PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 16 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Evaluation of morphological criteria of sperm quality before in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The quality of sperm has a direct influence on the fertilization and developmental competence of embryos. In the literature we did not find defined criteria for evaluation of normal sperm parameters in various species of domestic mammals. Therefore we attempted to review evaluation of criteria of morphologically normal human sperm and their abnormalities. All sperm cells observed in the stained sample are classified as normal or abnormal. Any abnormalities in morphology of sperm have a negative effect on the outcome in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Abnormal sperm are categorized into subgroups according to the observed defects (concerning the head and/or midpiece and/or tail). Most morphologically abnormal sperm have multiple defects. This article can be considered as guideline for the manual of sperm quality evaluation in different species of domestic mammals.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

16

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.773-785,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Histology and Embryology 2 Institute of Anatomy, Academy of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus 9, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
autor
  • Institute of Anatomy, Academy of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus 9, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
autor
  • Department of Histology and Embryology 2 Institute of Anatomy, Academy of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus 9, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
autor
  • Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
autor
  • Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Department of Histology and Embryology 2 Institute of Anatomy, Academy of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus 9, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Department Animal Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 13, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Alçada-Morais S, Sousa AP, Paiva A, Almeida-Santos T, Ramalho-Santos J (2013) Anterior positioning of sex chromosomes on the head of human sperm sorted using visible wavelengths. Syst Biol Reprod Med 59(4): 223-226.
  • Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, d’Angelo D (2008) Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online 16: 835-841.
  • Auger J (2010) Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics? Asian J Androl 12: 36-46.
  • Aziz N, Buchan I, Taylor C, Kingsland CR, Lewis-Jones I (1996) The sperm deformity index: a reliable predictor of the outcome of oocyte fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 66: 1000-1008.
  • Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovsky A, Yagoda A, Lederman H, Artzi S, Gross M, Barak Y (2003) Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril 80: 1413-1419.
  • Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y (2002) Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl 23: 1-8.
  • Bellastella G, Cooper TG, Battaglia M, Ströse A, Torres I, Hellenkemper B, Soler C, Sinisi AA (2010) Dimensions of human ejaculated spermatozoa in Papanicolaou-stained seminal and swim-up smears obtained from the Integrated Semen Analysis System (ISAS(®)). Asian J Androl 12: 871-879.
  • Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Ellenbogen A, Peer S, Feldberg D, Bartoov B (2006) Does the presence of nuclear vacuoles in human sperm selected for ICSI affect pregnancy outcome? Hum Reprod 21: 1787-1790.
  • Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, Katz N, Barr I, Fishman A, Bartoov B (2005) The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod 20: 185-190.
  • Bielanska M, Tan SL, Ao A (2000) Fluorescence in-situ hybridization of sex chromosomes in spermatozoa and spare preimplantation embryos of a Klinefelter 46,XY/47,XXY male. Hum Reprod 15: 440-444.
  • Blanchard M, Haguenoer K, Apert A, Poret H, Barthélémy C, Roymre D, Guèrif F (2011) Sperm morphology assessment using David’s classification: time to switch to strict criteria? Prospective comparative analysis in a selected IVF population. Int J Androl 34: 145-152.
  • Brazil C (2010) Practical semen analysis: from A to Z. Asian J Androl 12: 14-20.
  • Brito LF, Greene LM, Kelleman A, Knobbe M, Turner R (2011) Effect of method and clinician on stallion sperm morphology evaluation. Theriogenology 76: 745-750.
  • Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, Spano M, Bungum L, Erenpreiss J, Giwercman A (2007) Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod 22: 174-179.
  • Butts IA, Ward MA, Litvak MK, Pitcher TE, Alavi SM, Trippel EA, Rideout RM (2011) Automated sperm head morphology analyzer for open-source software. Theriogenology 76: 1756-1761.
  • Cassuto NG, Bouret D, Plouchart JM, Jellad S, Vanderzwalmen P, Balet R, Larue L, Barak Y (2009) A new real-time morphology classification for human spermatozoa: a link for fertilization and improved embryo quality. Fertil Steril 92: 1616-1625.
  • Celik-Ozenci C, Catalanotti J, Jakab A, Aksu C, Ward D, Bray-Ward P, Demir R, Huszar G (2003) Human sperm maintain their shape following decondensation and denaturation for fluorescent in situ hybridization: shape analysis and objective morphometry. Biol Reprod 69: 1347-1355.
  • Chemes HE, Alvarez Sedo C (2012) Tales of the tail and sperm head aches: changing concepts on the prognostic significance of sperm pathologies affecting the head, neck and tail. Asian J Androl 14: 14-23.
  • Collodel G, Capitani S, Iacoponi F, Federico MG, Pascarelli NA, Moretti E (2009a) Retrospective assessment of potential negative synergistic effects of varicocele and tobacco use on ultrastructural sperm morphology. Urology. 74: 794-799.
  • Collodel G, Giannerini V, Antonio Pascarelli N, Federico MG, Comodo F, Moretti E (2009b) TEM and FISH studies in sperm from men of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Andrologia 41: 352-360.
  • Collodel G, Iacoponi F, Mazzi L, Terzuoli G, Pascarelli NA, Moretti E (2013) Light, polarizing, and transmission electron microscopy: three methods for the evaluation of sperm quality. Syst Biol Reprod Med 59: 27-33.
  • Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HWG, Behre HM, Haugen TB, Kruger T, Wang C, Mbizvo MT, Vogelsong KM (2010) World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 16: 231-245.
  • Cooper TG, Yeung CH, Fetic S, Sobhani A, Nieschlag E (2004) Cytoplasmic droplets are normal structures of human sperm but are not well preserved by routine procedures for assessing sperm morphology. Hum Reprod 19: 2283-2288.
  • Cui KH (1997) Size differences between human X and Y spermatozoa and prefertilization diagnosis. Mol Hum Reprod 3: 61-67.
  • Cui KH, Matthews CD (1993) X larger than Y. Nature 366: 117-118.
  • de Vantery Arrighi C, Lucas H, Chardonnens D, de Agostini A (2009) Removal of spermatozoa with externalized phosphatidylserine from sperm preparation in human assisted medical procreation: effects on viability, motility and mitochondrial membrane potential. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 8:1.
  • Einarsson S, Dalin AM, Lundeheim N (2009) Sperm production and sperm morphology of Swedish Warmblood stallions. Reprod Domest Anim 44: 33-36.
  • El-Ghobashy AA, West CR (2003) The human sperm head: a key for successful fertilization. J Androl 24: 232-238.
  • Enciso M, Cisale H, Johnston SD, Sarasa J, Fernández JL, Gosálvez J (2011) Major morphological sperm abnormalities in the bull are related to sperm DNA damage. Theriogenology 76: 23-32.
  • Erenpreisa J, Erenpreiss J, Freivalds T, Slaidina M, Krampe R, Butikova J, Ivanov A, Pjanova D (2003) Toluidine blue test for sperm DNA integrity and elaboration of image cytometry algorithm. Cytometry 52: 19-27.
  • Erenpreiss J, Bars J, Lipatnikova V, Erenpreisa J, Zalkalns J (2001) Comparative study of cytochemical tests for sperm chromatin integrity. J Androl 22: 45-53.
  • Fernandez MF, Duran I, Olea N, Avivar C, Vierula M, Toppari J, Skakkebaek NE, Jzrgensen N (2012) Semen quality and reproductive hormone levels in men from Southern Spain. Int J Androl 35: 1-10.
  • Ford WC (2010) Comments on the release of the 5th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl 12: 59-63.
  • Franco JG Jr, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Massaro FC, Silva LF, Felipe V, Cavagna M, Pontes A, Baruffi RL, Oliveira JB, Vagnini LD (2012) Large nuclear vacuoles are indicative of abnormal chromatin packaging in human spermatozoa. Int J Androl 35: 46-51.
  • Freneau GE, Chenoweth PJ, Ellis R, Rupp G (2010) Sperm morphology of beef bulls evaluated by two different methods. Anim Reprod Sci 118: 176-81.
  • Garner DL (2009) Hoechst 33342: The dye that enabled differentiation of living X- and Y-chromosome bearing mammalian sperm. Theriogenol 71: 11-21.
  • Gatimel N, Léandri RD, Foliguet B, Bujan L, Parinaud J (2013) Sperm cephalic vacuoles: new arguments for their non acrosomal origin in two cases of total globozoospermia. Andrology 1: 52-56.
  • Gergely A, Kovanci E, Senturk L, Cosmi E, Vigue L, Huszar G (1999) Morphometric assessment of mature and diminished-maturity human spermatozoa: sperm regions that reflect differences in maturity. Hum Reprod 14: 2007-2014.
  • Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Collodel G, Moretti E, Ferraretti AP, Baccetti B (2008) Sperm head’s birefringence: a new criterion for sperm selection. Fertil Steril 90: 104-112.
  • Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Crippa A, Boudjema E, Ferraretti AP (2011) The value of IMSI and birefringence. Reprod BioMed Online 22: S100.
  • Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Crippa A, Lappi M, Capitani S, Baccetti B (2010) Birefringence characteristics in sperm heads allow for the selection of reacted spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 93: 807-813.
  • Gomez-Lopez N, Estrada-Gutierrez G, Colin A, Flores-Pliego A, Flores-Escobar X, Oehninger S, Barroso G (2013) The apoptotic pathway in fertile and subfertile men: a case-control and prospective study to examine the impact of merocyanine 540 bodies on ejaculated spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 99: 1242-1248.
  • Grow DR, Oehninger S, Seltman HJ, Toner JP, Swanson RJ, Kruger TF, Muasher SJ (1994) Sperm morphology as diagnosed by strict criteria: probing the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in a large in vitro fertilization population. Fertil Steril 62: 559-567.
  • Haugen TB, Egeland T, Magnus O (2006) Semen parameters in Norwegian fertile men. J Androl 27: 66-71.
  • Janett F, Hussy D, Lischer C, Hässig M, Thun R (2001) Semen characteristics after vasectomy in the ram. Theriogenology 56: 485-491.
  • Jørgensen N, Andersen AG, Eustache F, Irvine DS, Suominen J, Petersen JH, Andersen AN, Auger J, Cawood EH, Horte A, Jensen TK, Jouannet P, Keiding N, Vierula M, Toppari J, Skakkebaek NE (2001) Regional differences in semen quality in Europe. Hum Reprod 16: 1012-1019.
  • Jørgensen N, Carlsen E, Nermoen I, Punab M, Suominen J, Andersen AG, Andersson AM, Haugen TB, Horte A, Jensen TK, Magnus Ö, Petersen JH, Vierula M, Toppari J, Skakkebaek NE (2002) East-West gradient in semen quality in the Nordic-Baltic area: a study of men from the general population in Denmark, Norway, Estonia and Finland. Hum Reprod 17: 2199-2208.
  • Jouannet P, Ducot B, Feneux D, Spira A (1988) Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristics. Int J Androl 11: 379-394.
  • Karabinus DS (2009) Flow cytometric sorting of human sperm: MicroSort clinical trial update. Theriogenology 71: 74-79.
  • Kavak A, Lundeheim N, Aidnik M, Einarsson S (2004) Sperm morphology in Estonian and Tori breed stallions. Acta Vet Scand 45: 11-18.
  • Kawakami E, Ozawa T, Hirano T, Hori T, Tsutsui T (2005) Formation of detached tail and coiled tail of sperm in a beagle dog. J Vet Med Sci 67: 83-85.
  • Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S (1988) Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 49: 112-117.
  • Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, Smith K (1986) Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 46: 1118-1123.
  • Lambrechts H, van Niekerk FE, Cloete SW, Coetzer WA, van der Horst G (2000) Sperm viability and morphology of two genetically diverse Merino lines. Reprod Fertil Dev 12: 337-344.
  • Lange-Consiglio A, Antonucci N, Manes S, Corradetti B, Cremonesi F, Bizzaro D (2010) Morphometric characteristics and chromatin integrity of spermatozoa in three Italian dog breeds. J Small Anim Pract 51: 624-627.
  • Lasiene K, Lasys V, Glinskyte S, Valanciute A, Vitkus A (2011) Relevance and methodology for the morphological analysis of oocyte quality in IVF and ICSI. J Reprod Stem Cell Biotechnol 2: 1-13.
  • Lasiene K, Vitkus A, Valanciute A, Lasys V (2009) Morphological criteria of oocyte quality. Medicina (Kaunas) 45: 509-515.
  • Lazaros LA, Vartholomatos GA, Hatzi EG, Kaponis AI, Makrydimas GV, Kalantaridou SN, Sofikitis NV, Stefos TI, Zikopoulos KA, Georgiou IA (2011) Assessment of sperm chromatin condensation and ploidy status using flow cytometry correlates to fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy following in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 28: 885-891.
  • Lee JD, Kamiguchi Y, Yanagimachi R (1996) Analysis of chromosome constitution of human spermatozoa with normal and aberrant head morphologies after injection into mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod 11: 1942-1946.
  • López Armengol MF, Jurado SB, Pelufo V, Aisen EG (2012) A quantitative ultramorphological approach for systematic assessment of sperm head regions: an example in rams. Cryobiology 64: 223-234.
  • López-Teijón M, Elbaile M, Alvarez JG (2008) Geographical differences in semen quality in a population of young healthy volunteers from the different regions of Spain. Andrology 40: 318-328.
  • Love CC (2011) Relationship between sperm motility, morphology and the fertility of stallions. Theriogenology 76: 547-557.
  • Magli MC, Crippa A, Muzii L, Boudjema E, Capoti A, Scaravelli G, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L (2012) Head birefringence properties are associated with acrosome reaction, sperm motility and morphology. Reprod Biomed Online 24: 352-359.
  • Mahfouz RZ, Sharma RK, Said TM, Erenpreiss J, Agarwal A (2009) Association of sperm apoptosis and DNA ploidy with sperm chromatin quality in human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 91: 1110-1118.
  • Mandal DK, Kumar M, Tyagi S (2010) Effect of age on spermiogram of Holstein Friesian \ Sahiwal crossbred bulls. Animal 4: 595-603.
  • Maree L, du Plessis SS, Menkveld R, van der Horst G (2010) Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod 25: 1369-1382.
  • Menkveld R (2010) Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl 12: 47-58.
  • Menkveld R, Holleboom CA, Rhemrev JP (2011) Measurement and significance of sperm morphology. Asian J Androl 13: 59-68.
  • Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, Van Zyl JA (1990) The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 5: 586-592.
  • Menkveld R, Wong WY, Lombard CJ, Wetzels AM, Thomas CM, Merkus HM, Steegers-Theunissen RP (2001) Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod 16: 1165-1171.
  • Mokánszki A, Molnár Z, Ujfalusi A, Balogh E, Bazsáné ZK, Varga A, Jakab A, Oláh É (2012) Correlation study between sperm concentration, hyaluronic acid-binding capacity and sperm aneuploidy in Hungarian patients. Reprod Biomed Online 25: 620-626.
  • Montjean D, Belloc S, Benkhalifa M, Dalleac A, Ménézo Y (2012) Sperm vacuoles are linked to capacitation and acrosomal status. Hum Reprod 27: 2927-2932.
  • Moretti E, Federico MG, Giannerini V, Collodel G (2008) Sperm ultrastructure and meiotic segregation in a group of patients with chronic hepatitis B and C. Andrologia 40: 286-291.
  • Morrell JM, Johannisson A, Dalin AM, Hammar L, Sandebert T, Rodriguez-Martinez H (2008) Sperm morphology and chromatin integrity in Swedish warmblood stallions and their relationship to pregnancy rates. Acta Vet Scand 50:2.
  • Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, White J, Mullen JB (2009) Sperm DNA damage: correlation to severity of semen abnormalities. Urology 74: 789-793.
  • Nadalini M, Tarozzi N, Distratis V, Scaravelli G, Borini A (2009) Impact of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection on assisted reproduction outcome: a review. Reprod Biomed Online 19: S45-55.
  • Núñez-Martinez I, Moran JM, Peña FJ (2005) Do computer-assisted, morphometric-derived sperm characteristics reflect DNA status in canine spermatozoa? Reprod Domest Anim 40: 537-543.
  • O’Connell M, McClure N, Lewis SE (2002) The effects of cryopreservation on sperm morphology, motility and mitochondrial function. Hum Reprod 17: 704-709.
  • Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Nicoletti AP, Baruffi RL, Franco JG Jr (2009) Motile sperm organelle morphology examination is stricter than Tygerberg criteria. Reprod Biomed Online 18: 320-326.
  • Oosterhuis GJ, Vermes I (2004) Apoptosis in human ejaculated spermatozoa. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 18: 115-119.
  • Peña AI, Barrio M, Becerra JJ, Quintela LA, Herradón PG (2007) Infertility in a dog due to proximal cytoplasmic droplets in the ejaculate: investigation of the significance for sperm functionality in vitro. Reprod Domest Anim 42: 471-478.
  • Perdrix A, Travers A, Chelli MH, Escalier D, Do Rego JL, Milazzo JP, Mousset-Siméon N, Macé B, Rives N (2011) Assessment of acrosome and nuclear abnormalities in human spermatozoa with large vacuoles. Hum Reprod 26: 47-58.
  • Perdrix A, Travers A, Clatot F, Sibert L, Mitchell V, Jumeau F, Macé B, Rives N (2013) Modification of chromosomal architecture in human spermatozoa with large vacuoles. Andrology 1: 57-66.
  • Petersen CG, Vagnini LD, Mauri AL, Massaro FC, Cavagna M, Baruffi RL, Oliveira JB, Franco JG Jr (2011) Relationship between DNA damage and sperm head birefringence. Reprod Biomed Online 22: 583-589.
  • Punab M, Zilaitiene B, Jzrgensen N, Horte A, Matulevicius V, Peetsalu A, Skakkebaek NE (2002) Regional differences in semen qualities in the Baltic region. Int J Androl 25: 243-252.
  • Revay T, Nagy S, Kopp C, Flyckt A, Rens W, Rath D, Hidas A, Kovacs A, Johannisson A, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Andersson M (2009) Macrocephaly in bull spermatozoa is associated with nuclear vacuoles, diploidy and alteration of chromatin condensation. Cytogenet Genome Res 126: 202-209.
  • Ricci G, Perticarari S, Fragonas E, Giolo E, Canova S, Pozzobon C, Guaschino S, Presani G (2002) Apoptosis in human sperm: its correlation with semen quality and the presence of leukocytes. Hum Reprod 17: 2665-2672.
  • Ruvolo G, Roccheri MC, Brucculeri AM, Longobardi S, Cittadini E, Bosco L (2013) Lower sperm DNA fragmentation after r-FSH administration in functional hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Assist Reprod Genet 30: 497-503.
  • Rylander L, Wetterstrand B, Haugen TB, Malm G, Malm J, Bjørsvik C, Henrichsen T, Saether T, Giwercman A (2009) Single semen analysis as a predictor of semen quality: clinical and epidemiological implications. Asian J Androl 11: 723-730.
  • Sermondade N, Hafhouf E, Dupont C, Bechoua S, Palacios C, Eustache F, Poncelet C, Benzacken B, Lévy R, Sifer C (2011) Successful childbirth after intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection without assisted oocyte activation in a patient with globozoospermia. Hum Reprod 26: 2944-2949.
  • Sermondade N, Sifer C (2011) Motile sperm organelle morphology examination: toward a consensus? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 39: 309-314.
  • Silva LF, Oliveira JB, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Massaro FC, Cavagna M, Baruffi RL, Franco JG Jr (2012) The effects of male age on sperm analysis by motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 10: 19.
  • Skakkebaek NE (2010) Normal reference ranges for semen quality and their relations to fecundity. Asian J Androl 12: 95-98.
  • Skowronek F, Casanova G, Alciaturi J, Capurro A, Cantu L, Montes JM, Sapiro R (2012) DNA sperm damage correlates with nuclear ultrastructural sperm defects in teratozoospermic men. Andrologia 44: 59-65.
  • Skowronek MF, Alciaturi J, Casanova G, Capurro A, Montes JM, Sapiro R (2010) Value of quantitative ultramorphological sperm analysis in infertile men. Reprod Biol 10(2): 125-139.
  • Sukcharoen N, Keith J, Irvine DS, Aitken RJ (1995) Definition of the optimal criteria for identifying hyperactivated human spermatozoa at 25 Hz using in-vitro fertilization as a functional end-point. Hum Reprod 10: 2928-2937.
  • Sweeney T, Fox J, Robertson L, Kelly G, Duffy P, Lonergan P, O’doherty J, Roche JF, Evans NP (2007) Postnatal exposure to octylphenol decreases semen quality in the adult ram. Theriogenology 67: 1068-1075.
  • Tang SS, Gao H, Zhao Y, Ma S (2010) Aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation in morphologically abnormal sperm. Int J Androl 33: e163-179.
  • Tapia S, Rojas M, Morales P, Ramirez MA, Diaz ES (2011) The laminin-induced acrosome reaction in human sperm is mediated by Src kinases and the roteasome. Biol Reprod 85: 357-366.
  • Tesarik J, Drahorad J, Peknicova J (1988) Subcellular immunochemical localization of acrosin in human spermatozoa during the acrosome reaction and zona pellucida penetration. Fertil Steril 50: 133-141.
  • Ubaldi F, Rienzi L (2008) Morphological selection of gametes. Placenta 29: S115-S120.
  • van der Horst G, Maree L (2009) SpermBlue: a new universal stain for human and animal sperm which is also amenable to automated sperm morphology analysis. Biotech Histochem 84: 299-308.
  • Vigil P, Barrientos VM, Vargas GG, Machuca DA, Cortés ME (2012) Assessment of the effect of testosterone on the acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa. Andrologia 44: S627-633.
  • Vigil P, Toro A, Godoy A (2008) Physiological action of oestradiol on the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. Andrologia 40: 146-151.
  • Visco V, Raffa S, Elia J, Delfino M, Imbrogno N, Torrisi MR, Mazzilli F (2010) Morphological sperm defects analyzed by light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy and their correlation with sperm motility. Int J Urol 17: 259-266.
  • World Health Organization (1999) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed., Cambridge University Press.
  • World Health Organization (2010) WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed., Cambridge University Press.
  • Zhou D, Xia Y, Li Y, Song L, Hu F, Lu C, Zhou Z, Sha J, Wang X. (2011) Higher proportion of haploid round spermatids and spermatogenic disomy rate in relation to idiopathic male infertility. Urology 77: 77-82.
  • Zou Y, Yin T, Chen S, Yang J, Huang W (2013) On-chip cryopreservation: a novel method for ultra-rapid cryoprotectant-free cryopreservation of small amounts of human spermatozoa. PLoS One 8: e61593.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-05f29623-637e-4920-b4b1-36e78ee837c5
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.