Modele siedliskowe i analiza żywotności populacji

• Autorzy: Franz K. , Romanowski J. , Grimm V.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Habitat models and population viability analysis

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Habitat models and population viability analysis (PVA) are commonly used in conservation biology. Available programs differ in the amount of required species specific data, number of incorporated environmental factors, and assumptions about demography and population dynamics (Table I). These differences pose a potential problem for conservationists who want to apply PVA. Therefore, for successful conservation management it is important that enough effort is invested in learning the benefits and limitations of different programs. Habitat models assume unchanged habitat characteristics and ignore dynamic processes. Complex habitat models have relatively low applicability due to data unavailability. In contrast, simple models are easy to adapt to new study areas and different scales, and obtaining necessary empirical data is less costly. Programs used in population viability analysis are based on general population or metapopulation models and allow assessing the risk of extinction. Similar to the habitat models, different underlying approaches of PVA force users to choose between simplicity and realism. Model choice can be difficult especially for inexperienced users. Consequently, conservation managers planning to use habitat or PVA models to support their decisions should plan for sufficient time and resources for obtaining training. Finally, it is important to remember that modeling results can be improved by combining the elements of habitat and PVA models and by including ranking of management scenarios.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

analiza roslin; modele siedliskowe; ochrona przyrody; populacje roslin; przyroda; zywotnosc roslin

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Wiadomości Ekologiczne
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 57
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: s.97-108,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Franz K.

• Department of Ecosystem Modelling, Busgen-Institut, Georg-August-University of Gottingen, Busgenweg 4, 37077 Gottingen, Germany

autor

Romanowski J.

autor

Grimm V.

Bibliografia

• Akçakaya H.R. 2000 - Viability analyses with habitat-based metapopulation models - Popul. Ecol. 42: 45-53.
• Akçakaya H.R. 2001 - Linking population-level risk assessment with landscape and habitat models - Sci. Total Environ. 274: 283-291.
• Akçakaya H.R. 2005 - RAMAS GIS: linking spatial data with population viability analysis (version 5) - Appl. Biomath., Setauket, New York.
• Akçakaya H.R., Sjögren-Gulve P. 2000 - Population viability analyses in conservation planning: an overview - Ecol. Bull. 48: 9-21.
• Akçakaya H.R., Radeloff V.C., Mlandenoff D.J., He H.S. 2004a - Integrating landscape and metapopulation modeling approaches: viability of the sharp-tailed grouse in a dynamic landscape - Conserv. Biol. 18: 526-537.
• Akçakaya H.R., Atwood J.L., Breininger D., Collins C.T., Duncan B. 2003 - Metapopulation dynamics of the California Least Tern - J. Wildl. Manage. 67: 829-842.
• Akçakaya H.R., Burgman M.A., Kindvall O., Wood C.C., Sjögren-Gulve P., Hatfield J.S., McCarthy M.A. 2004b - Species conservation and management: case studies - Oxford University Press, New York.
• Beissinger S., McCullough D. (red.) 2002 - Population viability analysis - University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Bennett E.M., Carpenter S.R., Peterson G.D., Cumming G.S., Żurek M., Pingali P. 2003 - Why global scenarios need ecology - Front. Ecol. Environ. 1: 322-329.
• Boyce M.S. 1992 - Population viability analysis - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 481-506.
• Brainerd S., Kastdalen L., Seiler A. (red.) 2007-Habitat modelling-a tool for managing landscape - Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Sunnerstra.
• Brook В.W., O’Grady J.J., Chapman A.P., Burgman M.A., Akçakaya H.R., Frankham R. 2000 - Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology - Nature, 404: 385-387.
• Bruinderink G.G., van der Sluis T., Lammertsma D., Opdam P., Pouwels R. 2003 - Designing a coherent ecological network for large mammals in northwestern Europe - Conserv. Biol. 17: 549-557.
• Burgman M.A., Person S., Akęakaya H.R. 1993 - Risk assessment in conservation biology - Chapman & Hall, London.
• Bustamante J. 1996 - Population viability analysis of captive and released Bearded Vulture populations - Conserv. Biol. 10: 822-831.
• Cabeza M. 2003 - Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design - Ecol. Lett. 6: 665-672.
• Clark T.W., Backhouse G.N., Lacy R.C. 1991 - Report of a workshop on population viability assessment as a tool for the threatened species management and conservation - Aust. Zool. 27: 28-35.
• Crouse D.T., Crowder L.B., Caswell H. 1987 - A stage-based population model for Loggerhead Sea Turtles and implications for conservation - Ecology, 68: 1412-1423.
• Crowder L.B., Crouse D.T., Heppell S.S., Martin T.H. 1994-Predicting the impact of turtle excluder devices on Loggerhead Sea Turtle populations - Ecol. Appl. 4: 437-445.
• Dobson A.P., Bradshaw A.D., Baker A.J.M. 1997 - Hopes for the future: restoration ecology and conservation biology - Science, 277: 515-522.
• Drechsler M., Burgman M.A. 2004 - Combining population viability analysis with decision analysis - Biodiv. Conserv. 13: 115-139.
• Frank K., Lorek H., Sonnenschein M., Wissel C., Grimm V. 2003 - META-X - Software for metapopulation viability analysis (1st ed.) - Springer Verlag, Berlin.
• Franz K.W. 2011 - Metapopulation viability analysis of the Natterjack Toad (Bufo calamita): a comparative assessment of PVA software packages and management scenarios - Rozprawa doktorska, Uniwersytet Warszawski.
• Franz К.W., Romanowski J., Saavedra D. 2011-Effects of prospective landscape changes on species viability in Segre River valley, NE Spain - Landscape Urban Plann. 100: 242-250.
• Grimm V., Dorndorf N., Frey-Roos F., Wissel C., Wyszomirski T., Arnold W. 2003 - Modelling the role of social behavior in the persistence of the alpine marmot Marmota marmota - Oikos, 102: 124-136.
• Grimm V., Lorek H., Finke J., Koester F., Malachinski M., Sonnenschein M., Moilanen A., Storch I., Singer A., Wissel C., Frank K. 2004 - META-X: generic software for metapopulation viability analysis - Biodiv. Conserv. 13: 165-188.
• Hanski I. 1994 - A practical model of metapopulation dynamics - J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 151-162.
• Hanski I. 2004 - Metapopulation theory, its use and misuse - Basic Appl. Ecol. 5: 225-229.
• Kramer-Schadt S., Revilla E., Wiegand T., Breitenmoser U. 2004 - Fragmented landscapes, road mortality and patch connectivity: modelling influences on the dispersal of Eurasian lynx - J. Appl. Ecol. 4: 711-723.
• Lacy R.C. 1993 - VORTEX: A computer simulation model for population viability analysis - Wildl. Res. 20: 45-65.
• Levins R. 1969 - Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control - Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15: 237-240.
• Lindenmayer D.B., Lacy R.C. 2002 - Small mammals, habitat patches and PVA models: a field test of model predictive ability - Biol. Conserv. 103: 247-265.
• Lindenmayer D.B., Clark T.W., Lacy R.C., Thomas V.C. 1993- Population viability analysis as a tool in wildlife conservation policy: with reference to Australia - Environ. Manage. 17: 745-758.
• Lindenmayer D.B., Burgman M.A., Akęakaya H.R., Lacy R.C., Possingham H.P. 1995 - A review of the generic computer-programs Alex, Ramas/Space and Vortex for modeling the viability of wildlife metapopulations - Ecol. Modell. 82:161-174.
• Lindenmayer D.B., Possingham H.P., Lacy R.C., McCarthy M.A., Pope M.L. 2003 - How accurate are population models? Lessons from landscape-scale tests in a fragmented system - Ecol. Lett. 6: 41-47.
• Mace G.M., Lande R. 1991 - Assessing extinction threats: towards a re-evaluation of IUCN threatened species categories - Conserv. Biol. 5: 148-157.
• Matthies M., Giupponi C., Ostendorf B. 2007 - Environmental decision support systems: current issues, methods and tools - Environ. Modell. Software, 22:123-127.
• McCarthy M.A., Andelman S.J., Possingham H.P. 2003 - Reliability of relative predictions in population viability analysis - Conserv. Biol. 17: 982-989.
• Naves J., Wiegand T., Revilla E., Delibes M. 2003 - Endangered species constrained by natural and human factors: the case of brown bears in northern Spain - Conserv. Biol. 17: 1276-1289.
• Opdam P., Verboom J., Pouwels R. 2003 - Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity - Landscape Ecol. 18:113-126.
• Ovaskainen O., Hanski I. 2003 - How much does an individual habitat fragment contribute to metapopulation dynamics and persistence? - Theor. Popul. Biol. 64: 481-495.
• Pellet J., Maze G., Perrin N. 2006 - The contribution of patch topology and demographic parameters to population viability analysis predictions: the case of the European tree frog - Popul. Ecol. 48: 353-361.
• Possingham H.P., Lindenmayer D.B., Norton T.W. 1993 - A framework for the improved management of threatened species based on population viability analysis (PVA) - Рас. Conserv. Biol. 1: 39-45.
• Ragyow D., Dixon A., Kowalczyk K. 2010 - Reintroduction of the saker falcon to Bulgaria, South-East Europe (W: Global reintroduction perspectives: additional case-studies from around the globe. Red. P.S. Soorae) - IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 143-146.
• Reed J.M., Mills L.S., Dunning J.B., Menges E.S., Mckelvey K.S., Frye R., Beissinger S.R., Anstett M.-С., Miller P. 2002 - Emerging issues in population viability analysis - Conserv. Biol. 16:7-19.
• Romanowski J., Kowalczyk K., Rau K. 2008-Population viability modelling and potential threats to the beaver in the Vistula River valley, Poland - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 45: 323-328.
• Sala O.E., Chapin F.S., Armesto J.J., Berlow E., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber- Sanwald E. i in. 2000 - Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100 - Science, 287: 1770-1774.
• Soulé M.E. 1985 - What is conservation biology? - BioScience, 35: 727-734.