Habitat selection and activity patterns in the greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis

• Autorzy: Rudolph B.-U. , Liegl A. , Von Helversen O.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The habitat preferences and activity of greater mouse-eared bats were investigated by means of radio-telemetry in two regions in Upper Franconia (Bavaria, Germany) that are characterized by a mosaic of deciduous forests, coniferous forests and woodless areas. In one case bats roosted in a maternity colony from which they visited foraging habitats up to 10.8 km away; in the second, the bats started in a cave which served as a night roost. These bats foraged around the cave up to 2.5 km away. Mean size of foraging areas was 13.1 ± 4.6 ha. Most of the bats used several foraging areas per night (mean 5.1, range 1-10). Hunting time per foraging site ranged from 5 to 224 (median 25) minutes. Foraging habitats in some individuals remained constant over two consecutive years. The bats hunted almost exclusively in woodland (98% of the hunting time) with a significant preference for deciduous forests as opposed to coniferous forests. The preference for deciduous forests as foraging habitats is likely to be caused by: (1) a higher density of suitable prey animals and (2) a better accessibility of the ground-dwelling prey due to the lack of ground vegetation. The mean time span between emergence from the roost and return lasted about 5.5 hours. On average, 79.9 ± 9.0% of that time the bats spent flying. They behaved like other gleaning bats and did not show distinct activity peaks. The proportion of commuting flights (between roost and foraging area and between different foraging sites) added up to about 19% of the flight activity whereas the rest of the time in flight was spent hunting. Interruptions in the hunting activity occurred regularly, about five times per night and bat. These breaks lasted 1 to 130 (median 10) minutes and were spent in temporarily used night roosts and on perches. The bats hunted mainly during slow flight, but we also found evidence for hunting from perches on tree trunks as an additional foraging strategy.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Chiropterologica
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 11
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.351-361,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Rudolph B.-U.

• Bavarian Environment Agency, Burgermeister-Ulrich Strase 160, D-86179 Augsburg, Germany

autor

Liegl A.

• Lochbachstrase 1, D-86179 Augsburg, Germany

autor

Von Helversen O.

• Zoological Institute, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Staudtstrase 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany

Bibliografia

• Arlettaz, R. 1995. Ecology of the sibling mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii). Zoogeography, niche, competition, and foraging. Horus Publishers, Martigny, Switzerland, 208 pp.
• Arlettaz, R. 1996. Feeding behaviour and foraging strategy of free-living mouse-eared bats, Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. Animal Behavior, 51: 1—11.
• Arlettaz, R. 1999. Habitat selection as a major resource partitioning mechanism between the two sympatric sibling bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. Journal of Animal Ecolgy, 68: 460-471.
• Arlettaz, R., and N. Perrin. 1995. The trophic niches of sympatric sibling Myotis myotis and M. blythii: do mouse-eared bats select prey? Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 67: 361-376.
• Arlettaz, R., G. Jones, and P. A. Racey. 2001. Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats. Nature, 414: 742-745.
• Audet, D. 1990. Foraging behaviour and habitat use by a gleaning bat, Myotis myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 71: 420-427.
• Bauerova, Z. 1978. Contribution to the trophic ecology of Myotis myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertiolionidae). Folia Zoologica, 27: 305-316.
• Chruszcz, B. J., and R. M. R. Barclay. 2003. Prolonged foraging bouts of a solitary gleaning/hawking bat, Myotis evotis. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81: 823-826.
• Davidson-Watts, I., and G. Jones. 2006. Differences in foraging behaviour between Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774) and Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Leach, 1825). Journal of Zoology (London), 268: 55-62.
• Dense, C., and U. Rahmel 2002. Telemetrische Untersuchungen an Mausohren (Myotis myotis) im südlichen Niedersachsen zur Bestimmung des Aktionsraumes bei der Jagd vor dem Hintergrund der Abgrenzung von FFH-Gebieten. Informationsdienst Naturschutz Niedersachsen, 22: 41-47.
• Drescher, C. 2004. Radiotracking of Myotis myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in South Tyrol and implications for its conservation. Mammalia, 68: 387-395.
• Entwistle, A. C., P. A. Racey, and J. R. Speakman. 1996. Habitat exploitation by a gleaning bat, Plecotus auritus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 351B: 921-931.
• Finch, O. D. 2005. Evaluation of mature conifer plantations as secondary habitat for epigeic forest arthropods (Coleoptera: Carabidae; Araneae). Forest Ecology and Management, 204: 21-34.
• Gebhard, J., and K. Hirschi 1985. Analyse des Kotes aus einer Wochenstube von Myotis myotis (Borkh., 1797) bei Zwingen (Kanton Bern, Schweiz). Mitteilungen der naturforschenden Gesellschaft Bern, 42: 145-155.
• Greenslade, P. J. M. 1963. Daily rhythms of locomotor activity in some Carabidae (Coleoptera). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 6: 171-180.
• Güttinger, R. 1997. Jagdhabitate des Großen Mausohrs (Myotis myotis) in der modernen Kulturlandschaft. Schriftenreihe. Umwelt 288 (Schweizer Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, ed.). Schweizer Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, Bern, 138 pp.
• Güttinger, R., A. Zahn, F. Krapp, and W. Schober. 2003. Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797) — Großes Mausohr, Großmausohr. Pp. 123-207, in Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas, Band 4: Fledertiere, Teil I: Chiroptera 1 (Rhinolophidae, Vespertilionidae 1) (J. Niethammer and F. Krapp, eds.). Aula-Verlag, Wiebelsheim, x + 602 pp.
• Hertweck, K., and B. Plesky. 2006. Raumnutzung und Nahrungshabitate des Großen Mausohrs (Myotis myotis) in der östlichen Oberlausitz (Sachsen, Deutschland). Säuge- tierkundliche Informationen, 5: 651-662.
• Horáček, I. 1985. Population ecology of Myotis myotis in central Bohemia (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Biologica, 8: 161-267.
• Jones, G., and J. M. V. Rayner. 1989. Foraging behaviour and echolocation of wild horseshoe bats Rhinolophus ferrumequinum and R. hipposideros (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25: 183-191.
• Kolb, A. 1958. Über die Nahrungsaufnahme einheimischer Fledermäuse vom Boden. Zoologischer Anzeiger, Supplement, 22: 162-168.
• Liegl, A., and O. von Helversen. 1987. Jagdgebiet eines Mausohrs (Myotis myotis) weitab von der Wochenstube. Myotis, 25: 71-76.
• Roer, H. 1985. The population density of the mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis Borkh.) in northwest Europe. Myotis, 28: 19-38.
• Rudolph, B.-U., and A. Liegl. 1990. Sommerverbreitung und Siedlungsdichte des Mausohrs Myotis myotis in Nordbayern. Myotis, 28: 19-38.
• Rudolph, B.-U., A. Liegl, and A. Zahn. 2004. Großes Mausohr (Myotis myotis). Pp. 203-231, in Fledermäuse in Bayern (A. Meschede and B.-U. Rudolph, eds.). E. Ulmer-Verlag, Stuttgart, 411 pp.
• Rydell, J., A. C. Entwistle, and P. A. Racey. 1996. Timing of foraging flights of three species of bats in relation to insect activity and predation risk. Oikos, 76: 243-252.
• Schaefer, M., and J. Schauermann. 1990. The soil fauna of beech forests: comparison between a mull and a moder soil. Pedobiology, 34: 299-314.
• Schauermann, J. 1986. Siedlungsdichte und Biomasse. Pp. 225-266, in Ökosystemforschung — Ergebnisse des Sollingprojektes 1966-1986 (H. Ellenberg, R. Mayer, and J. Schauermann, eds.). E. Ulmer-Verlag, Stuttgart, 507 pp.
• Shiel, C. B., R. E. Shiel, and J. S. Fairley 1999. Seasonal changes in the foraging behaviour of Leisler’s bats (Nyctalus leisleri) in Ireland as revealed by radio-telemetry. Journal of Zoology (London), 249: 347-358.
• Siemers, B. M., and R. Güttinger. 2006. Prey conspicuousness can explain apparent prey selectivity. Current Biology, 16: 157-159.
• Simon, M., S. Hüttenbügel, and J. Smit-Viergutz. 2004. Ökologie und Schutz von Fledermäusen in Dörfern und Städten. Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz, 76: 1-275.
• Vogel, J., and P. Krost. 1990. Zur Carabidenfauna pedologisch und floristisch unterschiedener Waldbiotope in Schleswig-Holstein. Faunistisch-Ökologische Mitteilungen, 6: 87-94.
• Zahn, A. 1995. Populationsbiologische Untersuchungen am Großen Mausohr Myotis myotis. Ph.D. Thesis, University of München, München, 130 pp.
• Zahn, A., H. Haselbach, and R. Güttinger. 2005. Foraging activity of central European Myotis myotis in a landscape dominated by spruce monocultures. Mammalian Biolgy, 70: 265-270.
• Zahn, A., A. Rottenwallner, and R. Güttinger. 2006. Population density of the greater mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis), local diet and availability of foraging habitats. Journal of Zoology (London), 269: 486-493.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/150811009X485585