PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2010 | 26 |

Tytuł artykułu

Furniture clusters in Europe – some issues

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
This paper presents issues connected with operation of furniture clusters in EU with a special emphasis put on establishment of clusters in Poland. The paper also discusses potential created when enterprises form a cluster. Some case studies are given to provide a comparison between clusters operating in various European countries.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

26

Opis fizyczny

p.122-126,ref.

Twórcy

  • Wood Technology Institute, Winiarska 1, 60-654 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Acharya S. & Clayton Z. & Eriksson Giwa S. & Malinger E. & Moura A. 2009. The North Carolina Furniture Cluster – The Microeconomics of Competitiveness. Harvard University. MA. www.isc.hbs.edu/pdf/Student.../ USA_Furniture_2009.pdf.
  • 2. Brege S. & Milewski J. & Berglund M. 2001. Storskalighet och småföretagande - en studie av strategiska grupper inom svensk möbelindustri VINNOVA Rapport, VR. 2001:41.
  • 3. Buehlmann U. & Schuler A. 2009. The U.S. household furniture industry: Status and opportunities. For.prod.J. vol 59 (9) p.20- 28 .
  • 4. Buehlmann U. & Wiedenbeck J. &Schuler A. 2003. State of North American Hardwood Industry - How to Compete Globally. Presentation in (NHLA) Atlanta, GA, September 18, 2003.
  • 5. Drew S.A.W. 1997. From knowledge to action: The impact of benchmarking on organizational performance. Long Range Planning. 30(3):427-441.
  • 6. Grushecky S. U., Buehlmann A., Schuler B., Luppold E. Cesa. 2006. Decline in the U.S. Furniture Industry: a Case Study of the Impacts to the Hardwood Lumber Supply Chain. Wood and Fiber Science 38(2):365-376.
  • 7. Högberg F. 2007. Industriell dynamik och innovation i svensk möbelindustri -En studie av kluster, det lokalas betydelse och konkurrenskraft.. Arbetsrap Nr. 641Kulturgeogr ins.. Uppsala Universitet.
  • 8. Isaksen A. 1996. Regional Clusters and Competitiveness: the Norwegian Case. STEP report R 16. Oslo.
  • 9. Maskell P. & Lorenzen M. 2003. The Cluster as Market Organization. DRUID Working Pap No 03-14.
  • 10. Maskell P. 1996. Localised low-tech learning in the furniture industry. DRUID Working Pap. No. 96-11
  • 11. Ollonqvist P. & Nord T. & Pirc A. & Ukrainski K. & Takala-Schreib V. & Teder M. & Strykowsky W. & Viitala A. 2010. Networks and Local Milieus as Furniture Industry Innovation Platform. COST E 51 Book II
  • 12. Schuler A. & Buehlmann U. 2002. Identifying Future Ciompetitive Business Strategies for the US. Residential Wood Furniture Industry Benchmarking tand paradigm Shifts. General Technical Report NE-304. .Northeastern Research Station. Forest Service. US. Dep. of Agr. http://www.littlecolorado.net/swsfp/Irland%20Presentions/gtrne304.pdf
  • 13. Schuler A. & Lawser S. 2007. The U.S. Furniture Industry: Yesterday and Toda Will There Be a Tomorrow? Wood Digest. 6/2007 http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/11996
  • 14. UEA (European Furniture Manufacturers Federation), Furniture in Europe, 2006.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.dl-catalog-31b76edf-6f0c-429b-aea5-2dd3830b7c52
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.