Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 13

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  Brucella suis
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
Two ELISA kits for diagnosis of Brucella suis infections in pigs and hares were evaluated. The evaluation was performed by comparison of the results obtained in the ELISA with those in traditional serological methods. To evaluate the ELISA for testing pig sera, 100 samples from pigs from infected herds, 40 samples from pigs from doubtful herds and 18 672 sera from healthy pigs monitored for brucellosis were involved. As concerns the ELISA for testing hare sera, samples from 16 animals suspected of Brucella infection (in this number 12 hares revealed clinical or anatomopathological lesions characteristic of brucellosis), 8 samples from healthy hares and 1 120 samples from hares monitored for anti-Brucella antibodies were involved. The ELISA has proved to be more specific than the RBT when testing pig sera and more sensitive in testing both pig and hare sera. A high correlation between the ELISA and CFT was found. All 97 pig sera positive or doubtful in the CFT reacted positively in the ELISA, whereas only 1 serum out of 99 positive in the ELISA was negative in the CFT. Out of 53 sera hare sera positive in the ELISA, 51 revealed the anti-Brucella antibodies in the CFT (the remaining 2 were not tested). The ELISA proved to be a valuable and appropriate method for testing both pigs and hares for Brucella suis infections.
Problems in the reproduction of pigs may be the result of interaction of various factors, both infectious and non-infectious. Among the infectious agents, the greatest economic losses are caused by viral infection of pregnant gilts and sows. In the present study the most important pathogens causing reproductive disorders in pigs, including parvovirus (PPV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRSV), swine influenza virus (SIV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), enteroviruses, encephalitis virus (EMCV), Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV), classical swine fever virus (CSFV), Leptospira spp., Brucella suis and Erysipelotrix rhusiopathiae are characterized. So far, three possible ways of natural infection of the embryo or fetus are identified: via placenta, through the cervical canal, and by infection of the egg cell. The consequences of infection of pregnant females depend on the species of the virus, the gestation period, wherein there is an infection and immune status of pregnant females. The most common changes included: embryo death, resorption of embryos, mummification of fetuses, malformations, abortions, birth of dead or very weak piglets. Because of the importance of the reproduction sector for the competitive production of pigs, the monitoring of the health status of breeding stock, including compliance with all biosecurity rules and vaccination schedules, should be strictly respected by veterinarians taking care of pig breeding herds.
This paper provides an overview of the current knowledge on wild boar as a reservoir of viruses, bacteria and parasites being pathogenic also to other species of animals, and for humans, but particularly to pigs belonging to the same species, Sus scrofa, as the wild boar. Since wild boar and domestic pigs belong to the same taxonomic species they are susceptible to the same pathogens and can infect each other. Therefore free – ranging wild boar are increasingly considered to be a threat to the pig industry and the international movement of pigs and swine products. Particularly African swine fever, classical swine fever, and foot and mouth disease are those OIE-listed diseases, discussed in the paper. Additionally, domestic pigs can be infected from wild boar by PPV, PCV2, TGE and ADV. The last mentioned microorganism is causing infection and disease also in other species of animals. The wild boar is participating, by carriership, of infecting several species of animals and human by Leptospira serotypes, Brucella suis, Yersinia enterocolitica, Salmonella spp., pathogenic serovars of Escherichia coli. The same relates to bovine tuberculosis, Japanase encephalitis virus and influenza A typ viruses. Finally trichinellosis transfer from wild boar to humans with not cooked meat containing larves of Trichinella spp. is mentioned. In general remarks it is noted that to prevent pathogen introduction from wild boar to domestic animals particularly to pigs, but also other species and to humans the surveillance of the wild boar behaviour in their living conditions and environment is recommended.
Medycyna Weterynaryjna
|
2010
|
tom 66
|
nr 11
s.728-731,bibliogr.
The paper presents the most recent data and opinions concerning Brucella (B.) suis and porcine brucellosis. Included are up-to-date results concerning the classification of the genus Brucella into 9 species, among them B. suis. Five biovars of this species are mentioned. Biovars 1, 2 and 3 (particularly 1 and 3) are highly pathogenic for swine and for humans. The source of infection for swine are, besides swine, wild boar and hare. The global distribution of swine brucellosis is presented with particular reference to the European Union member countries. Since at present with the closed system swine production in the EU B. suis infection is not diagnosed, the main goal of veterinary services is the complex action against the introduction of B. suis into the national swine herds. The main risk factors are: importing of infected pigs from abroad and transmission of B. suis from the wild boar or the hare to the domestic swine. In order to exclude these possibilities, besides available directives and instructions, diagnostic laboratory investigations are of crucial importance. In the paper direct and indirect tests for the identification of B. suis infection are described and assessed with respect to their diagnostic value. Concerning direct diagnostic tests, besides traditional assays based on phenotypic properties of the microorganism, several genotypic methods and among them particularly the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are characterized. Following this, indirect diagnostic methods, being serological tests used in the diagnosis of porcine brucellosis, are discussed. Their diagnostic value is evaluated, including the possibility of false positive and false negative reactions. The Brucellin allergic skin test, as a confirmatory test of the serological results, is presented. In conclusion it is stated that the present epizootic situation concerning porcine brucellosis in the EU member countries is satisfactory. In connection with this the importance of prophylactic activity of the veterinary services against transmission of B. suis infection to domestic pigs of this region is stressed.
Brucellosis was confirmed in boars imported for breeding purposes to Poland from one of the EU countries. In serological investigations, in which the RBT, ELISA, CFT, SAT and 2-ME were used, positive reactions to brucellosis were found in 9 out of 23 animals. All the animals were slaughtered, and bacteriological examination was performed. Brucellae were isolated from the tissues of 7 boars. The characteristics of the strains isolated showed that they belonged to Brucella suis biovar 2, which is typical for Europe. The examination of animals for brucellosis at quarantine stations seems to be crucial for the protection of herds from Brucella infection.
9
59%
Brucellosis in humans is a zoonosis of greatly varied clinical image. It occurs on all inhabited continents. The course of the disease may be acute, sub-acute or chronic. The etiologic factors of brucellosis are small, aerobic Gram-negative rods of the genus Brucella, which currently contains ten species: B. abortus, B. suis, B. ovis, B. melitensis, B. canis, B. neotomae, B. pinnipedialis, B. ceti, B. microti and B. inopinata. In humans, the disease is caused mainly by: B. melitensis as the most pathogenic species, followed by B. suis, whereas B. abortus is considered as the mildest type of brucellosis. The natural reservoir of the germ and the source of infection in humans are infected domestic animals, primarily cattle, sheep, goats, as well as wild animals. Infection in humans occurs by penetration through damaged skin, conjunctiva, and more rarely via the alimentary route by the consumption of infected products. Especially exposed are: veterinarians, veterinary technicians, insemination service employees, zoo technicians, farmers working on multi-herd farms (production cooperatives), e.g. cattlemen, also private farmers, employees of slaughter houses and meat processing enterprises. A basis for diagnosing brucellosis are serologic tests which allow the detection of antibodies occurring in response to infection, performed with the use of the following methods: agglutination test, complement fixation test, Coombs test, 2-mercaptoethanol agglutination test, and Burnet’s intradermal allergy test which detects the state of hypersensitivity of the infected organism to Brucella abortus rods.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.