The evolution of physical activity guidelines

• Autorzy: Piatkowska M. , Ruzbarska I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

As the scientific support for the impact of physical activity on health has grown, physical activity recommendations for the public have been modified. The aim of the paper is to present the evolution of physical activity guidelines, which were formulated on the basis of existing research evidence, produced by experts, mainly in physiology and medicine.A systematic literature review was applied. In order to interpret the content of text data, a qualitative content analysis was used. It was supported by the Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA) computer software package NVivo 9.Recognition of hazards of a sedentary lifestyle has led numerous groups to promulgate public health recommendations for physical activity. Since 1950s leading scientists and science organisations have participated in developing and publicising these guidelines and in revising them to keep up with the pace of modern exercise science. The paper discusses reasons for differences in the guidelines and provides a summary in order to harmonize existing reports.Using epidemiological, clinical and laboratory methods, different expert committees have independently arrived at similar conclusions about the need for physical activity in daily life. However, formulating guidelines regarding an optimal dose of physical activity, which could be universal for everybody, is very problematic. A recommended dose of physical activity must be approachable and adjusted to a particular person or a group.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity. The Journal of Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 03
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.299-310,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Piatkowska M.

• Department of Organisation of Physical Culture, Josef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, 34 Marymoncka Str, 00-968 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Ruzbarska I.

• Chair of Social Sciences, International College of Management ISM Slovakia, Presov, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• 1. Grabowski H. Teoria fizycznej edukacji [in Polish] [Theory of physical education]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne; 1999.
• 2. Winiarski R. Wstęp do teorii rekreacji [in Polish] [Introduction to theory of recreation]. Kraków: AWF; 1989.
• 3. Wolańska T, editor. Leksykon - sport dla wszystkich - rekreacja ruchowa [in Polish] [Lexicon - sport for all - movement recreation]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo AWF; 1997.
• 4. Haskell WL. Dose-Response Issues in Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health. In: Bouchard C, Blair SN, Haskell WL, editors. Physical Activity and Health. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2007,1030-1039.
• 5. Blair SN, LaMonte MJ, Nichaman MZ. The evolution of physical activity recommendations: how much is enough? Am J Clin Nutr 2004 May;79(5):913S-20S.
• 6. Kucera M. Ilościowa ocena potrzeb ruchowych dzieci [in Polish] [Quantitive assessment of movement needs of children]. Wychowanie Fizyczne i Higiena Szkolna 1983;8:323.
• 7. Karvonen MJ, Kentala E, Mustala O. The effects of training on heart rate; a longitudinal study. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn 1957;35(3):307-15.
• 8. Cooper KH. Aerobics. New York: Bentam Books, Inc.; 1968.
• 9. Cooper KH. The point system. Appendix. In: Cooper KH, editor. The Aerobics Program for Total Well- Being; 1982.
• 10. Shephard RJ. Physical activity, health, and well-being at different life stages. Res Q Exerc Sport 1995 Dec;66(4):298-302.
• 11. PRON. Stanowisko Komisji Ochrony Zdrowia Rady Krajowej PRON w sprawie stanu kultury fizycznej dzieci i młodzieży [in Polish] [Statement of Health-Protection Committee of Domestic Council PRON on the state of physical culture in children and youth]. Kultura Fizyczna 1988(7-8):1-6.
• 12. Kasperczyk T. Ilościowe i jakościowe aspekty aktywności fizycznej człowieka dorosłego [Quantitive and qualitive aspcects of physical activity of an adult] [in Polish]. Fizjoterapia Polska 2001;1(1):74-5.
• 13. AHA. Statement on exercise: benefits and recommendations for physical activity programs for all Americans: a statement for health professionals by the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 1992;86:340-344.
• 14. AHA. Cardiac rehabilitation programs. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 1994 Sep;90(3):1602-10.
• 15. AHA. Exercise standards: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 1995;91:580-615.
• 16. Blair SN, Powell KE, Bazzarre TL, et al. Physical inactivity. Workshop V. AHA Prevention Conference III. Behavior change and compliance: keys to improving cardiovascular health. Circulation 1993 Sep;88(3):1402-5.
• 17. AACVPR. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation programs. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1991.
• 18. Vuori I. Exercise and physical health: musculoskeletal health and functional capabilities. Res Q Exerc Sport 1995 Dec;66(4):276-85.
• 19. AACVPR. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1993.
• 20. ACSM. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998 Jun;30(6):975-91.
• 21. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995 Feb 1;273(5):402-7.
• 22. Woolf-May K, Kearney EM, Owen A, Jones DW, Davison RC, Bird SR. The efficacy of accumulated short bouts versus single daily bouts of brisk walking in improving aerobic fitness and blood lipid profiles. Health Educ Res 1999 Dec;14(6):803-15.
• 23. Jakicic JM, Wing RR, Butler BA, Robertson RJ. Prescribing exercise in multiple short bouts versus one continuous bout: effects on adherence, cardiorespiratory fitness, and weight loss in overweight women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995 Dec;19(12):893-901.
• 24. Macfarlane DJ, Taylor LH, Cuddihy TF. Very short intermittent vs continuous bouts of activity in sedentary adults. Prev Med 2006 Oct;43(4):332-6.
• 25. Schmidt WD, Biwer CJ, Kalscheuer LK. Effects of long versus short bout exercise on fitness and weight loss in overweight females. J Am Coll Nutr 2001 Oct;20(5):494-501.
• 26. Hardman AE. Issues of fractionization of exercise (short vs long bouts). Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001 Jun; 33(6 Suppl):S421-7; discussion S52-3.
• 27. CDC. Surgeon General's report on physical activity and health. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 1996 Aug 21;276(7):522.
• 28. NIH. Physical activity and cardiovascular health. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health. JAMA 1996 Jul 17;276(3):241-6.
• 29. Waxman A. WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Food Nutr Bull 2004 Sep; 25(3):292-302.
• 30. Blair SN, Bouchard C, Gyarfas I, Holmann W, Iwane H, Knuttgen HG, et al. Exercise for health. WHO/FIMS Committee on Physical Activity for Health. Bulletin WHO. 1995.
• 31. WHO. Steps to health: a European framework to promote physical activity for health. Regional Office for Europe. 2007.
• 32. Hatano Y. Use of the pedometer for promoting daily walking exercise. Intern Council for Health, Phys Educ, and Recreation 1993(29):4-8.
• 33. Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR, Jr. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med 2004;34(1):1-8.
• 34. Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM. Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 2001 Mar;72(1):1-12.
• 35. Tudor-Locke C. Taking steps toward increased physical activity: using pedometers to measure and motivate. President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports Research Digest 2002;3(17).
• 36. Welk GJ, Differding JA, Thompson RW, Blair SN, Dziura J, Hart P. The utility of the Digi-walker step counter to assess daily physical activity patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S481-8.
• 37. WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity, Geneva, 3-5 June 1997.WHO Consultation on Obesity. Geneva, Switzerland; 1998.
• 38. Brooks GA, Butte NF, Rand WM, Flatt JP, Caballero B. Chronicle of the Institute of Medicine physical activity recommendation: how a physical activity recommendation came to be among dietary recommendations. Am J Clin Nutr 2004 May;79(5):921S-30S.
• 39. Trumbo P, Schlicker S, Yates AA, Poos M. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc 2002 Nov;102(11):1621-30.
• 40. Saris WH, Blair SN, van Baak MA, Eaton SB, Davies PS, Di Pietro L, et al. How much physical activity is enough to prevent unhealthy weight gain? Outcome of the IASO 1st Stock Conference and consensus statement. Obes Rev 2003 May;4(2):101-14.
• 41. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007 Aug;39(8):1423-34.
• 42. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007 Aug;39(8):1435-45.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10131-011-0030-4