Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 55 | 3 |
Tytuł artykułu

Evaluation of corneal and conjunctival epithelium with the use of impression cytology in mixed-breed dogs diagnosed with keratoconjunctivits sicca

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The study was conducted on 18 mixed-breed dogs, aged 2.5 to 10 years. All patients were diagnosed with immune- mediated keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) during an ophthalmological examination. A total of 33 corneas and conjunctivae were affected by the disease. Based on the results of Schirmer's test (STT), the patients were divided into three equal groups. In group I, the STT score was within the range of 0-5 mm, in group II - 6-10 mm, and in group III - 11-14 mm. Impression cytology of the bulbar conjunctiva and cornea were performed with the use of round millipore filters applied over the examined surfaces. One disk was used to sample material from the superior and inferior temporal quadrants of the cornea and the adjacent bulbar conjunctiva, the second disk was applied on palpebral conjunctiva surface of the palpebra superior. The disks were subsequently stained using the PAS method. The cytological analysis of corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells was performed according to the 4 grade Nelson- Adams index. In the impression cytology preparations from patients with advanced stages of KCS, a significant progress of epithelial cell metaplasia in the cornea and conjunctiva was observed - classified as grade 3. It was observed also that the degree of corneal and conjunctival cell metaplasia advancement in KCS patients increased with the decrease of STT values. The presence of goblet cells was not observed in either bulbar or palpebral conjunctiva, regardless of KCS advancement. Impression cytology is a simple and non-invasive method of examining the conjunctival and corneal epithelium and allows close monitoring of the disease process in dogs diagnosed with KCS.
Opis fizyczny
  • Department and Clinic of Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
  • 1. Adams G.G.W., Lilly P.N., Kirkness C.M.: Monitoring ocular disease by impression cytology. Eye 1988, 2, 506- 516.
  • 2. Aragona P., Papa V., Micali A., Santocono M., Milazzo G.: Long term treatment with sodium hyaluronate- containing artificial tears reduces ocular surface damage in patients with dry eye. Br J Opth 2002, 86, 181-184.
  • 3. Balicki I.: Research on diagnostic and treatment of chronic superficial keratitis in dogs. Postdoctoral dissertation, Agricultural University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland, 2005, 204, pp. 32-34.
  • 4. Bauer G.A., Spiess B.M., Lutz H.: Exfoliative cytology of conjunctiva and cornea in domestic animals: a comparison of four collecting techniques. Vet Comp Ophthalmol 1996,6, 181-186.
  • 5. Egbert P.R., Lauber S., Maurice D.M.: A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol 1977, 84, 798- 801.
  • 6. Giuliano E.A., Moore C.P.: Diseases and surgery of the lacrimal secretory system. In: Veterinary Ophthalmology, edited by K.N. Gelatt, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, USA, 2007, pp. 637-644.
  • 7. Jégou J.P., Liotet S.: The benefit of conjunctival scraping cytology in the biological diagnosis of conjunctivitis in dogs and cats. Europ J Compan Animal Practic 1993, 3, 83-97.
  • 8. Maggs D.J.: Basic diagnostic techniqes. In: Slatter's Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology, edited by D.J. Maggs, P.E. Miller, R.Ofri, Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, USA, 2008, p.84.
  • 9. Marek J., Podhorska M.: Evaluation of changes in the cells of conjunctival epithelium in dry eye syndrome by impression cytology. Klinika Oczna 1995, 97, 176-181.
  • 10. Maskin S.L., Heitman K.F., Cawton A.W., Yee R.W.: Diagnostic impression cytology for external eye disease. Cornea 1989, 8, 270-273.
  • 11. Miller P.E.: Lacrimal system. In: Slatter's Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology, edited by D.J. Maggs, P.E. Miller, R. Ofri, Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, USA, 2008, p. 167.
  • 12. Mooer C.P., Collier L.L.: Ocular surface disease associated with loss conjunctival goblet cells in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1990, 26, 458-466.
  • 13. Nelson J.D., Havener V.R., Cameron J.D.: Cellulose acetate impressions of the ocular surface. Dry eye states. Arch Ophthalmol 1983, 101, 1869-1872.
  • 14. Nelson J.D.: Conjunctival goblet cell densities in ocular surface disease. Arch Ophthalmol 1984, 102, 1049-1051.
  • 15. Nelson J.D.: Impression cytology. Cornea 1988, 7, 71-81.
  • 16. Oziębło-Kupczyk M., Średzińska-Kita D., Kita K., Mrugacz M:. Impression cytology in patients with dry eye syndrome and various rheumatic diseases. Klinika Oczna 2006, 108, 10-12.
  • 17. Reddy M., Reddy P.R., Reddy P.C.: Conjunctival impression cytology in dry eye states. Indian J Opth 1991, 39, 22-24.
  • 18. Singh M., Singh G., Dwevedi S., Singh K., Kumar D., Tiwari A., Aggarwal M.: Conjunctival impression cytology in xerophthalmia among rural children. Indian J Opth 1997, 45, 25-29.
  • 19. Thatcher R.W., Darougar S., Jones B.R.: Conjunctival impression cytology. Arch Opthhalmol 1977, 95, 678- 681.
  • 20. Tseng S.C.G., Hirst L.W., Maumenee A.E., Kenyon K.R., Sun T.T., Greek W.R.: Possible mechanisms for the loss of goblet cells in mucin-deficient disorders. Ophthalmology 1984, 91, 545-552.
  • 21. Wróblewska E.: Evaluation of bulbar conjunctiva and tear secretion after long-term antiglaucoma drugs administration. Doctoral Thesis, Medical University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland, 1997, pp. 15-53.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.