Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 4

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  mitochondrial disease
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
Mitochondrial homeostasis, resulting from fusion and fission processes together with mitophagy and mitogenesis, are widely studied nowadays. This is probably because we know more and more about the role of mitochondria in metabolic diseases (diabetes, hypertension), neurodegeneration (Parkinson’s Disease, Alzheimer’s Disease), but also in broad spectrum of inherited neurological syndromes (CharcotMarie-Tooth). In our studies we aimed to examine the expression pattern of particular mitochondrial proteins, mitofusin 1 (Mfn1) and mitofusin 2 (Mfn2), in mouse tissues. We aim to verify, whether potential differences in expression of those proteins can by implicated in pathomechanism of Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2A neuromyopathy, related to mitofusion 2 gene mutations. Mitofusins are mitochondrial GTPases, implicated in fusion of outer mitochondrial membrane. In this process, mitofusins juxtapose two mitochondria by combining homo- and heterodimers at the surface of two outer mitochondrial membranes. Although there is 63% homology between mitofusins, it is proved, that they show some different functions. As Mfn1 KO present more severe aberrations in mitochondrial network formation than Mfn2 deficient cells, Mfn1 is considered to have stronger fusion activity. It is also suspected, that it is Mfn1 that links fusion of outer and inner mitochondrial membranes. Nevertheless, Mfn2, but not Mfn1, is present at endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Mfn2 tethers ER to mitochondria facilitating calcium flux and (indirectly) autophagy. Moreover, Mfn2 seems to have some regulatory effect on cell cycle, beyond its fusion activity and its lower expression seems to correlate with insulin resistance and hyper proliferation in hypertension. So, the question is, how much these two proteins can replace each other while playing so different roles? Moreover, it is suggested that CMT2A predominantly affects peripheral nerves because mutated, malfunctioned Mfn2 is insufficiently compensated by Mfn1 due to its low expression particularly in this type of tissue. To discuss this issue, we have investigated the expression of Mfn1 and Mfn2, as well as protein content, in tissues, performing Real Time PCR and Western Blot studies. Preliminary data from Western blot analysis displayed equally high relative level of both mitofusins in nervous system (dorsal root ganglia, cerebral cortex, cerebellum, spinal cord) in comparison to peripheral organs (muscle, heart, liver, kidney, skin). Moreover, Mfn1 expression seems significantly lower in dorsal root ganglia, which are well established model of peripheral nervous system. This phenomenon was not observed for other tissues, even from central nervous system. So it seems quite possible, that axonal damage of peripheral nerves in CMT2A, may be observed due to the poor compensation of dysfunctional Mfn2 by fully functional Mfn1, which is not expressed at sufficient level. The project was supported by NSC grant NN402474640
Mitochondria are multifunctional organelles, primarily involved in the fundamental biological process of respiration. The efficient functioning of mitochondria depends on the proper transport, sorting, and assembly of mitochondrial proteins that originate either from nuclear or mitochondrial genomes. Both nuclear and mitochondrial gene defects that result in pathological variants of proteins have been implicated in a variety of mitochondrial diseases. The nuclear‑encoded proteins make up the large majority of proteins involved in the formation of mitochondria, including the respiratory chain complexes. The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) in the cytosol is involved in degradation of cellular proteins and maintaining protein homeostasis. By multiple lines of evidence, we have demonstrated the contribution of the UPS to mitochondrial protein quality control. The UPS degrades a portion of mitochondrial proteins, including mislocalized proteins, in both yeast and mammalian systems. Furthermore, mislocalization of mitochondrial proteins increases the ability of the proteasome to degrade cellular proteins. Thus, the UPS constitutes an important factor that affects the mitochondrial protein import, influences the mitochondrial proteome, and links the mitochondrial status with regulation of cellular protein homeostasis. Interestingly, pathologic variants of mitochondrial proteins can be mistargeted and fully degraded by the proteasome before they reach their final destination inside mitochondria. Inhibition of proteasomal degradation by commonly used proteasome inhibitors results in rescue of proteins and their import into the mitochondria. Thus, UPS inhibition can provide a benefit to malfunctioning mitochondria and cells. We propose that targeting the UPS should be considered as a therapeutic strategy for mitochondrial diseases.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.