PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 80 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Syntaxonomy and ecology of forest vegetation in the Stiavnicke vrchy Mts (Central Slovakia)

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Vegetation of deciduous forests in the Štiavnické vrchy Mts (Central Slovakia) was studied using the standard Zürich-Montpellier approach. The numerical classification and ordination technique were applied to determine the main forest vegetation types and to find the responsible environmental drivers related to their distribution patterns, respectively. The data set including 198 relevés collected by authors in 1997-2009 and 185 relevés excerpted from literature was used to analysis. Numerical classification resulted in delimitation of fourteen vegetation types representing eleven associations with two variants and two communities within the Quercetea roboripetraeae and Querco-Fagetea classes. The major environmental gradients in variation of forest species composition were associated with moisture and nutrient content following the average Ellenberg indicator values. Along the moisture gradient, vegetation types were ordered from subxerophilous oak forests turn mesophilous mixed oak-hornbeam, beech and ravine forests to hygrophilous riparian alder forest. The results confirmed important role of soil nutrients and moisture by determination of forest vegetation in subcontinental part of Central Europe. Special attention was given to the discussion of floristical characteristics, site conditions and syntaxonomy.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

80

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.115-127,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Faculty of Education, Catholic University, Hrabovska cesta 1, SK-034 01 Ruzomberok, Slovak Republic
autor

Bibliografia

  • AUDE E., LAWESSON J.E. 1998. Vegetation in Danish beech forests: the importance of soil, microclimate and management factors, evaluated by variation partitioning. Plant Ecol. 134: 53-65.
  • BALKOVIČ J. 2002. Forest vegetation in the north-western part of the Štiavnické vrchy Mts. Phytopedon 2002(1): 17-32.
  • BARKMAN J.J., DOING H., SEGAL S. 1964. Kritische Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zur quantitativen Vegetationsanalyse. Acta Bot. Neerl. 13: 394-419.
  • BOLTE A., CZAJKOWSKI T., KOMPA T. 2007. The north-eastern distribution range of European beech – a review. Forestry 80: 413-429.
  • BORHIDI A. 2003. Magyarország növénytársulásai. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. (in Hungary)
  • BOTTA-DUKÁT Z., CHYTRÝ M., HÁJKOVÁ P., HAVLOVÁ M. 2005. Vegetation of lowland wet meadows along a climatic continentality gradient in Central Europe. Preslia 77: 89-111.
  • BOUBLÍK K., PETŘÍK P., SÁDLO J., HÉDL R., WILLNER W., ČERNÝ T., KOLBEK J. 2007. Calcicolous beech forests and related vegetation in the Czech Republic: a comparison of formalized classifications. Preslia 79: 141-161.
  • BRAUN-BLANQUET J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Ed. 3. Springer,Wien. CHYTRÝ M., TICHÝ L., HOLT J., BOTTA-DUKÁT Z. 2002. Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 79-90.
  • CIRIAKOVÁ A., HEGEDÜŠOVÁ-KUČEROVÁ K. 2003. The forest communities of Northwest part of the Štiavnické vrchy Mountains and their ecological characteristics. Ekológia 22: 8-15.
  • DAMBRINE E., DUPOUEY J.L., LAÜT L., HUMBERT L., THINON M., BEAUFILS T., RICHARD H. 2007. Present forest biodiversity patterns in France related to former Roman agriculture. Ecology 88: 1430-1439.
  • DOUDA J. 2008. Formalized classification of the vegetation of alder carr and floodplain forests in the Czech Republic. Preslia 80: 199-224.
  • ELLENBERG H. 1982. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
  • ELLENBERG H., WEBER H.E., DÜLL R., WIRTH V., WERNER W., PAULISSEN D. 1992. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr. Geobot. 18: 1-258.
  • HÄRDTLE W. 2004. Bodensaure Eichen- und Eichenmischwälder Europas. Tuexenia 24: 57-72.
  • HÄRDTLEW., VON OHEIMB G.,WESTPHAL C. 2005. Relationships between the vegetation and soil conditions in beech and beech-oak forests of northern Germany. Plant Ecol. 177: 113-124.
  • HEGEDÜŠOVÁ K. 2007. Centrálna databáza fytocenologických zápisov (CDF) na Slovensku. Bull. Slov. Bot. Spoločn. 29: 124-129. (in Slovak with English summary)
  • HENNEKENS S.M., SCHAMINÉE J.H.J. 2001. TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 589-591.
  • HILITZER A. 1932. Bory na Horšovotýnsku. Čas. Nár. Mus. 106: 1-12. (in Czech)
  • HLAVAČEK A. 1985. Flóra CHKO Štiavnické vrchy. ÚŠOP, Bratislava. (in Slovak)
  • JAROLÍMEK I., ŠIBÍK J., HEGEDÜŠOVÁ K., JANIŠOVÁ M., KLIMENT J., KUČERA P., MÁJEKOVÁ J., MICHÁLKOVÁ D., SADLOŇOVÁ J., ŠIBÍKOVÁ I., ŠKODOVÁ I., UHLÍŘOVÁ J., UJHÁZY K., UJHÁZYOVÁ M., VALACHOVIČ M., ZALIBEROVÁ M. 2008. A list of vegetationunits of Slovakia. In: I. Jarolímek, J. Šibík (eds), Diagnostic,constant and dominant species of the higher vegetation unitsof Slovakia. Veda, Bratislava, pp. 295-329.
  • KÁRPÁTI V., KÁRPÁTI I., JURKO A. 1963. Bachbegleitende Erlenauen im eukarpatischen und pannonischen Mittelgebirge. Biologia 18(2): 97-120.
  • KLIKA J. 1936. Das Klimax-Gebiet der Buchenwälder in der Westkarpathen. Beih. Bot. Cbl. 55: 117-157.
  • KLIMENT J. 1999. Komentovaný prehľad vyšších rastlín flóry Slovenska, uvádzaných v literatúre ako endemické taxóny.Bull. Slov. Bot. Spoločn. 21, Suppl. 4: 1-434. (in Slovak with English summary)
  • KNOLLOVÁ I., CHYTRÝ M. 2004. Oak-hornbeam forests of the Czech Republic: geographical and ecological approaches to vegetation classification. Preslia 76: 291-311.
  • KOLB A., DIEKMANN M. 2004. Effects of environment, habitat configuration and forest continuity on the distribution of forest plant species. J. Veg. Sci. 15: 199-208.
  • LEUSCHNER C., MEIER I.C, HERTEL D. 2006. On the niche breadth of Fagus sylvatica: soil nutrient status in 50 Central European beech stands on a broad range of bedrock types. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 355-368.
  • LEUSCHNER C., LENDZION J. 2009. Air humidity, soil moisture and soil chemistry as determinants of the herb layer composition in European beech forests. J. Veg. Sci. 20: 288-298.
  • MARHOLD K., HINDÁK F. 1998. Checklist of non-vascular and vascular plants of Slovakia. Veda, Bratislava.
  • MATUSZKIEWICZ W. 2000. The systematic position of thermophilous beechwoods (Cephalanthero-Fagenion) in Poland. Fragmenta Flor. Geobot. 45(1-2): 393-412.
  • MATUSZKIEWICZ W. 2007. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa. (in Polish)
  • MATUSZKIEWICZ W., MATUSZKIEWICZ A. 1973. Przegląd fitosocjologiczny zbiorowisk leśnych Polski. Cz. 1. Lasy bukowe. Phytocoenosis 2: 143-202. (in Polish)
  • MCCUNE B., MEFFORD M.J. 1999. PC-ORD, Multivariete analysis of ecological data, version 4.0. MjM Software Design, Oregon.
  • MIADOK D. 1978. Bachbegleitende Erlenbrüche im nordwestlichen Teil des Gemerské Rudohorie-Gebirges. Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot. 26: 107-115.
  • MICHALKO J., BERTA J., MAGIC D. (eds). 1986. Geobotanická mapa ČSSR. Slovenská socialistická republika. Textová časť. Veda, Bratislava. (in Slovak with German summary)
  • MIKYŠKA R. 1929. Skalka v horách Štiavnických (Studie geobotanická). Věstn. Král. České Společn. Nauk. Tř. II, 1928: 1- 23. (in Czech with French summary)
  • MIKYŠKA R. 1933. Vegetationsanalyse nebst einigen ökologischen Beobachtungen auf dem Berge Holík im Štiavnické středohoří (Schemnitzer Mittelgebirge). Beih. Bot. Cbl. 51: 354- -373.
  • MIKYŠKA R. 1939. Studie über die natürlichen Waldbestände im Slowakischen Mittelgebirge (Slovenské stredohorie). Ein Beitrag zur Soziologie der Karpatenwälder. Beih. Bot. Cbl. 59: 169-244.
  • MORAVEC J. 1985. Chorological and ecological phenomena in the differentiation and distribution of the Fagion associations in Bohemia and Moravia (Czechoslovakia). Vegetatio 59: 39- -45.
  • MORAVEC J. 1998. Přehled vegetace České republiky, Svazek 1. Acidofilní doubravy. Academia, Praha. (in Czech with English summary) MORAVEC J. 1999. Differentiation of the Fagion and Luzulo-Fagion associations in the Czech Republic. Ann. Bot. 55(1997): 97-104.
  • MORAVEC J., HUSOVÁ M., CHYTRÝ M., NEUHÄUSLOVÁ Z. 2000. Přehled vegetace České republiky, Svazek 2. Hygrofilní, mezofilní a xerofilní opadavé lesy. Academia, Praha. (in Czech with English summary)
  • NEUHÄUSL R. 1977. Comparative ecological study of European oak-hornbeam forests. Natur. Canad. 104: 109-117.
  • NEUHÄUSL R., NEUHÄUSLOVÁ-NOVOTNÁ Z. 1964. Vegetationsverhältnisse am Südrand des Schemnitzer Gebirges. Biol. Práce 10(4): 1-80
  • NEUHÄUSLOVÁ-NOVOTNÁ Z. 1964. Zur Charakteristik der Carpinion-Gesellschaften in der Tschechoslowakei. Preslia 36: 38-54.
  • ONYSHCHENKO V.A. 2010. A revised classification of Ukrainian forests of the order Fagetalia sylvaticae. Tuexenia 30: 31-45.
  • PALLAS J. 1996. Beitrag zur Syntaxonomie und Nomenklatur der bodensauren Eichenmischwälder in Mitteleuropa. Phytocoenologia 26: 1-79.
  • POTT R. 1992. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands. Eugen Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart. ROLEČEK J. 2005. Vegetation types of dry-mesic oak forests in Slovakia. Preslia 77: 241-261.
  • ROO-ZIELINSKA E., SOLON J. 1997. Effect of geographical location on species composition, vegetation structure, diversity and phytoindicative characteristics in pine forests. Environ. Pollut. 98: 347-360.
  • SLEZÁK M., KUKLA J. 2009. Forest vegetation of the northern part of the Štiavnické vrchy Mts. Folia Oecol. 36(1): 39-49.
  • SLEZÁK M., PETRÁŠOVÁ A. 2010. Oak forest vegetation in the northern part of the Štiavnické vrchy Mts (Central Slovakia). Hacquetia 9: 221-238.
  • ŠAMONIL P., VRŠKA T. 2008. Long-term vegetation dynamics in the Šumava Mts natural spruce-fir-beech forests. Plant Ecol. 196: 197-214.
  • ŠOMŠÁK L. 2000. Alnion glutinosae Malcuit 1929 na Slovensku (Západné Karpaty). Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot. 40: 81-102. (in Slovak with English summary)
  • TER BRAAK C.J.F., ŠMILAUER P. 2002. CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s guide. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca–New York.
  • TICHÝ L. 2002. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 451-453.
  • TICHÝ L., CHYTRÝ M. 2006. Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size. J. Veg. Sci. 17: 809-818.
  • TOWPASZ K., STACHURSKA-SWAKOŃ A. 2008. Alder-ash and willow communities and their diversity in the Pogórze Strzyzowskie Foothills (Western Carpathians). Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 77: 327-338.
  • UJHÁZY K., HRIVNÁK R., BELANOVÁ E., BENČAŤOVÁ B. 2004. The beech forest vegetation of the Cerová vrchovina Mts (Southern Slovakia). Hacquetia 3: 61-73.
  • UJHÁZYOVÁ M. 2007. Syntaxonómia bukových lesov na vápencoch bradlového pásma. Technická univerzita, Zvolen. (in Slovak with English summary)
  • VON OHEIMB G., HÄRDTLE W. 2009. Selection harvest in temperate deciduous forests: impact on herb layer richness and composition. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 271-287.
  • WILLNER W. 2002. Syntaxonomische Revision der südmitteleuropäischen Buchenwälder. Phytocoenologia 32: 337-453.
  • WILLNER W., GRABHERR G. 2007. Die Wälder und Gebüsche Österreichs. Ein Bestimmungswerk mit Tabellen. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. Heidelberg.
  • WILLNER W., DI PIETRO R., BERGMEIER E. 2009. Phytogeographical evidence for post-glacial dispersal limitation of European beech forest species. Ecography 32: 1011-1018.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.dl-catalog-54d8e57c-8f17-4c06-85be-fd6cbdf12d5c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.