Ecosystem services of recreational parks in downtown Lodz (Central Poland)

• Autorzy: Dlugonski A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Ecosystem services (ES) are the benefits that society and economy derive from the environment through natural processes of ecosystems. Urban ecosystems contribute to public health and improve the quality of life of urban residents and should be taken into account when making decisions on sustainable urban development and revitalization. Recreational parks are very important components of green urban infrastructure. The aim of the study was to define the types and subtypes of ecosystem services in nine recreational parks located in the downtown zone of Łódź, Poland, using my own classification scheme (a case study). The research shows the diversification of ES depending on the park, and suggests that the potential of parks is currently not fully used. The planned revitalization of downtown Łódź could extend the range of ecosystem services.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Ecological Questions
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 29
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.113-117,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Dlugonski A.

• Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Woycickiego 1/3 St., 01-938 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Baur J.W.R., Tynon J.F., Ries P. & Rosenberger S.A., 2014, Urban Parks and Attitudes about Ecosystem Services: Does Park Use Matter? Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 32(4): 19-34.
• Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P & van den Belt M., 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.
• Czembrowski P. & Kronenberg J., 2016, Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 146/2016: 11-19. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005).
• Deptuła M., 2014, Ecosystem services of Kampinos National Park for the city of Warsaw. EUROPA XXI. Institute of Geography and Spacial Organization Polish Academy od Sciences 27: 19-31. (http://dx.doi. org/10.7163./Eu21.2014.27.2).
• Długoński A., 2017, Wpływ procesu rewitalizacji terenów zieleni na zdrowie mieszkańców miast (studium przypadku - centrum miasta Łodzi) [The impact of the revitalization of green areas on the health of urban residents (case study - city center of Łódź)], [in:] Gospodarka przestrzenna, stan obecny i wyzwania przyszłości - ujęcie interdyscyplinarne, Konferencja naukowa, Abstrakty [Land management: current status and future challenges – an interdisciplinary approach, Scientific conference, Book of abstracts], 25-26.09.2017. Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, Wydział Inżynierii Kształtowania Środowiska i Geodezji, Katedra Gospodarki Przestrzennej, Wrocław: 13-14.
• Długoński A. & Szumański M., 2016a, Atlas ekourbanistyczny zielonej infrastruktury miasta Łodzi, Tom I. Tereny zieleni, Teka 1a. Parki strefy śródmiejskiej [Eco-Urban Atlas of Green Infrastructure of Łódź City, Poland. Green Areas in Łódź City Parks in Urban Zone], Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Łódź.
• Długoński A. & Szumański M., 2016b, Use of recreational park bio-waste as locally available energy resource. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering (A) 3/2016: 265-274.
• Gminny Program Rewitalizacji Łodzi 2026+, 2016, [The Commune Revitalization Program of Łódź 2026]. Urząd Miasta Łodzi [The Office of Lodz city], Łódź.
• Haase D., Larondelle N., Andersson E., Artmann M., Borgstrom S., Breuste J., Gomez-Baggethun E., Gren A., Hamstead Z., Hansen R., Kabisch N., Kremer P., Langemeyer J., Rall E.L., McPhearson T., Pauleit S., Qureshi S., Schwarz N., Voigt A., Wurster D. & Elmqvist T., 2014, A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43(4): 413-433. [DOI: 10.1007/ s13280-014-0504-0].
• Kabisch N., Strohbach M., Haase D. & Kronenberg J., 2016, Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecological Indicators 70: 586-596. (http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029).
• Kronenberg J., & Hubacek K., 2016, From poverty trap to ecosystem service curse. Sustain Sci. 11/2016: 903- 907. [DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0370-8].
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
• Singh R. & Singh G.S., 2017, Ecosystem services: A bridging concept of ecology and economics. Ecological Questions 25: 95-101.
• Speak A.F., Mizgajski A. & Borysiak J., 2015, Allotment gardens and parks: Provision of ecosystem services with an emphasis on biodiversity. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14: 772-781. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ufug.2015.07.007).
• Szulczewska B., 2014, W pułapkach zielonej infrastruktury [Trapped green infrastructure], [in:] A. Pancewicz (ed.), Zielona infrastruktura miasta [Green infrastructure of the city]. Wyd. Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice: 9-29.
• TEEB, 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Earthscan, London Washington.
• TEEB, 2012, Poradnik TEEB dla miast: usługi ekosystemów w gospodarce miejskiej [TEEB Guide for Cities: Ecosystem Services in Urban Economy]. Fundacja Sendzimira, Kraków.
• Żylicz T., 2015, An economist looks at ecosystem services, [in:] M. Burchard-Dziubińska (ed.), Towards a green economy. From ideas to practice.Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź: 11-29.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12775/EQ.2018.009