Zróżnicowanie liści buraka ćwikłowego a właściwości cieczy użytkowej na ich powierzchni

• Autorzy: Ratajkiewicz H. , Kierzek R. , Wachowiak M. , Skopiasz D.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Differentiation of beetroot leaves and properties of spray liquid on their surface

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

In laboratory experiments were evaluated: wetability, pH and retention on beetroot leaves (green, with amaranth tone, with powdery mildew). Static surface tension of a spray liquids was also determinated. Experiments were conducted with two fungicides (Domark 100 EC – tetraconazole and Bravo Plus 500 SC – chlorothalonil) and two adjuvants Atpolan 80 EC and Break Thrue S 240. It was concluded that properties of leaf surface can significantly change spray liquid properties of agrochemicals on leaf lamina. Wetability and pH of spray liquid on beetroot leaves differed depending on colour of a leaf lamina and on powdery mildew fungus. pH of spray liquid on leaf lamina might influence efficacy of fungicides mixed with adjuvants used to beetroot protection against Cercospora leaf spot.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

buraki cwiklowe; ciecz uzytkowa; efektywnosc dzialania; fungicydy; liscie buraczane; srodki ochrony roslin; wlasciwosci fizykochemiczne; woski kutykularne; zroznicowanie morfologiczne

EN

red beet; fungicide efficacy; fungicidal activity; fungicide; leaf; plant protection product; physicochemical property; cuticular wax; morphological differentiation

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Progress in Plant Protection
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 50
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: s.1637-1642,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Ratajkiewicz H.

• Katedra Metod Ochrony Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, ul.Zgorzelecka 4, 60-198 Poznań

autor

Kierzek R.

autor

Wachowiak M.

autor

Skopiasz D.

Bibliografia

• Baker E.A., Hunt G.M. 1981. Developmental changes in leaf epicuticular waxes in relation to foliar penetration. New Phytol. 88: 731–747.
• Gaskin R.E., Murray R.J., Krishna H., Carpenter A. 2000. Effect of adjuvants on the retention of insecticide spray on cucumber and pea foliage. N. Z. Plant Protect. 53: 355–359.
• Grayson B.T., Price P.J., Walter D. 1996. Effect of volume rate of application on the glasshouse performance of crop protection agent/adjuvant combinations. Pestic. Sci. 48: 205–217.
• Holloway P.J., Butler Ellis M.C., Webb D.A., Western N.M., Tuck C.R., Hayes A.L., Miller P.C.H. 2000. Effects of some agricultural tank-mix adjuvants on the deposition efficacy of aqueous sprays on foliage. Crop Protect. 19: 27–37.
• Nalewaja J.D., Devilliers B., Matysiak R. 1996. Surfactant and salt affect glyphosate retention and absorption. Weed Res. 36: 241–247.
• Narkiewicz-Jodko J., Tomczak J., Nowosielski O. 1990. Effect of plant protection foliar fertilizer – Mixt-1 in control of Colorado potato beetle. 23. Int. Hort. Congress Firenze 17.08–01.09.1990. Abstracts, 1, p. 522.
• Ratajkiewicz H., Wachowiak M., Kierzek R. 2008. Rola parametrów opryskiwania i adiuwantów w skuteczności działania fungicydów przeciwko chwościkowi buraka (Cercospora beticola). Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr Roślin 48 (3): 1101–1105.
• Stevens P.J.G., Gaskin R.E., Hong S., Zabkiewicz J.A. 1991. Contributions of stomatal infiltration and cuticular penetration to enhancements of foliar uptake by surfactants. Pestic. Sci. 33: 371–382.
• Woźnica Z. 2008. Herbologia. Podstawy Biologii, Ekologii i Zwalczania Chwastów. PWRiL, Poznań, 430 ss.