Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 20

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  paleozoik
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
9
63%
Central Kazakhstan is frequently referred to as a hypothetical Paleozoic continent Kazakhstania, although its geological structure suggests that in the early Paleozoic it was either a series of island arcs or microcontinents separated by small oceanic basins, each having its own history of development. The cherty and volcanogenic-cherty deposits of the south-western Predchingiz Region and the North Balkhash Region in central Kazakhstan represent an ophiolite rock association with pelagic sediments. The Early-Middle Ordovician conodonts found in the cherty rocks are the only fossils useful for precise dating of the strata and for interpretation of the palaeobiogeographic relations. A low taxonomic diversity is typical of conodonts from these pelagic sediments. Most of them are of the Baltic type, and only some, like Paroistodus horridus and Histiodella tableheadensis, represent other, apparently more warm-water faunal elements. Deep-water conodont faunas from central Kazakhstan are coeval with the Early-Middle Ordovician conodonts from the shelf deposits of southern Kazakhstan, but the latter are taxonomically more diverse and contain warm-water forms (e.g., Juanognathus variabilis, Reutterodus andinus, Serratognathus bilobatus, and Bergstroemognathus extensus). This corroborates the idea that Kazkhstania was closer to the equator, than to the Baltic region in the Ordovician.
13
Artykuł dostępny w postaci pełnego tekstu - kliknij by otworzyć plik
Content available

Gardineria - a scleractinian living fossil

51%
The basic architecture (Bauplan) and microstructure of the skeleton of Recent Gardineria are noticeably different from those of most other modern scleractinians. The wall of the Gardineria skeleton is entirely epithecate (non-trabecular), while in the majority of modern Scleractinia the epitheca is either absent or added to the main wall which usually is of trabecular nature. These different patterns of theca formation reflect significant anatomical differences in the peripheral parts of the polyp. The Bauplan of Gardineria pattern, exceptional in the modern scleractinian fauna, was widespread among early Mesozoic corals, particularly among the Triassic protoheterastraeids. Similar skeletons also occur in some late Palaeozoic rugosans (e.g., polycoeliids). Zardinophyllum zardini, an aberrant Triassic scleractinian coral, with a supposed rugosan septal insertion, supports the hypothesis of the rugosan origin of the Scleractinia
15
51%
Turrilepadids are not uncommon in late Paleozoic shales being often associated with ostracodes, foraminifers, and minute molluscs. In North America they range from the late Missippian (Chesterian) to early Permian (Leonardian). Sclerites of the inner scleritome row are more common than outer sclerites. Some clusters have been found. Sclerite consists of two layers with the thicker, lower layer penetrated by a transverse tubular structures oriented perpendicular to the sclerite surface, which may represent canals related to the papillae on the inner surface of the sclerite. Turrilepas Lepros sp. n., T. trigoniodes sp. n., T. asketos sp. n., Clarkeolepis alloeospinosa sp. n., and Ambonlepidas petalos gen. et sp. n. are proposed.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.