Preferencje help
Polish version English version Język
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 13

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  stanowisko lesniczego
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
1
Artykuł dostępny w postaci pełnego tekstu - kliknij by otworzyć plik
Content available

Struktura rocznego czasu pracy lesniczych

100%
Kocel J.
Sylwan
|
2007
|
tom 151
|
nr 01
3-10
2

Ocena ryzyka zawodowego na stanowisku leśniczego - krytyczna analiza metodyki i praktyki stosowanej w Lasach Państwowych

88%
Kusiak W.
Prace Komisji Nauk Rolniczych i Komisji Nauk Leśnych. Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk
|
2007
|
tom 101
3
Artykuł dostępny w postaci pełnego tekstu - kliknij by otworzyć plik
Content available

Struktura roczna i rzeczywisty czas pracy na stanowiskach leśniczego i podleśniczego

75%
Grzywinski W., Tomczak A., Jelonek T., Burzynska-Jedrzejczak G., Naskrent B.
Sylwan
|
2019
|
tom 163
|
nr 05
The aim of the study was to recognize the annual worktime structure and the actual number of working hours at the forester and deputy forester workstations in the State Forests. The research was carried out on the sample group of 462 workers in all regional directorates of the State Forests in 62 forest districts and 242 forest ranges. The study group consisted of 21 (4.5%) forest foresters from one−man forest districts (L1), 222 (48.1%) foresters and 219 deputy foresters (47.4%) from two−men forest ranges (L2 and PDL respectively). Altogether 17 groups of activities were distinguished. The workers were studied in spring, summer, autumn, and winter. Every time the research was conducted during one full week (Monday−Sunday). In case of two−men forest districts, both workers were studied simultaneously. The measurement of timework was carried out with the specially designed mobile application LP1 operating in Android system. The duration of particular activities at L1 and L2 workstations was similar. The office work constituted most of their worktime: 109.7 minutes (22.9%) for L1 and 111.5 min (23.3%) for L2. Transportation took 80.2 and 84.8 min (17.7 and 17.6%), whereas wood sale required 69.7 and 62.8 min (14.5 and 13.1%) for L1 and L2 work stations respectively. At PDL workstation passages took 84.7 min (17.6%), wood quality inspection and registration – 65.4 min (13.6%), and office work – 60 min (12.5%). The tasks comprising preparation, harvesting and sale of raw timber took 34.9% of L1 worktime, 32.5% in case of L2 and 41.6% for PDL’s worktime. All employees devoted the least of their worktime to tasks connected with fire precautions, nature conservation, and environmental education (tab. 1). The overrunning of normative worktime was recorded at all studied workstations. The mean daily worktime for PDL amounted to 8.17 hrs, whereas for L1 and L2 it was 8.47 and 8.52 hrs respectively. Except extra working hours during the working week, the overtime during the days−off was recorded too. Most of time spent on work in such situations was recorded for L1 (1.69 hrs on average per week), while the least (0.97 hrs) for L2 workstation.
4
Artykuł dostępny w postaci pełnego tekstu - kliknij by otworzyć plik
Content available

Obciążenie fizyczne na stanowiskach leśniczego i podleśniczego

63%
Grzywinski W., Jelonek T., Tomczak A.
Sylwan
|
2019
|
tom 163
|
nr 10
The paper presents the study of physiological workload at forester and deputy forester workstations in 62 forest districts located all over Poland. The research was carried out on the sample group of 185 foresters and 167 deputy foresters in the course of one week (Monday−Friday) in each season of the year. The sample group was selected based on the unit’s management difficulty degree and personal job seniority. The measurement of heart rate (HR) was used to assess workers’ physiological workload. HR telemetric measurement was carried out by the means of wireless physical activity monitors ActiGraph GT9X and Polar WearLink H7. Every heart beat was recorded (beat−to−beat). ActiLife v. 6.11 software was used for data anasysis. On the basis of mean HR the value of minute net energy expenditure (NEE) was calculated. The overall mean HR amounted to 85.0 bpm for foresters, and 93.1 bpm for deputy foresters. These values classify work of forester as light, whereas that of deputy forester in the category of moderate work. The similar level of mean HR values was recorded in particular unit’s management difficulty degree and job seniority groups, especially at forester’s position. A higher diversity of HR was noticed in seasons. The mean HR values of foresters and deputy foresters in particular unit’s management difficulty degree and job seniority classes were significantly different (p<0.05), whereas there were not statistically significant differences in HR for these factors at the same workstation. The overall mean minute NEE at forester’s position amounted to 8.2 kJ/min and 11.5 kJ/min at deputy forester’s position. The minute NEE as a derivative of HR differed slightly in unit’s management difficulty degree and job seniority groups. Higher differences of NEE were observed in particular seasons. On the basis of the minute NEE, the energy cost of workshift (8h) was calculated. At the forester workstation it amounted to 4000 kJ (955 kcal) and at deputy forester’s to 5500 kJ (1313 kcal), on average. Energy expenditure classify both workstations in the category of moderate work. At forester’s workstation the highest NEE on the workday was recorded in winter (4560 kJ) and the lowest in summer (3744 kJ), while at deputy forester’s the highest NEE was noticed in spring (5856 kJ) and the lowest in winter (4992 kJ).
5

Co leśniczy robi w lesie?

63%
Szalata J.
Echa Leśne
|
2012
|
nr 1
6

Leśniczy w niedocenianej roli, czyli wszyscy jesteśmy menedżerami

63%
Krawczyk T.
Głos Lasu
|
2014
|
nr 01
7

To nie jest dobry pomysł

63%
Kolpowski J.
Głos Lasu
|
2013
|
nr 06
8

Stres w pracy lesniczego

63%
Krajewska J., Miedzyrzecki T., Wlodarczyk T.
Przegląd Leśniczy
|
2005
|
tom 15
|
nr 05
18-20
9
Artykuł dostępny w postaci pełnego tekstu - kliknij by otworzyć plik
Content available

Ocena systemu wynagradzania i awansowania w Lasach Państwowych

51%
Kwiecien R., Kocel J.
Sylwan
|
2013
|
tom 157
|
nr 08
The article presents the results of the research on the remuneration and promotion system in the State Forests in Poland. The research was conducted using a questionnaire survey and utilises answers from 414 managers of forest districts and 105 representatives of all regional directorates of the State Forests. The respondents critically evaluated the current remuneration system, especially in the aspect of vocational promotion. negatively criticising the procedure and results of competitions for managerial positions. The paper also proposes the method for determining the amount of function allowance (according to difficulty level) for basic managerial positions. The results can be used for reviewing the employment policy in the State Forests.
10

Służbowy pamiętnik

51%
Zubkowicz R.
Las Polski
|
2005
|
nr 13-14
11

Młotkowy i chłopak do bicia

51%
Szalata J.
Głos Lasu
|
2011
|
nr 02
12

Zadania i warunki pracy lesniczego

50%
Gembarzewski A.
Biblioteczka Leśniczego
|
1994
|
tom 44
1-17
13

Czas pracy lesniczego

44%
Kocel J.
Głos Lasu
|
2006
|
nr 01
27-31
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.