Detection of bovine genital campylobacteriosis in population of Polish heifers

• Autorzy: Szymanska-Czerwinska M. , Niemczuk K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of campylobacteriosis in population of Polish heifers. An additional objective was to compare two independent methods used in diagnosis of the disease: culture and PCR. The 1,600 vaginal swabs from heifer origin from different farms of Poland were investigated using both methods. The results showed that the percentage of positive samples was 0.75% when the culture method was used, while the application of PCR method has shown 1.81% positive results.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

detection; bovine genital campylobacteriosis; campylobacteriosis; animal population; Polish population; Poland; heifer; Campylobacter foetus ssp.venerealis; laboratory diagnosis; animal disease; Campylobacter foetus ssp.foetus; Campylobacter foetus; polymerase chain reaction; cattle

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Puławy
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.377-379,fig,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Szymanska-Czerwinska M.

• Department of Cattle and Sheep Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Niemczuk K.

Bibliografia

• 1. Atabay H.I., Corny J.E.: The isolation and prevalence of campylobacters from dairy cattle using a variety of methods. J App Microbiol 1998, 84, 733-740.
• 2. Bawa E.K., Adekeye J.O., Oyedipe E.O., Omoh J.U.: Prevalence of bovine campx lobacteriosis in indigenous cattle of three states in Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod 1991, 23, 157-160.
• 3. Eaglesome M.D., Garcia M.M.: Microbial agents associated with bovine genital tract infections and semen. I. Brucella abortus, Leptospira, Campylobacter foetus and Trichomonas foetus. Vet Bull 1992, 62, 743-775.
• 4. Eaglesome M. D., Sampath M.I., Garcia M.M.: A detection assay for Campylobacter foetus in bovine semen by restriction analysis of PCR amplified DNA. Vet Res Commun 1995, 19, 253-263.
• 5. Hum S., Quinn K., Brunner J., On S.L.W: Evaluation of a PCR assay for identification and differentiation of Campylobacter foetus subspecies. Aust Vet J 1997, 75, 827-831.
• 6. Hum S.: Vibriosis of cattle In: NSW Department of Primary Industries, http://www.agric.nsw.gov.au/reader/ cattlehealth/a297.htm, 2005.
• 7. McMillen L., Fordyce G., Doogan V.J., Lew A.E.: Comparison of culture and novel 5' Taq nuclease assay for direction of Campylobacter foetus subsp. venerealis in clinical specimens from Cattle. J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44, 938-945.
• 8. Moolhuijzen P.M., Lew-Tabor A.E., Wlodek B.M., Aguero F.G., Comerci D.J., Ugaalde R.A., Sanchez D.O., Appels R., Bellgard M.: Genomic analysis of Campylobacter foetus subspecies: indentification of candidate virulence determinants and diagnostic assay targets. BMC Microbiol 2009, 86, 1471-2180.
• 9. Rosławski K.: Bovine genital campylobacteriosis. Edited by PWRiL, Poznań, Poland, 1981, pp. 7-46.
• 10. Seyyal A.K., Turan N.: Use of ELISA, IFA, and avidin- biotin staining for the diagnosis of bovine genital campylobacteriosis. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2000, 24, 113- 121.
• 11. Schultze F., Bagon A., Müller W., Hotzel H.: Identification of Campylobacter foetus subspecies, by phenothypic differentiation and PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44, 291-204.
• 12. Thompson A.S., Bleser M.: Pathogenesis of Campylobacter foetus infections. In: Campylobacter. Edited by Nachamkin I., Washington, 2000, pp. 320-322.
• 13. Van Bergen M.A.P., Simons G., Van der Graff-van Bloois L., Putten J.P.M., Rombout J., Wesley I., Wagenar J.A.: Amplified fragment length polymorphism based identification of genetic markers and novel PCR assay for differentiation of Campylobacter foetus subspecies. J Med Microbiol 2005, 54, 1217-1224.
• 14. Willoughby K., Netton P.F., Quirie M., Maley M.A., Foster G., Toszeghy M., Newell D.G.: A multiplex polymerase chain reaction to detect and differentiation of Campylobacter foetus subspecies foetus and Campylobacter foetus-species venerealis: use on UK isolates of C. foetus and other Campylobacter spp. J App Microbiol 2005, 99, 758-766.