Systemy oceny kompetencji rozwojowej oocytów oraz zarodków ssaków oparte na technologii mikrofluidycznej typu Lab-on-Chip

• Autorzy: Kempisty B. , Walczak R. , Antosik P. , Szczepanska P. , Wozna M. , Bukowska D. , Zaorska K. , Dziuban J. , Jaskowski J.M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Systems for evaluating the developmental competence of mammalian oocytes and embryos based on the Lab-on-Chip microfluidic technology

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

This review presents basic criteria for evaluating the developmental competence of oocytes and embryos, and contains a detailed description of the microfluidic-technology-based Lab-on-Chip. The developmental competence of oocytes is acquired through a complex process associated with oocyte growth and maturation, the storage of large amounts of mRNA and proteins, and with the formation of proper cell morphology. The full maturation of oocytes is required for successful monospermic fertilization and embryonic preimplantation development. The morphology of the gamete is one of the most important factors influencing the developmental competence of the cell. There are several indicators for the assessment of oocyte morphology, most of them including the color and granularity of the cytoplasm. Intensive research is under way to develop and introduce new non-invasive methods of oocyte and embryo quality assessment as a major factor in the improvement of assisted reproductive techniques. The Lab-on-Chip technology, as an independent micro-cytometric device, is a combination of reproductive biology techniques and micro-optic electronics. In the future, Lab-on-Chip systems may be used as an important diagnostic instrument for evaluating the quality of mammalian oocytes and embryos.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

ssaki; rozrod zwierzat; oocyty; zarodki; jakosc; kompetencja rozwojowa; ocena; systemy oceny; technologia Lab-on-Chip; demonstrator APOZAR

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 67
• Numer: 01
• Opis fizyczny: s.25-28,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Kempisty B.

• Katedra i Zakład Histologii i Embriologii, Wydział Lekarski II, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, ul.Święcickiego 6, 60-781 Poznań

autor

Walczak R.

autor

Antosik P.

autor

Szczepanska P.

autor

Wozna M.

autor

Bukowska D.

autor

Zaorska K.

autor

Dziuban J.

autor

Jaskowski J.M.

Bibliografia

• 1.Aebersold R., Mann M.: Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422, 198-207.
• 2.Antosik P., Kempisty B., Bukowska D., Jackowska M., Włodarczyk R., Budna J., Brüssow K. P., Lianeri M., Jagodziński P. P., Jaśkowski J. M.: Follicular size is associated with the levels of transcripts and proteins of selected molecules responsible for the fertilization ability of oocytes of puberal gilts. J. Reprod. Dev. 2009, 55, 588-593.
• 3.Antosik P., Kempisty B., Jackowska M., Bukowska D., Lianeri M., Brüssow K. P., Wozna M., Jaskowski J. M.: The morphology of porcine oocytes is associated with zona pellucida glycoprotein 3 and integrin beta 2protein levels. Vet. Med. 2010, 55, 154-162.
• 4.Bachvarova R. F.: A maternal tail of poly(A): the long and short of it. Cell 1992, 96, 895-897.
• 5.Balaban B., Urman B.: Effect of oocyte morphology on embryo development and implantation. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2006, 12, 608-615.
• 6.Bhojwani M., Rudolph E., Kanitz W., Zuehlke H., Schneider F., Tomek W.: Molecular analysis of maturation processes by protein and phosphoprotein profiling during in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes: a proteomic approach. Cloning Stem Cells 2006, 8, 259-274.
• 7.Borini A., Lagalla C., Cattoli M., Sereni E., Sciajno R., Flamigni C., Coticchio G.: Predictive factors for embryo implantation potential. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2005, 10, 653-668.
• 8.Copp A. J.: Death before birth: clues from gene knockouts and mutations. Trends Genet. 1995, 11, 87-93.
• 9.Coticchio G., Sereni E., Serrao L., Mazzone S., Iadarola I., Borini A.: What criteria for the definition of oocyte quality? Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2004, 1034, 132-144.
• 10.Duranthon V., Renard J. P.: The developmental competence of mammalian oocytes: a convenient but biologically fuzzy concept. Theriogenology 2001, 55, 1277-1289.
• 11.First N. L., Leibfried-Rutledge M. L., Sirard M. A.: Cytoplasmic control of oocyte maturation and species differences in the development of maturational competence. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1988, 267, 1-46.
• 12.Gajda B.: Factors and methods of pig oocyte and embryo quality improvement and their application in reproductive biotechnology. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 9, 97-112.
• 13.Goovaerts I. G., Leroy J. L., Jorssen E. P., Bols P. E.: Noninvasive bovine oocyte quality assessment: possibilities of a single oocyte culture. Theriogenology 2010, 11 (Epub ahead of print).
• 14.Görg A., Weiss W., Dunn M. J.: Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics 2004, 4, 3665-3685.
• 15.Gosden R. G.: Oogenesis as a foundation for embryogenesis. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2002, 186, 149-153.
• 16.Hoshi H.: In vitro production of bovine embryos and their application for embryo transfer. Theriogenology 2003, 59, 675-685.
• 17.Hytell P., Xa K. P., Smith S., Greve T.: Ultrastructure of in vitro oocyte maturation in cattle. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1986, 78, 615-625.
• 18.Jackowska M., Kempisty B., Antosik P., Bukowska D., Budna J., Lianeri M., Rosińska E., Woźna M., Jagodziński P. P., Jaśkowski J. M.: The morphology of porcine oocytes is associated with zona pellucida glycoprotein transcript contents. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 9, 79-85.
• 19.Jaśkowski J. M., Kempisty B., Woźna M., Walczak R., Szczepańska P., Dziuban J., Antosik P.: Wybrane metody oceny kompetencji rozwojowej oraz selekcji oocytów i zarodków bydlęcych. Medycyna Wet. 2010 [w druku].
• 20.Kastrop P. M., Bevers M. M., Destrée O. H., Kruip T. A.: Protein synthesis and phosphorylation patterns of bovine oocytes maturing in vivo. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1991, 29, 271-275.
• 21.Katz-Jaffe M. G., Gardner D. K.: Embryology in the era of proteomics. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 125-130.
• 22.Kempisty B., Antosik P., Bukowska D., Jackowska M., Lianeri M., Jaśkowski J. M., Jagodziński P. P.: Analysis of selected transcript levels in porcine spermatozoa, oocytes, zygotes and two-cell stage embryos. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2008, 20, 513-518.
• 23.Kempisty B., Antosik P., Bukowska D., Jackowska M., Lianeri M., Jaśkowski J. M., Jagodziński P. P.: Assessment of zona pellucida glycoprotein and integrin transcript contents in porcine oocytes. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 9, 71-78.
• 24.Kim M. J., Oh H. J., Park J. E., Hong S. G., Kang J. T., Koo O. J., Kang S. K., Jang G., Lee B. C.: Influence of oocyte donor and embryo recipient conditions on cloning efficiency in dogs. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 473-478.
• 25.Krisher R. L.: The effect of oocyte quality on development. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 14-23.
• 26.Lasiene K., Vitkus A., Valanciûte A., Lasys V.: Morphological criteria of oocyte quality. Medicina (Kaunas) 2009, 45, 509-515.
• 27.Memili E., First N. L.: Zygotic and embryonic gene expression in cow: a review of timing and mechanisms of early gene expression as compared with other species. Zygote 2000, 8, 87-96.
• 28.Misirlioglu M., Page G. P., Sagirkaya H., Kaya A., Parrish J. J., First N. L., Memili E.: Dynamics of global transcriptome in bovine matured oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 18905-18910.
• 29.Mtango N. R., Potireddy S., Latham K. E.: Oocyte quality and maternal control of development. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 268, 223-290.
• 30.Murayama Y., Constantinou C. E., Omata S.: Micro-mechanical sensing for the characterization of the elastic properties of the ovum via uniaxial measurement. J. Biomech. 2004, 37, 67-72.
• 31.Patrizio P., Fragouli E., Bianchi V., Borini A., Wells D.: Molecular methods for selection of the ideal oocyte. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2007, 15, 346-353.
• 32.Rodríguez-Alvarez L., Cox J., Tovar H., Einspanier R., Castro F. O.: Changes in the expression of pluripotency-associated genes during preimplantation and peri-implantation stages in bovine cloned and in vitro produced embryos. Zygote 2010, 30, 1-11.
• 33.Rodriguez-Zas S. L., Schellander K., Lewin H. A.: Biological interpretations of transcriptomic profiles in mammalian oocytes and embryos. Reproduction 2008, 135, 129-139.
• 34.Sirard M. A.: Resumption of meiosis: mechanism involved in meiotic progression and its relation with developmental competence. Theriogenology 2001, 55, 1241-1254.
• 35.Sirard M. A., Richard F., Blondin P., Robert C.: Contribution of the oocyte to embryo quality. Theriogenology 2006, 65, 126-136.
• 36.Smith G. D., Takayama S.: Gamete and embryo isolation and culture with microfluidics. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 190-195.
• 37.Soom A. van, Mateusen B., Leroy J., De Kruif A.: Assessment of mammalian embryo quality: what can we learn from embryo morphology? Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2003, 7, 664-670.
• 38.Szczepanska P., Walczak R., Dziuban J., Jackowska M., Kempisty B., Jaskowski M. J., Bargiel S.: Lab-on-chip quality classification of porcine/bovine oocytes. Proc. Chemistry 2009, 1, 341-344.
• 39.Szczepasńka P., Walczak R., Dziuban J., Kempisty B., Jackowska M., Antosik P., Jaśkowski J., Bargiel S.: Ocena jakościowa komórek rozrodczych zwierząt hodowlanych z wykorzystaniem mikrocytometru typu lab-chip. Elektronika 2010, 6, 93-96.
• 40.Telford N. A., Watson A. J., Schultz G. A.: Transition from maternal to embryonic control in early mammalian development: a comparison of several species. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1990, 26, 90-100.
• 41.Ubaldi F., Rienzi L.: Morphological selection of gametes. Placenta. 2008, 29, 115-120.
• 42.Urbanski J. P., Johnson M. T., Craig D. D., Potter D. L., Gardner D. K., Thorsen T.: Noninvasive metabolic profiling using microfluidics for analysis of single preimplantation embryos. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 6500-6507.
• 43.Watson A. J.: Oocyte cytoplasmic maturation: a key mediator of oocyte and embryo developmental competence. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, E1-3.
• 44.Wrenzycki C., Herrmann D., Niemann H.: Messenger RNA in oocytes and embryos in relation to embryo viability. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 77-83.
• 45.Zeggari R., Wacogne B., Pieralli C., Roux C., Gharbi T.: A full micro-fluidic system for single oocyte manipulation including an optical sensor for cell maturity estimation and fertilization indication. Sensors and Actuators 2007, 125, 664-671.
• 46.Ziober B. L., Mauk M. G., Falls E. M., Chen Z., Ziober A. F., Bau H. H.: Lab-on-a-chip for oral cancer screening and diagnosis. Head Neck 2008, 30, 111-121.