Preferencje help
Polish version English version Język
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 49

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 3 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  plant protection treatment
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 3 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
1

Kontrola opryskiwaczy. Korzysc czy tylko obowiazek

100%
Laudowicz M.
Agrochemia
|
2001
|
nr 01
18-19
2

Ekonomiczno-organizacyjne problemy ochrony roślin w gospodarstwie wielkoobszarowym

100%
Gawron H., Gawron G., Golinowska M.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2009
|
tom 49
|
nr 1
3

Ryzyko zawodowe przy stosowaniu srodkow ochrony roslin w latach 1993-2002

100%
Badach H., Nazimek T.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2005
|
tom 45
|
nr 2
571-574
4

Efektywnosc pomocniczego strumienia powietrza w stosowaniu srodkow ochrony roslin

100%
Wachowiak M., Kierzek R.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2005
|
tom 45
|
nr 2
1171-1175
5

Jak chronić zboża jare?

100%
Korbas M., Horoszkiewicz-Janka J.
Farmer
|
2018
|
nr 02
6

Na plantacji burakow cukrowych. Zwalczanie chwastow jednolisciennych

100%
Miklaszewska K.
Agrochemia
|
1999
|
nr 05
10
7

Stan wiedzy i stosowanych praktyk ochrony roślin przez różne grupy producentów a wymagania integrowanej ochrony roślin – czy wystąpiły zmiany w ostatnich pięciu latach?

100%
Dabrowski Z. T., Majewski M.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2010
|
tom 50
|
nr 3
During 2001–2009 more than 900 questionnaires on farmers’ knowledge, attitudes and crop and pest management practices by various groups of farmers were collected in the selected regions of Poland. Both groups of farmers: specialized in fruit and vegetable production and owners of farms mainly producing field crops were interviewed by the M.Sc. students, originating from the selected regions and were eagerly accepted by local farmers. Some obvious differences were presented by various groups of producers of apples, sour cherries, black currants, strawberries and onions, by leaders in integrated crop and pest management in apple orchards in central Poland due to the more than 25 years involvement of the staff of Institute of Pomology and Floriculture in Skierniewice. A significant improvement in the knowledge and acceptance of integrated production (IP) and integrated pest management (IPM) principles by participants of the training courses was proved for all groups of fruit producers. The critical comments on the IP courses of participants listed in the paper should serve as a base line for the future improvement in the farmers’ training on IPM as part of National Action Program to implement IPM principles as required by the new UE Directive on sustainable pesticide management. The owners of larger agricultural farms with high external input implemented much more recommendations of integrated crop and pest management than in farms under moderate and low input. Therefore a special attention during the implementation period under the National Action Programme of the UE Directive 1107/2009 of 21st November 2009 should be given to regions characterized by majority of conventional lower input in agriculture farming. The development and activity in training farmers on Euro- and GlobalGap and IP by the newly established private extension and consulting firms may support the government institution in the specialized training of farmers and contribute to meeting condition of the UE Directive on sustainable pesticides usage in Poland.
8

Rachunek kosztów w podejmowaniu decyzji z zakresu ochrony roślin

100%
Golinowska M.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2010
|
tom 50
|
nr 4
Costs’ calculation problems in economics of agriculture were repeatedly discussed in the past. Direct and indirect costs are of an essential importance while planning and decision making. Considering decision making process related to future tasks e.g. performance of plant protection treatments, the information on expected costs and profits is required. Because of this, there is an urgent need of introducing a supplementary cost classification allowing to separate the costs relevant to decision making process. Costs of plant protection – a production activity involved in agrophages’ controlling, presents a part of economic costs. In calculating plant protection treatment costs, typical rules for economics of agriculture are used. Costs of plant protection treatments differ from other costs in agricultural production due to a different influence on yield. Plant protection treatments do not affect the increase of yield directly but prevent from losses caused by agrophages. Plant protection costs can be divided into three groups: costs of plant protection products, costs of water, costs of plant protection product application.
9

Ekonomiczne ryzyko zabiegow ochrony na przykladzie produkcji ziemniaka

100%
Rembeza J.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2004
|
tom 44
|
nr 1
314-321
10

Co decyduje o skutecznosci zabiegu?

100%
Agrochemia
|
1995
|
nr 05
14-15
11

Efektywność ekonomiczna chemicznych zabiegów zwalczania szkodników i chorób zbóż

88%
Kaniuczak Z.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2009
|
tom 49
|
nr 1
12

Aktywność dobowa chrząszczy Diabrotica virgifera Le Conte na kukurydzy cukrowej (Zea mays var. saccharata) w latach 2006–2009

88%
Beres P. K., Kaniuczak Z., Sionek R.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2010
|
tom 50
|
nr 1
The research was performed on sweet corn, Candle variety, in Terliczka near Rzeszow, in 2006–2009. In the period from the third decade of July to mid August, when the number of Diabrotica virgifera beetles was the highest, their daily activity on plants was observed at 6.00 a.m.; 9.00 a.m.; 12.00; 3.00 p.m. and 6.00 p.m. On the basis of performed research it was found that the activity of beetles D. virgifera is the highest at 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Thus, observations of the beetles chemical control, as well as observations related to that pest’s presence in crops, should be performed at that time.
13

Misecznik szklarniowy [Saissetia coffeae Walker] uciazliwy szkodnik roslin ozdobnych szklarni ogrodu botanicznego w Lublinie

88%
Golan K., Gorska-Drabik E.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2005
|
tom 45
|
nr 2
666-668
14

Uzdatnianie wody stosowanej do sporzadzania cieczy uzytkowej jako element poprawy efektywnosci zabiegow

88%
Wachowiak M., Kierzek R.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2002
|
tom 42
|
nr 2
490-493
15

Sprawny opryskiwacz - skuteczny zabieg

88%
Denisowski A.
Agrochemia
|
1996
|
nr 05
6-7
16

Efektywnosc ekonomiczna ochrony roslin w uprawie bardzo wczesnych odmian ziemniaka

88%
Pytlarz-Kozicka M., Golinowska M.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2005
|
tom 45
|
nr 1
397-403
17

Wpływ herbicydów na plon i cechy struktury plonu pszenicy ozimej

88%
Podolska G., Sulek A.
Progress in Plant Protection
|
2010
|
tom 50
|
nr 2
In 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 two field experiments were conducted. The aim of this research was to evaluate the influence of different herbicides on grain yield and yield components of winter wheat cultivars. The experiments differed by used doses of herbicides. The first factor of these experiments were herbicides differing in active ingredient: a1 – Huzar 05 WG (iodosulfuron), a2 – Puma Universal 069 WG (fenoxaprop-P-ethyl + mefenpyr-diethyl), a3 – Chwastox Extra 340 SL (MCPA). Check (control) plots were protected against weeds by hand weeding. The second factor were winter wheat cultivars: Finezja, Tonacja in 2003/2004 and Tonacja, Sukces in 2004/2005. Herbicides Puma Universal 069 WG i Chwastox Extra 340 SL used in an increased dose caused reduction in the level of grain yield of winter wheat in relation to the object with mechanical removal of weeds. The reduction in yield was the result of reducing the number of heads per unit area. Herbicides used in recommended doses had no effect on the level of yield of winter wheat.
18

Czym chronic ziemniaki jadalne przed stonka

88%
Szutkowska M.
Agrochemia
|
1999
|
nr 06
28-30
19

Zacząć od doglebowki

88%
Paradowski A.
Farmer
|
2018
|
nr 03
20

Wpływ temperatury na skuteczność oprysku

88%
Konieczny W.
Farmer
|
2018
|
nr 03
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 3 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.