Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 4

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
Water vapour sorption processes on mixtures of soil and organic fertiliser Rosahumus (RH) were investigated. Mixtures were prepared with Orthic Luvisol soil formed from loamy sand and Haplic Luvisol soil formed from loess. Samples contained different doses of fertiliser in the range from 1 to 50 weight percent. Differences in water vapour sorption on Rosahumus (RH) as well as the soils were observed. The properties of soil mixtures and organic material depended on the properties of both components and on the dose of Rosahumus. However, fertiliser was a dominant factor in sorption processes of investigated mixtures. Adsorption isotherms obtained by gravimetric method belonged to the same type II, in accordance to the BET classification. Significantly higher influence on the water vapour sorption was associated with fertiliser dose and was greater for mixtures with soil formed from loess. The increase of water vapour sorption was visibly higher for mixtures below 4% of Rosahumus content. On the other hand, greater concentration of RH resulted in similar amount of water vapour sorption and for Rosahumus dose of 50% the sorption was practically the same. Similar results were found for the maximum hygroscopicity (Mh) of mixtures. Strong correlation was observed between the Mh and the amount of added organic fertiliser with determination coefficient (R2) from 0.997 to 0.998.
The heterogeneity of soil physical properties of Fluvisols, lack of large pristine areas, and different moisture regimes on non-flooded and flooded terraces impede the possibility to find a soil profile which can serve as a baseline for estimating the impact of natural or anthropogenic factors on soil evolution. The aim of this study is to compare the pore size distribution of pristine Fluvisols on flooded and non-flooded terraces using the method of the soil water retention curve, mercury intrusion porosimetry, nitrogen adsorption isotherms, and water vapour sorption. The pore size distribution of humic horizons of pristine Fluvisols on the non-flooded terrace differs from pore size distribution of Fluvisols on the flooded terrace. The peaks of textural and structural pores are higher in the humic horizons under more humid conditions. The structural characteristics of subsoil horizons depend on soil texture and evolution stage. The peaks of textural pores at about 1 mm diminish with lowering of the soil organic content. Structureless horizons are characterized by uni-modal pore size distribution. Although the content of structural pores of the subsoil horizons of Fluvisols on the non-flooded terrace is low, these pores are represented by biopores, as the coefficient of filtration is moderately high. The difference between non-flooded and flooded profiles is well expressed by the available water storage, volume and mean radius of pores, obtained by mercury intrusion porosimetry and water desorption, which are higher in the surface horizons of frequently flooded Fluvisols.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.