Effect of cryoprotectants on the mobility and the morphological integrity of muscovy spermatozoa

• Autorzy: Gerzilov V. , Kazachka D. , Jeleva S. , Petrov P. , Sabev M. , Nikolov I.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ środków krioochronnych na ruchliwość i integralność morfologiczną plemników kaczek piżmowych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

PL

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu. Biologia i Hodowla Zwierząt
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 62
• Opis fizyczny: p.157-165,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Gerzilov V.

• Department of Animal Sciences, Agricultural University Plovdiv, Bulgaria

autor

Kazachka D.

autor

Jeleva S.

autor

Petrov P.

autor

Sabev M.

autor

Nikolov I.

Bibliografia

• Bakst M.R., Cecil H.C., 1997. Nigrosin/eosin stain for determining live/dead and abnormal sperm counts, [in:] Bakst M.R., Wishart G.J. Techniques for semen evaluation, semen storage and fertility determination. PSA, Savoy, I.L. (Eds): 29-35.
• Blesbois E., Brillard J-P., 2007. Specific features of in vivo and in vitro sperm storage in birds. Animal, 1(10): 1472-1481.
• Blesbois E., 2007. Current status in avian semen cryopreservation. World's Poultry Science Journal, 63: 213-222.
• Blesbois E., Grasseau I. Seigneurin F., Mignon-Grasteau S., Saint Jalme M., Mialon-Richard M.M., 2008. Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens. Theriogenology, 69: 252¬261.
• Cassou R., 1964. La methode les paillettes en plastique et son adaptation a la generalization de la congelation. Comptes rendus de l'Académie d'agriculture de France, 50: 881-887 (in French).
• Chalah T., Seigneurin F., Blesbois E., Brillard J.P., 1999. In vitro comparison of fowl sperm viability in ejaculates frozen by three different techniques and relationship with subsequent fertility in vivo. Cryobiology, 39: 185-191.
• Donoghue A.M., Wishart G.J., 2000. Storage of poultry semen. Animal Reproduction Science, 62: 213-232.
• Gerzilov V., 2000. A method for obtaining of semen from the species Muscovy duck (Cairina moschata). Zhivotnov dni nauki (Journal of Animal Science), 37 (4): 56-63 (in Bulgarian).
• Gerzilov V., 2003. A study of sperm production of Muscovy drakes (Cairina moschata) and the possibility for receiving of mule ducks by artificial insemination of Pekin ducks (Anas platy- rhynchos). PhD Thesis: 150 (in Bulgarian).
• Gerzilov V., 2010. Influence of various cryoprotectants on the sperm mobility of Muscovy semen before and after cryopreservation. Agricultural science and technology, 2 (2): 57-60.
• Hammerstedt R.H., Graham J. K., 1992. Cryopreservation of poultry sperm: The enigma of glycerol. Cryobiology, 29: 26-28
• Hammerstedt R.H., 1995. Cryopreservation of poultry semen - current status and economics, [in:] Bakst M.R., Wishart G.J. Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on the Artificial Insemination of Poultry. Poultry Science Association, Savoy, IL: 229-250.
• Han X.F., Niu Z.Y., Liu F.Z., Yang C.S., 2005. Effects of diluents, cryoprotectants, equilibration time and thawing temperature on cryopreservation of duck semen. International Journal of Poultry Science, 4(4): 197-201.
• Herrera J.A., Quintata J. A., Lopez M. A., Betancourt M., Fierro R., 2005. Individual cryopreserva¬tion with dimethyl sulfoxide and polyvinylpyrolidone of ejaculates and pooled semen of three avian species. Archives of Andrology, 51: 353-360.
• Holt W.V., 2000. Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen. Animal Reproduction Science, 62: 3-22.
• Kasyanenko S.V., Kurbatov A.D., 1986. Drake sperm cryopreservation. Ptitsevodstvo, 6: 27-28 (in Russian).
• Krustev H., Danov D., Dorosieva K., 1973. A new method for electron- microscopic study of spermatozoa. Annali. High Veterinary Medical Institute, 23: 127-133 (in Bulgarian).
• Lake P.E., Ravie O., 1982. Dimethylacetamide as a cryoprotectant for fowl spermatozoa. Poultry Science, 61: 1497-1498.
• Long J.A., 2006. Avian Semen Cryopreservation: What Are the Biological Challenges. Poultry Science, 85: 232-236.
• Łukaszewicz E., Chrzanowska M., Jerysz A., Chełmońska B., 2004. Attempts on freezing the Greylag (Anser anser L.) gander semen. Animal Reproduction Science, 80: 163-173.
• Łukaszewicz E. 2002. An effective method for freezing White Italian gander semen. Theriogenology, 58: 19-27.
• Łukaszewicz E., Kruszynski W., 2003. Evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed semen of individual ganders by assessment of spermatozoa motility and morphology. Theriogenology, 59:1627¬1640.
• Łukaszewicz E., 2001. DMF effects on frozen gander semen. British Poultry Science, 42: 308-314.
• Maeda T., Terada T. Tsutsumi Y., 1984. Morphological observations on frozen and thawed muscovy spermatozoa. British Poultry Science, 25: 409-13.
• Polge C., 1951. Functional survival of fowl spermatozoa after freezing at -70° C. Nature, 167: 949-950.
• Polge C., Smith A., Parkes A., 1949. Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature, 164: 666.
• Schramm G.P., Hubner R., 1988. Effects of different cryoprotectives and deep freeze techniques on the reproductive potential of turkey sperm after prolonged storage. Monatshefte für Veterinärmedizin, 43: 426-427.
• Surai P.F., Wishart G.J., 1996. Poultry artificial insemination technology in the countries of the former USSR. World's Poultry Science Journal, 52: 227-243.
• Tai J.J.L., Chen J.C., Wu K.C., Wang S.D., Tai C., 2001. Cryopreservation of gander semen. British Poultry Science, 42: 384-388
• Tan N.S., 1980. The training of drakes for semen collection. Annales de Zootechnie, 29 (2): 93¬102.
• Tselutin K., Narubinal L., Mavrodina T., Tur B., 1995.Cryopreservation of poultry semen. British Poultry Science, 36: 805-811.
• Tselutin K., Seigneurin F., Blesbois E., 1999. Comparison of cryoprotectants and methods of cryopreservation of fowl spermatozoa. Poultry Science, 78: 586-590.
• Xia L.J., Lalli M.F., Ansah G.A. and Buckland R.B., 1988. Ultrastructure of fresh and frozen- thawed spermatozoa of high and low fertility lines of chickens. Poultry Science, 67: 819-825.