Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: warstwa wysokorozdzielcza

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Artykuł dostępny w postaci pełnego tekstu - kliknij by otworzyć plik

Program Copernicus źródłem informacji o dominującym typie drzewostanu w Polsce – ocena dokładności krajowej warstwy wysokorozdzielczej

100%

Mironczuk A., Leszczynska A., Hoscilo A.

Sylwan

2020

tom 164

nr 02

Information on the spatial distribution and variability of forests is important in monitoring of forest resources, biodiversity assessment, threat prevention, estimation of carbon content and forest management. The Pan−European High Resolution Layers (HRLs) produced as part of the European Earth Monitoring Programme – Copernicus provide detailed information on the land cover characteristics in Europe. The HRLs are produced using satellite imagery based on an interactive rule−based classification. There are the following HRL themes: imperviousness, forest, water and wetness and grasslands. The HRLs are available for the reference year 2012 and 2015, at the spatial resolution of 20 m. The forest related HRL consists of tree cover density, dominant tree type and forest type products. In this study, we performed a) the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the accuracy of the dominant leaf type (DLT) layer for the 2015 year at the national scale, and b) detailed analysis of the data quality at the forest stand level over the selected forest districts. The DLT layer was compared with the national orthophotos. The detailed analysis was carried out using Sentinel−2 images and forest inventory data obtained from the Forest Data Bank over the selected forest districts. The accuracy analysis of the national DLT layer revealed the high omission error equal to 18.8%, and lower commission error of 5.4%. The omission error is mostly related to the omitted orchards and young forest plantations, which are included in the DLT layer. The commission error of the broadleaved forest is related mostly to the small patches of coniferous forest that was misclassified as broadleaved. In general, commission errors were identified more frequently in broadleaved forest than in the coniferous forest. In many locations the patches of coniferous forest were misclassified as broadleaved forest. In general, the area of the broadleaved forest is overestimated.

Ograniczanie wyników

1 Sylwan

1 Hoscilo A.

1 Leszczynska A.

1 Mironczuk A.

1 2020

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Program Copernicus źródłem informacji o dominującym typie drzewostanu w Polsce – ocena dokładności krajowej warstwy wysokorozdzielczej