New data on the anatomy and relationships of the Paleocene crocodylian Akanthosuchus langstoni

• Autorzy: Hill R.V. , Lucas S.G.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The phylogenetic relationships of the Paleocene crocodylian Akanthosuchus langstoni are assessed using published data matrices and morphological data from the holotype and referred specimens. Cladistic analyses indicate that Akanthosuchus is unequivocally nested within Alligatoroidea. Weak support from a majority rule consensus tree indicates that Akanthosuchus may be more closely allied with alligatorines than with caimanines, but in the strict consensus tree these relationships remain ambiguous. There is no evidence from phylogenetic analyses to support the hypothesis that Akanthosuchus represents the postcrania of the Paleocene crocodylians Navajosuchus or Ceratosuchus. Growth marks observed in histological sections of osteoderms of the holotype of Akanthosuchus langstoni indicate that it was at least eight years old at the time of death. Although the individual may not have been fully mature at the time of death, lineage dwarfism cannot be ruled out as a possible reason for its relatively small size.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Akanthosuchus langstoni; Alligatoroidea; Crocodylia; holotype; Paleocene; anatomy; dwarfism; paleontology; phylogenetic relationship; phylogenetic analysis

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: 51
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.455-464,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Hill R.V.

• Department of Anatomy, New York College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA

autor

Lucas S.G.

Bibliografia

• Berg, D.E. 1966. Die Krokodile, insbesondereAsiatosuchus und aff. Sebecus?, aus dem Eozän von Messel bei Darmstadt/Hessen. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung 52: 1–105.
• Brazaitis, P. 1973. The identification of living crocodilians. Zoologica 59: 59–88.
• Brochu, C.A. 1996. Closure of neurocentral sutures during crocodilian ontogeny: implications for maturity assessment in fossil archosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16: 49–62.
• Brochu, C.A. 1997a. Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. Systematic Biology 46: 479–522.
• Brochu, C.A. 1997b. A review of “Leidyosuchus”(Crocodyliformes, Eusuchia) from the Cretaceous through Eocene of North America. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 17: 679–697.
• Brochu, C.A. 1999. Phylogenetics, taxonomy, and historical biogeography of Alligatoroidea. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19 (Supplement to 2): 9–99.
• Brochu, C.A. 2004. Alligatorine phylogeny and the status of Allognathosuchus Mook, 1921. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 857–873.
• Buffrénil V.de, Farlow, J.O., and Ricqlès, A.de. 1986. Growth and function of Stegosaurus plates: evidence from bone histology. Paleobiology 12: 459–473.
• CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora). 1997. CITES Identification Guide—Crocodilians. 148 pp. Minister of Supply and Services, Canada.
• Colbert, E.H. and Mook, C.C. 1951. The ancestral crocodilian Protosuchus. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 97: 143–182.
• Curry, K.A. 1999. Ontogenetic histology of Apatosaurus (Dinosauria: Sauropoda): new insights on growth rates and longevity. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 654–665.
• Daudin, F.M. 1802. Histoire naturelle générale et particulière des reptiles, vol 2. 432 pp. F. Dufart, Paris.
• Erickson, B.R. 1982. Wannaganosuchus, a new alligator from the Paleocene of North America. Journal of Paleontology 56: 492–506.
• Erickson, G.M. and Brochu, C.A. 1999. How the ‘terror crocodile’ grew so big. Nature 398: 205–206.
• Gilmore, C.W. 1942. A new fossil reptile from the Upper Cretaceous of Utah. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 93: 109–114.
• Goloboff, P. 1994. NONA: A tree Searching Program. Program and Documentation. American Museum of Natural History, New York.
• Heckert, A.B. and Lucas, S.G. 1999. A new aetosaur (Reptilia: Archosauria) from the Upper Triassic of Texas and the phylogeny of aetosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 50–68.
• Heckert, A.B. and Lucas, S.G. 2003. Clarifying aetosaur phylogeny requires more fossils, not more trees—Reply to “Intraorganismal homology, character construction, and the phylogeny of aetosaurian archosaurs (Reptilia, Diapsida)”. Systematic Biology 52: 253–255.
• Hill, R.V. 2003 Reconstructing amniote phylogeny using morphology of the skeleton, integument, and osteoderms. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23 (Supplement to 3): 70A.
• Hill, R.V. 2004. Integration of Morphological Data Sets for Phylogenetic Analysis of Amniota: the Importance of Integumentary Characters and Increased Taxonomic Sampling. Ph.D. Dissertation, 331 pp. UMI Microforms No. 3161086, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
• Hill, R.V. 2005. Integration of morphological data sets for phylogenetic analysis of Amniota: the importance of integumentary characters and increased taxonomic sampling. Systematic Biology 54: 530–547.
• Langston, W. Jr. 1973. The crocodilian skull in historical perspective. In: T.S. Parsons (ed.), Biology of the Reptilia, 263–283. Academic Press, London.
• Lucas, S.G. 1992. Cretaceous–Eocene crocodilians from the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook 43: 257–264.
• Lucas, S.G. and Estep, J.W. 2000. Osteology of Allognathosuchus mooki Simpson, a Paleocene crocodilian from the San Juan Basin, New Mexico, and the monophyly of Allognathosuchus. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and science Bulletin 16: 155–168.
• Magnusson, W.E. and Lima, A.P. 1991. The ecology of a cryptic predator, Paleosuchus trigonatus, in a tropical rainforest. Journal of Herpetology 25: 41–48.
• Magnusson, W.E. and Sanaiotti, T.M. 1995. Growth of Caiman crocodilus crocodilus in Central Amazonia, Brazil. Copeia 1995: 498–501.
• Main, R.P., Ricqlès, A. de., Horner, J.R., and Padian, K. 2005. The evolution and function of thyreophoran dinosaur scutes: implications for plate function in stegosaurs. Paleobiology 31: 291–314.
• Mook, C.C. 1941. A new crocodilian, Hassiacosuchus kayi, from the Bridger Eocene beds of Wyoming. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 28: 207–220.
• Nixon, K.C. and Wheeler, Q.D. 1992. Extinction and the origin of species. In: M.J. Novacek and Q.D. Wheeler, (eds.), Extinction and Phylogeny, 119–143. Columbia University Press, New York.
• Norell, M.A. and Clark, J.M. 1990. A reanalysis of Bernissartia fagesii, with comments on its phylogenetic position and its bearing on the origin and diagnosis of the Eusuchia. Bulletin de L’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 60: 115–128.
• O’Neill, F.M., Lucas, S.G., and Kues, B.S. 1981. Akanthosuchus langstoni, a new crocodilian from the Nacimiento Formation (Paleocene, Torrejonian) of New Mexico. Journal of Paleontology 55: 340–352.
• Ross, F.D. and Mayer, G.C. 1983. On the dorsal armor of the Crocodilia. In: A.G.J. Rhodin and K. Miyata (eds.), Advances in Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology (Essays in Honor of Ernest E. Williams), 305–331. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
• Scheyer, T.M. and P.M. Sander. 2004. Histology of ankylosaur osteoderms: implications for systematics and function. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 874–893.
• Sullivan, R.M., Lucas, S.G., and Tsentas, C. 1988. Navajosuchus is Allognathosuchus. Journal of Herpetology 22: 121–125.
• Swofford, D.L. 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
• Tucker, A.D. 1997. Validation of skeletochronology to determine age of freshwater crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni). Marine and Freshwater Research 48: 343–351.