Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 20

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  chlodzenie woda
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
The aim of the research was to determine the quantity of nonspecific bacteria contamination, the presence of pathogenic bacteria, as well as the sensory qualities of slaughter chicken carcasses with regards to the implemented chilling system. The investigations were conducted on carcasses of broiler chickens, aged 6-8 weeks and a body weight of 1.2 – 2.5kg, that had been chilled in three technologically different systems: air, immersion and evaporative chilling. The temperature of the carcasses was taken before and after chilling, the bacterial contamination was measured (total count of aerobic bacteria, total number of coliform, psychrotropic and proteolytic bacteria), as well as a sensory analysis (appearance and odor) was conducted. The temperature of the carcasses after chilling was 4.28 °C, 6.97 °C after immersion chilling, and 4.39 °C after evaporative chilling. This data indicates that none of the mentioned systems lowered the temperature of the carcasses to that required by the regulatory limits of 4°C . According to the authors’ research the total count of aerobic bacteria in the case of carcasses chilled by air was 2.6xl04 jtk per l g, chilled by immersion, 3.9xl04 jtk, through evaporative chilling, 2.7x104 jtk /g. The bacterial contamination of carcasses chilled by water was significantly higher in comparison to both remaining chilling systems. The total number of coliforms in the case of carcasses chilled by air averaged 1.7x10 jtk/g, chilled by water 2.5x10 jtk/g, while through evaporative chilling 1.9x102 jtk/g. Only among carcasses chilled by immersion did the chilling system significantly differ the bacterial contamination of the coliform group from both remaining systems; it was higher in the case of immersion chilling. Air chilling and evaporative chilling did not differ among themselves in relation to this group of bacteria. The total number of psychrotropic bacteria in the case of carcasses chilled by air averaged 103jtk/g, chilled by immersion 1.2x104 jtk, chilled by the evaporative system 6x103 jtk/g. The chilling system significantly differed the contamination of the carcasses in the mentioned bacterial group; it was highest in the case of immersion chilling, and lowest with air chilling. The total number of proteolytic bacteria in the case of carcasses chilled by air averaged 1.8xl03 jtk/g, chilled by water 2.9xl03 jtk/g, while through evaporative chilling 3.1xl03 jtk/g. The chilling system significantly differed the contamination of the carcasses only in the case of those chilled by air from the contamination confirmed after chilling by immersion as well as evaporative chilling. The level of proteolytic bacteria in the carcasses chilled in the latter two systems was similar. Salmonella rods occurred in the muscle tissue of chickens chilled in all systems. In the investigations, Salmonella was isolated most often in carcasses from immersion chilling (27 % of the general sample), after which in those from evaporative chilling (20 %), and least often after air chilling alone (13 %). However, the chilling system did not affect the sensory qualities of the carcasses; their appearance and odor and from the perspective of sensory evaluation all the examined systems gave a high quality product. In the process of chilling poultry the highest quality chicken carcasses are gained from applying air chilling: the carcasses are relatively the best chilled and the least contaminated with nonspecific and pathogenic bacteria in comparison to those from immersion chilling and evaporative chilling. On the other hand the lowest quality product is gained from the immersion chilling of the carcasses, which are inadequately chilled and have the highest level of nonspecific and pathogenic bacteria in comparison to those from air and evaporative chilling. From the perspective of chilling, external water content and bacterial contamination, the quality of carcasses from evaporative chilling is lower in comparison to air chilling, but nonetheless higher than carcasses from immersion chilling. The authors’ research demonstrated that in none of the examined systems for chilling did the carcasses attain the prescribed regulatory temperature of 4°C, and so it would be recommended that correctional actions be taken in the examined plants in the HACCP system with regards to the chilling system, in order to attain the required end temperatures for carcasses as they have been developed in the HACCP system for the poultry industry as the so called critical limit.
The purpose of the research was to evaluate the chilling environment - the waters from the spin-chillers and the air from the chilling rooms - on the bacterial contamination of broiler chicken carcasses after slaughter. The research was conducted on two chilling systems for poultry used in Polish slaughterhouses: immersion and evaporative chilling. Forty samples of water from the spin-chillers underwent microbiological analysis as well as 20 samples of air from chilling rooms of both chilling systems. The following were determined from the above-mentioned materials: the total count of aerobic bacteria and coliforms, as well as the psychrotrophic and proteolytic groups. The presence of Salmonella was only evaluated in the water samples from the refrigerators (20 samples from each of the systems). A significant influence of the type of chilling system on the contamination of the water from the spin-chillers has been demonstrated on all the evaluated groups of bacteria. Water derived from the evaporative chilling system contained significantly more microflora (8.9 × 10³ cfu/ml) in comparison to the immersion system (7.0 × 10³ cfu/ml), which might have been caused by the manual eviscerating of the carcasses. The chilling system varied the percentage of particular groups of evaluated bacteria in the total microflora contamination in the water from the spin-chillers. Depending on the chilling system the percentage of the coliforms was 5-9% of the total count of bacteria, the percentage of psychrotrophic bacteria from 43-52%, proteolytic bacteria from 27-40%. The presence of Salmonella was confirmed in the water from the spin- -chillers of both of the systems. They were isolated more frequently in the immersion system (90% of the samples were positive) than in the evaporative chilling (50%). The most frequently isolated serotype was S. Enteritidis, the presence of which was confirmed in half of all water samples under examination. The remaining serotypes (S. Agona, S. Infantis, S. Hadar and S. Cremieu) were isolated less frequently. The analysis of the microbiological contamination of the air from the chilling rooms only demonstrated significant differences between both systems in the Coli and proteolytic groups. The count of the above-mentioned bacteria in l m³ of air was lower in a chilling room of the immersion system than in an evaporative chilling. There were no differences in the total count of bacteria and in the psychrotrophic bacteria. The total contamination in l m3 of air in the immersion system amounted to 2.9 × 10³ cfu. The count of coliforms in this system was 6.8 × 10 cfu/m³, which constituted 2.34% of the total count of bacteria, while in the evaporative chilling it was 2.7 × 10² cfu (10%). The psychrotrophic bacteria contamination constituted l.4 × 10³ (48.27%) in the immersion and l.6 × 10³ (59.25%) in the evaporative chilling. Proteolytic bacteria constituted from 10% in the immersion to 33% in the evaporative chilling of the total count of bacteria. The chilling room environment has a significant impact on the bacterial contamination of broiler chicken carcasses in the final phase of their production - primarily through the water from the spin-chillers, but also as a result the air movement.
The research objective was to assess the impact of different chilling systems on the bacterial contamination and quality characteristics of chicken carcasses during cold storage. The research was carried out on 90 carcasses of chicken broilers of 1.2-2.5 kg body weight aged 6-8 weeks, 30 from each of three plants using different chilling methods: air chilling, immersion chilling and evaporative chilling. After slaughter the carcasses were stored in a chilling room at the temperature of 0°C-4°C and relative humidity of 80% ± 2%. The total cold storage time was 6 days. The starting time (time 0) was assumed to be the 24 h after slaughter. Chosen parameters were determined on the first day of storage (time 0) as well as on its 3rd and 6th day. The parameters comprised microbiological contamination total count of aerobic bacteria, total number of coliforms, psychrotrophic and proteolytic bacteria. Additionally, a sensory assessment of the muscle tissue appearance and odour was performed (5-point scale) The bacterial contamination of carcasses after the immersion chilling was found to be significantly higher than in the other two chilling systems. Significant differences in the total count of bacteria between carcasses chilled in the immersion system and those chilled in the other two systems were observed on all days of storage. The highest contamination during the entire storage period was observed in the carcasses chilled by immersion. The contamination of air-chilled carcasses was similar to that of carcasses chilled in the evaporative system at the beginning (day 0) and towards the end of storage (day 6). The number of psychrotrophic bacteria on the 1st (day 0) and 3rd days of storage significantly depended on the chilling system. On those two days significant differences were observed between the carcasses chilled in each of the systems. On the 6th day, however, those differences were noted between the carcasses chilled in the immersion system and the ones chilled in the air and evaporative systems. In all storage periods the highest psychrotrophic contamination occurred in the immersion-chilled carcasses and the lowest in those chilled with air. The chilling method affected also the contamination of carcasses with proteolytic bacteria. Significant differences in the contamination with these bacteria occurred only between the immersion-chilled carcasses and the other two groups in all three periods of storage. Proteolytic bacteria count was the highest in the water-chilled carcasses and the lowest in those chilled with air. Adverse changes in the appearance and odour of carcasses chilled by all three methods began after 3 days of storage, but on the 6th day they were the most noticeable in the carcasses chilled by the air and evaporative methods. In terms of both these characteristics carcasses chilled in the immersion system were evaluated higher than those chilled by the other two methods, though the evaluation was negative in all three cases. The research results suggest that the chilling system has no significant impact on the durability of chicken meat during cold storage. Despite the significantly higher bacterial contamination of the carcasses chilled by immersion, sensory changes in these carcasses have not been found to occur earlier in carcasses chilled by the other methods. However, in the case of poultry meant for sale as fresh the 6-day cold storage period set by Polish Standard should be considered as too long, since the adverse sensory changes in carcasses begin already after 3 days of storage.
The aim of the reasearch was to evaluate gains and losses to producers and consumers of poultry which result from the application of diverse methods of chilling poultry carcasses. The research was carried out on 120 carcasses of slaughter chickens chilled by three different systems, i.e. air chilling, immersion chilling and evaporative chilling, 40 carcasses from each system. Weight losses or gains of the carcasses before and after chilling were initially established by the so-called plant method. The weight was measured directly after gutting and the removal of giblets and fat, but before the first washing. Each carcass was weighed to an accuracy of one gram. Then the carcasses were hanged again on the slaughter line, where they underwent the processes of washing, chilling and draining. Following the above, the carcasses were weighed for the second time. The following parameters were calculated: the average weight gain or loss of the carcass after chilling (g/carcass); the average weight gain or loss of the carcass after chilling (g/kg); the relative weight gain or loss of the carcass after chilling (%). Next, the chilling systems under examination were evaluated in terms of economic gains or losses to the poultry plant and the poultry consumer. Economic analysis involved the following indicators: the gain or loss to the plant during processing (PLN/carcass); the yearly gain or loss to the plant during chilling (PLN); the gain or loss to the plant during chilling (PLN/kg of sales); the gain or loss to the consumer resulting from chilling (PLN/kg purchased); the yearly gain or loss to the consumer; the yearly gain or loss to the social budget resulting from the choice of a specific chilling method and the yearly slaughter of chickens It was found that the carcass weight after chilling varied significantly depending on the chilling method applied. The air chilling system reduced the carcass weight on average by 2.31%. The other two chilling methods caused an increase in the carcass weight, which was greater in the immersion system: on average by 3.45%. Also the evaporative system caused the carcass weigh to grow but to a lesser extent than the immersion one: on average by 2.63%.The immersion chilling proves the most profitable to the producer. This method produces the greatest gains in the carcass weigh, consisting mainly in increased free water content in meat. The plant gains 0.20 PLN per 1 kg of meat, but the yearly gain amounts to as much as 3,449,605 PLN. The evaporative system is also profitable to the producer but the economic gain is somewhat smaller than in the immersion system. From the producer’s point of view the least desirable is chilling by air since, in comparison with the other two systems, the producer loses 2,950,899 PLN a year. By contrast, air chilling is the most favourable to the consumer. He gains 0.17 PLN per 1 kg of chicken meat purchased. Considering the yearly consumption of chicken meat, an individual consumer gains 4.50 PLN but the yearly gain from this method of chilling to entire society amounts to 203,910,000 PLN. The application of the other two chilling methods results in considerable losses to the social budget, which are especially high in the case of the immersion method.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.