Ograniczanie wyników

Czasopisma help
Autorzy help
Lata help
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 110

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 6 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  wycinanie drzew
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 6 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
Aura
|
2006
|
nr 07
9-12
Several NGOs have sent an appeal against „taking actions to cut down all the trees growing on the sides of public roads” to state authorities, e. g. provincial police headquarters, companies managing roads and local governments. They justify this by concern for the safety of motor transport. The author discusses the problem of roadside trees and tree avenues in historic, cultural, biological, environmental, technological, educational and landscape aspects and concludes: it should be clearly stated that road accidents are not caused by trees, but imprudent drivers. He also recalls what should be done to prevent the further devastation of roadside green belts.
I reviewed the ecological and socio-political issues associated with wildfires in North America. I focused on three management practices: (1) restoration of “healthy” forests in western US, (2) postfire (salvage) logging, and (3) the use of ciearcutting to imitate natural disturbances (so called “emulation silviculture”). It has been argued that fire suppression in forests historically dominated by Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) has resulted in changes in their structure and species composition, accumulation of fuels, and increased frequency and area of severe fires (Fig. 1). These problems are being addressed by thinning and prescribed burning, but implementing these actions in mid- and high-elevation forests is controversial because these forests have not been impacted by fire suppression. Salvage logging is intended to recoup economic losses, enhance regeneration and reduce fire risk. However, recent research indicates that postfire logging achieves only the first goal, while hindering regeneration and increasing woody fuel loads. Forest harvest is unlikely to substitute wildfires because of differences in size distribution, frequency, and ecological consequences of the anthropogenic and natural disturbances. While the important ecological role of forest fires is being increasingly recognized, fire management is still facing unresolved problems. Moreover, the ongoing climate warming will make it even more challenging.
Cutting trees in built-up areas is sometimes an disagreeable necessity. Generally, it should be avoided, although sometimes it is impossible. The authors deal with such situations in formal and legal terms: permits, fees, costs, etc. From a nature conservation viewpoint, planting a corresponding number of trees replacing cut ones is advantageous, and the text describes how to compute this figure. But old trees should not be replanted: it should be forbidden.
Aura
|
1996
|
nr 08
26-28
Describing a number of examples on operation of forestry services in „nature reserves protected by law”, the author asks a question: Has anything at all been forbidden to foresters? He writes: “I do not try to guess the intentions of managers of nature reserves. I only state that I often see unnecessary interference in natural development of forests, which rules out sustainability of the natural ecosystem (...). Which are adverse from environmental and public standpoint”.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 6 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.