beim Jagdflug im Freiland. Myotis, 25: 5-27.
• Williams, D. F., and J. S. Findley. 1979. Sexual size dimorphism in vespertilionid bats. The American Midland Naturalist, 102: 113-126.
• Zelditch, M. L., D. L. Swiderski, H. D. Sheets, and W. L. Fink. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier, New York, 443 pp.
• Zingg, P. 1990. Akustische Artidentifikation von Fledermäusen (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in der Schweiz. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 97: 263-294.