Wpływ fluorkowania kontaktowego materiałów szkłojonomerowych na właściwości hamowania przez nie wzrostu bakterii płytki nazębnej

• Autorzy: Pluciennik-Stronias M. , Sakowska D. , Krzeminski Z. , Piatowska D.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Influence of topical fluoridation of glass ionomer cements on inhibitory activity on cariogenic bacteria

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Oceniano wpływ materiału szkłojonomerowego na wzrost bakterii próchni- cotwórczych płytki nazębnej po dodatkowym wcieraniu w ten materiał preparatu fluorkowego. Oceny dokonano po sześciu miesiącach od wypełnienia cementem szkłojonomerowym ubytków przyszyjkowych. Stwierdzono, że dodatkowe wcieranie fluorku w powierzchnię szkłojonomeru nie przywraca mu właściwości hamowania wzrostu bakterii płytki nazębnej.

EN

Glass ionomer cements are important options in restorative and preventive dentistry due to their adhesion to the tooth surface and fluoride release, which can decrease the risk of recurrent caries. The aim of this study was to define, in vivo, the influence of the topical use of fluoride gel on dental plaque bacteria growing on the glass ionomer cement. Fifteen patients were included into this study. Thirty five class V restorations from the glass ionomer cement ( Ketac Molar Aplicap, ESPE Germany) were placed in the patient's one half of the lower jaw. The sound enamel of other side of the lower jaw was treated as a control. After 6 month 72 old dental plaque was collected from the surfaces of restorations and the surfaces of the sound enamel. Total amount of 30 dental plaque samples were investigated according to the previously described method ( 17). In dental plaque samples the amount of Streptococcus mutans was calculated at the Department of Microbiology, Medical University of Łódź. Next the topical application of fluoride gel (Fluormex) was performed on the surfaces of glass ionomer (Ketac Molar) fillings and the sound enamel. The patients were asked not to clean the teeth for 72h. After this time the dental plaque was again collected from the surfaces of restorations and sound enamel. Statistical analysis of collected data was accomplished and showed no statistically significant differences in the amount of Streptococcus mutans both on Ketac Molar and the enamel before and after the topical use of fluoride gel. It was concluded that the topical fluoridation of glass ionomer cement did not affect Streptococcus mutans growing in dental plaque.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

bakterie; fluor; fluorkowanie; hamowanie wzrostu; materialy szklojonomerowe; plytka nazebna; prochnica zebow; wzrost bakterii

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Doświadczalna i Mikrobiologia
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 62
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: s.369-374,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Pluciennik-Stronias M.

• Zakład Stomatologii Zachowawczej, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Łodzi, Lodz

autor

Sakowska D.

autor

Krzeminski Z.

autor

Piatowska D.

Bibliografia

• 1. Arends J, Christoffersen J. The nature of early caries lesions in enamel. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 2-11.
• 2. Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodriques Jr AL, Curry JA. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1993; 27: 280-4.
• 3. Duque C, Negrini TdeC, Hebling J, Spolidopio DM. Inhibitory activity of glass-ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 636-40.
• 4. Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S. Fluoride and mutans Streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Caries Res 1991; 25: 133-6.
• 5. Fucio SB, Carvalho FG, Sobrinho LC i inni. The influence of30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials-an in vitro study. J Dent 2008; 36: 833-9.
• 6. Gama-Teixeira A, Simionato MR, Elian SN i inni. Streptococcus mutans-included secondary caries adjacent to glass ionomer cement, composite resin and amalgam restorations in vivo. Braz Oral Res 2007;21:368-74.
• 7. Hara AT, Turssi CP, Ando M i inni. Influence of fluoride-releasin restorative material on root dentine secondary caries in situ. Caries Res 2006; 40: 435-9.
• 8. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Suljak JP, Koch G. Remineralization of natural carious lesions with a glass-ionomer cement. Swed Dent J 1997; 21: 11-7.
• 9. Kolourides T. Sumary of session II: Fluoride and the caries process. Caries Res. 1990; 69 (special issue): 558.
• 10. Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE. In vivo cariostatic effect of resin modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam on dentine. Caries Res 1997; 31: 384-9.
• 11. Larmas EL, Makinen KK, Scheinin A. Turku sugar studies. VIII. Principal microbiological findings. Acta Odont Scand 1975; 70:173-89.
• 12. Mc Lean JW. The clinical use of glass ionomer cements. Dent Clin North Am. 1992;36:693-711.
• 13. Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S i inni. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4457-63.
• 14. Pereira P N, Inokoshi S, Tagami I. In vitro secondary caries inhibition around fluoride releasing materials. J Dent 1998; 26: 505-10.
• 15. Pedrini D, Gaetti-Jardim Jr E, MoriGG. Effect of application of fluoride on the superficial roughness of vitremer glas ionomer cement and microbial adhesion to this material. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2001; 15: 70-6.
• 16. Płuciennik M, Sakowska D., Krzemiński Z, Piątowska D. Wpływ materiałów uwalniających fluor na skład płytki nazębnej. Med Dośw Mikrobiol 2008; 60:131-8.
• 17. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Teglers PT. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1387-96.
• 18. Schaeken MJ, van der Hoeven JS, Franken HC. Comparative recovery of Streptococcus mutans on five isolation media, including a new simple selective medium. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 906-8.
• 19. Seppä L, Korhonen A, Nuutinen A. Inhibitory effect on S. mutans by fluoride-treated convencional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103: 182-5.
• 20. Seppä L, Forss H, Ögaard В. The effect of fluoride application on fluoride release and the antibacterial action of glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 1310-4.
• 21. Svanberg M. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: three-year clinical study. Caries Res 1992; 26: 315-8.
• 22. Svanberg M, Mjor L, Orstavik D. Mutans Streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite and glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 861-4.