The never-ending problem of Miocene beaver taxonomy

• Autorzy: Casanovas-Vilar I. , Alba D.M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The finds of Miocene beavers are not rare at all. Nevertheless, in most localities these rodents are only represented by a few dental elements, so that large collections are only occasionally available to researchers. Hence, the description of sufficiently large samples, such as the recently published description of Steneofiber depereti from Hambach 6C (NW Germany, MN5) by Mörs and Stefen (2010), deserves the greatest attention. After a comprehensive description and comparison of the material, these authors conclude that previous citations of the beaver Chalicomys jaegeri from the MN4 to MN6 (early to middle Miocene) are misidentifications of the genus Steneofiber. Following Stefen (2009), these authors further question the validity of all the known Chalicomys species from the later middle Miocene (MN7+8). We agree with these authors that the occurrence of C. jaegeri in the middle Miocene is doubtful, but we disagree with their arguments for the synonymization of several species. Here we address this point and discuss the taxonomic criteria for distinguishing both genera, further reviewing the taxonomy of the genus Chalicomys at the species level.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Chalicomys jaegeri; Miocene; Steneofiber depereti; beaver; dental element; distinction; locality; measurement; paleontology; rodent; small size; species stand; taxonomy; tooth

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 56
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.217-220,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Casanovas-Vilar I.

• Institut Catala de Paleontologia (ICP), Modul ICP, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain

autor

Alba D.M.

Bibliografia

• Agustí, J., Moyà−Solà, S., and Gibert, L. 1984. Mammal distribution dynamics in the eastern margin of the Iberian Peninsula during the Miocene. Paleobiologie Continentale 14: 33–46.
• Aldana Carrasco, E. 1992. Los Castoridae (Rodentia, Mammalia) del Neógeno de Cataluña (España). Treballs del Museu de Geologia de Barcelona 2: 99–141.
• Bataller, J.R. 1924. Contribució a l’estudi de nous mamífers fossils de Catalunya. Arxius de l’Institut de Ciències 12: 36–41.
• Bataller, J.R. 1938. Els ratadors fossils de Catalunya. 64 pp. Impremta de la Casa d’Assistència President Macià, Barcelona.
• Casanovas−Vilar, I., Alba, D.M., Almécija, S., Robles, J.M., Galindo, J., and Moyà−Solà, S. 2008. Taxonomy and paleobiology of the genus Chalicomys Kaup, 1832 (Rodentia, Castoridae), with the description of a new species from Abocador de Can Mata (Vallès−Penedès Basin, Catalonia, Spain). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28: 851–862. [CrossRef]
• Crusafont Pairó, M., Villalta, J.F. de, and Bataller, J.R. 1948. Los castores fósiles de España. Boletín del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España 61: 321–423.
• Franzen, J.L. and Storch, G. 1975. Die unterpliozäne (turolische) Wirbeltierfauna von Dorn−Dürkheim, Rheinhessen (SW−Deutschland). 1. Entdeckung, Geologie, Mammalia: Carnivora, Proboscidea, Rodentia. Grabungsergebnisse 1972–1973. Senckenbergiana lethaea 56: 233–303.
• Ginsburg, L. 1971. Sur l'évolution des Steneofiber (Mammalia, Rodentia) en France. Comptes Rendus Académie des Sciences, Paris, Série D 273: 2159–2161.
• Hugueney, M. 1999. Family Castoridae.In: G.E. Rössner and K. Heissig (eds.), The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe, 281–300. Verlag Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.
• Hünerman, K.A. 1966. Der Bau des Biber−Prämolaren und seine Verwendbarkeit für die Systematic der Castoridae (Rodentia, Mammalia). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palaöntologie−Abhandlungen 125: 227–234.
• Kaup, J. 1832. Beschreibung dreyer Gattungen urweltlicher Nager des Zoologischen Museums zu Darmstadt, welche von den jetzt lebenden Genera verschieden sind. Isis von Oken 9: 992–996.
• Korth, W.W. 2001. Comments on the systematics and classification of the beavers (Castoridae, Rodentia). Journal of Mammalian Evolution 8: 279–296. [CrossRef]
• Kotsakis, T. 1989. Quelques observations sur les Castoridae du Turolien et du Ruscinien. Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 28: 271–276.
• Lartet, E. 1851. Notice sur la colline de Sansan, suivie d’une récapitulation des diverses espèces d’animaux vertébrés fossiles, trouvés soit à Sansan, soint dans d’autres gisements du terrain tertiare miocène dans le Bassin Sous−Pyrénéen. 41 pp. J. A. Portes, Auch.
• Mörs, T. and Stefen, C. 2010. The castorid Steneofiberfrom NW Germany and its implications for the taxonomy of Miocene beavers. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 55: 189–198. [CrossRef]
• Rekovets, L., Kopij, G., and Nowakowski, D. 2009. Taxonomic diversity and spatio−temporal distribution of late Cenozoic beavers (Castoridae, Rodentia) of Ukraine. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 52A: 95–105.
• Stefen, C. 2009. The European Tertiary beaver Chalicomys jaegeri (Rodentia, Castoridae) revisited. Kaupia 16: 161–175.
• Stehlin, H.G. and Helbing, H. 1925. Catalogue des Ossements de Mammifères Tertiaires de la Collection Bourgeois à l’Ecole de Pont−Levoy (Loir et Cher, France). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle et d’Anthropologie du Loir−et−Cher 18: 77–277.
• Van de Weerd, A. 1976. Rodent faunas of the Mio−Pliocene continental sediments of the Teruel−Alfambra region, Spain. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletins (4): 1–185.
• Xu, X. 1994. Evolution of Chinese Castoridae. In: C.K. Li, Y. Tomida, and T. Setoguchi (eds.), Rodent and Lagomorph families of Asian origin and Diversification. Natural Science Museum Monographs 8: 77–97.