PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 67 | 10 |

Tytuł artykułu

Ultrasonografia wzmacniana kontrastem (CEUS) - zastosowanie kliniczne

Warianty tytułu

EN
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) – Clinical application

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is mainly used in heart examination and to detect and characterize focal liver lesions. CEUS also allows the evaluation of the spleen, pancreas, kidneys, lymph nodes and the detection of porto-systemic shunts. UCAs can be administered intracavitarily, e.g. in the urinary bladder. In human medicine CEUS is used in the assessment of anti-angiogenic treatment. In some cases concerning the detection and characterization of focal lesions in such organs as the liver, spleen and kidneys, CEUS is equally or more efficient than CECT. The advantages of CEUS are: non-invasiveness, high availability, short examination time, low cost expenses and good patient tolerance compared to contrast agents use in CECT and CEMRI. The appearance of UCAs decreased the gap dividing the diagnostic value of USG and CT/MRI and also allows the characterization of neoplastic lesions without the need of invasion biopsy and diagnostic laparatomy.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

67

Numer

10

Opis fizyczny

s.669-672,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor
  • Katedra Diagnostyki Klinicznej, Wydział Medycyny Weterynaryjnej, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, ul.Oczapowskiego 14, 10-719 Olsztyn
autor
autor
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • 1.Albrecht T.: Dynamic vascular pattern of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Latest results with SonoVue. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Clinical Practice. Springer, Milan 2005, 3-22.
  • 2.Albrecht T., Blomley M., Bolondi L., Claudon M., Correas J.-M., Cosgrove D., Greiner L., Jäger K., Jong N. de, Leen E., Lencioni R., Lindsell D., Martegani A., Solbiati L., Thorelius L., Tranquart F., Weskott H. P., Whittingham T.: Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 2004, 25, 249-256.
  • 3.Bahr A., Wrigley R., Salman M.: Quantitative evaluation of imagent as an abdominal ultrasound contrast medium in dogs. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2000, 41, 50-55.
  • 4.Caruso G., Salvaggio G., Campisi A., Melloni D., Midiri M., Bertolotto M., Lagalla R.: Bladder Tumor Staging: Comparison of Contrast-enhanced And Gray-scale Ultrasound. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010, 194, 151-156.
  • 5.Chung W., Choi H., Lee K., Lee H., Choi M., Yoon J.: Quantitative Evaluation of Contrast enhanced Transcranial Doppler Signal Rusing galactose Based Echo-Contrast Agent In Dogs. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2006, 68, 597-601.
  • 6.D'Onofrio M., Gallotti A., Principe F., Mucelli R.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the pancreas. World J. Radiol. 2010, 3, 97-102.
  • 7.Gaschen L., Schur D., Kearney M.: Contrast harmonic ultrasound imaging of the normal pancreas and pancreatitis in dogs. Proc. Am. Coll. Vet. Radiol. Ann. Sci. Meeting, Chicago 2007, s. 21.
  • 8.Görg C.: The forgotten organ: Contrast enhanced sonography of the spleen. Eur. J. Radiol. 2007, 64, 189-201.
  • 9.Haers H., Saunders J.: Review of clinical characteristics and applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2009, 234, 460-470.
  • 10.Haers H., Vignoli M., Paes G., Rossi., Taeymans O., Daminet S., Suanders J.: Contrast Harmonic Ultrasonographic Appearance of Focal Space-occupying Renal Lesions. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2010, 51, 516-522.
  • 11.Hause A., Kiefer I., Succow D., Bosch B., Oechtering G.: Hepatic transit time of the signal enhancer SonoVue in the dog. Proc. Int. Vet. Radiol. Assoc. Meeting, Vancouver 2006, s. 38.
  • 12.Hocke M., Menges M., Topalidis T., Dietrich C. F., Stallmach A.: Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between benign and malignant mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 134, 473-480.
  • 13.Höglund K., Bussadori C., Domenech O., Häggström J., Pradelli D., Kvart C.: Contrast echocardiography in Boxer dogs with and without aortic stenosis. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2007, 9, 15-24.
  • 14.Ivancic-Arndt M., Seiler G.: Contrast Harmonic Ultrasound of Splenic Hemangiosarcoma and Associated Liver Nodules in Dogs. Proc. Am. Coll. Vet. Radiol. Ann. Sci. Meeting, Chicago 2007, s. 19.
  • 15.Kinns J., Aronson L., Hauptman J., Seiler G.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the feline kidney. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2010, 51, 168-172.
  • 16.Kitzman D. W., Goldman M. E., Gillam L. D., Cohen J. L., Aurigemma G. P., Gottdiener J. S.: Efficacy and safety of the novel ultrasound contrast agent perflutren (Definity) in patients with suboptimal baseline left ventricular echocardiographic images. Am. J. Cardiol. 2000, 86, 669-674.
  • 17.Maresca G., Summaria V., Colagrande C., Manfredi R., Calliada F.: New prospects for ultrasound contrast agents. Eur. J. Radiol. 1998, 27(suppl 2), 171-178.
  • 18.Maruyama H., Matsutani S., Saisho H., Mine Y., Kamiyama N., Hirata T., Sasamata M.: Real-time blood-pool images of contrast enhanced ultrasound with Definity in the detection of tumour nodules in the liver. Br. J. Radiol. 2005, 78, 512-518.
  • 19.Nanda N. C., Wistran D. C., Karlsberg R. P., Hack T. C., Smith W. B., Foley D. A., Picard M. H., Cotter B.: Multicenter evaluation of SonoVue for improved endocardial border delineation. Echocardiography 2002, 19, 27-36.
  • 20.Nyman H., Kristensen A., Flagstad A., McEvoy F.: A review of the sonographic assessment of tumor metastases in liver and superficial lymph nodes. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2004, 45,438-448.
  • 21.Nyman H., Kristensen A., Kjelgaard-Hansen M., McEvoy F.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in normal canine liver. Evaluation of imaging and safety parameters. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2005, 46, 243-250.
  • 22.O'Brien R. T.: Improved detection of metastatic hepatic hemangiosarcoma nodules with contrast ultrasound in three dogs. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2007, 48, 146-148.
  • 23.O'Brien R. T., Iani M., Matheson J., Delaney F., Young K.: Contrast harmonic ultrasound of spontaneous liver nodules in 32 dogs. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2004, 45, 547-553.
  • 24.Ohlerth S., Dennler M., Rüefli E., Hauser B., Poirier V., Siebeck N., Roos M., Kaser-Hotz B.: Contrast harmonic imaging characterization of canine splenic lesions. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 1095-1102.
  • 25.Ohlerth S., O'Brien R.: Contrast ultrasound: General principles and veterinary clinical applications. Vet. J. 2007, 174, 501-512.
  • 26.Ohlerth S., Rüefli E., Poirier V., Ross M., Kaser-Hotz B.: Contrast harmonic imaging of the normal canine spleen. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2007, 48, 451-456.
  • 27.Ohlerth S., Rüefli E., Rohrer Bley C., Sieber-Ruckstuhl N., Melzer K., Kaser-Hotz B.: Assessment of tissue perfusion in the normal canine spleen with contrast harmonic imaging. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2005, 47, 110.
  • 28.Rademacher N., Ohlerth S., Scharf G., Laluhova D., Alt N., Sieber N., Roos M., Kaser-Hotz B.: Ultrasonographic changes of the feline pancreatic architecture, vascularity and perfusion. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2006, 47, 109.
  • 29.Rademacher N., Ohlerth S., Scharf G., Laluhova D., Sieber-Ruckstuhl N., Alt M., Ross M., Grest P., Kaser-Hotz B.: Contrast-enhanced Power and Color Doppler ultrasonography of the pancreas in helathy and diseased cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 1310-1316.
  • 30.Russo M., Vignoli M., Catone G., Rossi F., Attanasi G., England G. C. W.: Prostatic perfusion in the dog using Contrast-Enhanced Doppler Ultrasound. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44, (Suppl. 2), 334-335.
  • 31.Salwei R. M., O'Brien R. T., Matheson J. S.: Characterisation of lymphomatous lymph nodes in dogs using contrast harmonic and Power Doppler ultrasound. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2005, 46, 411-416.
  • 32.Salwei R. M., O'Brien R. T., Matheson J. S.: Use of Contrast Harmonic Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Congenital Portosystemic Shunts in Three Dogs. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2003, 44, 301-305.
  • 33.Sartori S., Nielsen I., Trevisani L., Tombesi P., Ceccotti P., Abbasciano V.: Contrast-enhanced sonography as guidance for transthoracic biopsy of a peripheral lung lesion with large necrotic areas. J. Ultrasound Med. 2004, 23, 133-136.
  • 34.Schoeppler G. M., Buchner A., Zaak D., Khoder W., Staehler M., Stief C. G., Reiser M. F., Clevert D.-A.: Detection of urinary leakage after radical retropubic prostatectomy by contrast enhanced ultrasound - do we still need conventional retrograde cystography? Brit. J. Urol. 2010, 106, 1632-1637.
  • 35.Sever A., Broillet A., Schneider M., Cox K., Jones S., Weeks J., Mills P., Fish D., Jones P.: Dynamic Visualization of Lymphatic Channels and Sentinel Lymph Nodes Using Intradermal Microbubbles and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in a Swine Model and Patients With Breast Cancer. J. Ultrasound Med. 2010, 29, 1699-1704.
  • 36.Sever A., Jones S., Cox K., Weeks J., Mills P., Jones P.: Preoperative localization of sentinel lymph nodes using intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer. Brit. J. Surg. 2009, 96, 1295-1299.
  • 37.Solbiati L., Cova L.: Improved Characterization of Reactive and Malignant Lymph Nodes Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Clinical Practice. Springer, Milan 2005, 37-50.
  • 38.Sperandeo M., Sperandeo G., Varriale A., Filabozzi P., Decuzzi M., Dimitri L., Vendemiale G.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the study of peripheral lung lesions: A preliminary study. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006, 32, 1467-1472.
  • 39.Su H. L., Qian Y. Q., Wei Z. R., He J. G., Li G. Q., Zhang J., Zhou X. D., Jing W.: Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography in rat: infusion versus bolus administration. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2009, 35, 748-755.
  • 40.Waller K. R., O'Brien R. T., Zagzebski J. A.: Quantitative contrast ultrasound analysis of renal perfusion in normal dogs. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2007, 48, 373-377.
  • 41.Wang Y., Wang W., Li J., Tang J.: Gray-Scale Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Of Sentinel Lymph Nodes In A Metastatic Breast Cancer Model. Acad. Radiol. 2009, 16, 957-962.
  • 42.Wdowiak M., Rychlik A., Nieradka R., Nowicki M.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in canine liver examination. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2010, 13, 767-773.
  • 43.Ziegler L. E., O'Brien R. T., Waller K. R., Zagrzebski J. A.: Quantitative contrast harmonic imaging of normal canine liver. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2003, 44, 451-454.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-048a593c-4c19-4d83-bfdd-b693a77a75d0
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.