PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2014 | 49 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Characteristics and diversity of Rhizoctonia spp. population in soil of selected forest bare-root nurseries in Poland

Autorzy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Fourty three Rhizoctonia isolates obtained from four forest nurseries situated in the Wielkopolska region (central-western Poland) has been proved as multinucleate (anamorph – R. solani). They represented four anastomosis groups (AG): AG1-IC, AG-5, AG4-HG2 and AG2-1. Three AGs were found in Jarocin nursery (AG-5, AG4-HG2 and AG2-1), two in Łopuchówko (AG-5 and AG4-HG2) and one in Konstantynowo (AG1-IC) and Pniewy (AG-5). All isolates were highly pathogenic to Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings and pose a large damping-off threat to the seedlings in the nurseries with single AG and in those where more AGs exists.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

49

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.279-290,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Forest Pathology, Faculty of Forestry, Poznan University of LIfe Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71c, 60-625 Poznan, Poland
autor
  • Department of Forest Pathology, Faculty of Forestry, Poznan University of LIfe Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71c, 60-625 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Report on the state of forests in Poland [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2014 July 29]; Available from: http:// http://www.lasy.gov.pl
  • 2. Sierota Z. Choroby infekcyjne w szkółkach leśnych. In: Sierota Z, Małecka M, editors. Profilaktyka i terapia w szkółkach leśnych zagrożonych przez choroby infekcyjne. Materiały konferencji naukowo-technicznej 24–25 III 1998 Warszawa-Sękocin. Warszawa: IBL; 1998. p. 5–9.
  • 3. Mańka K. Fitopatologia leśna. Warszawa: PWRiL; 2005.
  • 4. Hietala A, Mehli L, Nagy N, Kvaalen H, La Porta N. Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 as a causative agent of cotyledon rot on European beech (Fagus sylvatica). For Pathol. 2005;35:397–410. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2005.00420.x
  • 5. Gierczak M. Badania nad zgorzelą siewek sosny i modrzewia. Pr Kom Nauk Rol Kom Nauk Leśnych. 1963;15(2):131–145.
  • 6. Stępniewska-Jarosz S, Mańka M, Asiegbu F. Studies on anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani isolates causing disease in two forest nurseries in Poland. For Pathol. 2006;36(2):97–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2006.00439.x
  • 7. Duda B, Orlikowski L. Rhizoctonia solani on corniferous seedlings in forest nurseries. J Plant Prot Res. 2004;44(3):175–180.
  • 8. Bełka M, Mańka M, Szewczyk W. Rhizoctonia spp. – damping-off pathogens of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings in Nowy Dwór forest nursery versus soil fungi community in 2006. Phytopathologia. 2011;62:25–30.
  • 9. Cubeta MA, Vilgalys R, Gonzales D. Molecular approaches for examining species concepts in Rhizoctonia. In: International symposium on Rhizoctonia, ISR’95, Leeuwenhorst Congres Centrum, Noordwijkerhout, Holland, 27–30 June 1995; 1995.
  • 10. Hietala AM, Sen R. Rhizoctonia associated with forest trees. In: Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S, Dijst G, editors. Rhizoctonia species: taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology, pathology and disease control. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 351–358.
  • 11. Chase A. Characterization of Rhizoctonia species isolated from ornamentals in Florida. Plant Dis. 1991;75:234–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PD-75-0234
  • 12. Vidhyasekaran P, Ruby Ponmalar T, Samiyappan R, Velazhahan R, Vimala R, Ramanathan A, et al. Host-specific toxin production by Rhizoctonia solani, the rice sheath blight pathogen. Phytopathology. 1997;87:1258–1263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.12.1258
  • 13. Masuka A. Binucleate Rhizoctonia on tobacco in Zimbabwe. Plant Dis. 1998;82:263. http://dx.doi. org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.2.263A
  • 14. Poromarto S, Nelson B, Freeman T. Association of binucleate Rhizoctonia with soybean and mechanism of biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology. 1998;88:1056–1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.10.1056
  • 15. Martin F. Rhizoctonia spp. recovered from strawberry roots in central coastal California. Phytopathology. 2000;90:345–353. http:/dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.4.345
  • 16. Blazier S, Conway K. Characterization of Rhizoctonia solani isolates associated with patch diseases on turfgrass. Proc Okla Acad Sci. 2004;84:41–51.
  • 17. Tomaso-Peterson M, Trevathan LE. Rhizoctonia solani AG-13 isolated from corn in Mississippi. Plant Dis. 2004;88:908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.8.908A
  • 18. Jabaji-Hare S, Neate SM. Nonpathogenic binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. and benzothiadiazole protect cotton seedlings against Rhizoctonia damping-off and Alternaria leaf spot in cotton. Phytopathology. 2005;95(9):1030–1036. http:/dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-95-1030
  • 19. Khan FU, Nelson BD. Greenhouse evaluation of binucleate Rhizoctonia for control of R. solani in soybean. Plant Dis. 2005;89(4):373–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-0373
  • 20. González García V, Portal Onco M, Rubio Susan V. Review. Biology and systematics of the form genus Rhizoctonia. Span J Agric Res. 2006;4(1):55–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar%2F2006041-178
  • 21. Schillinger WF. Reduction of Rhizoctonia bare patch in wheat with barley rotations. Plant Dis. 2006;90:302–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-0302
  • 22. Tomaso-Peterson M. Characterization of Rhizoctonia-like fungi isolated from agronomic crops and turfgrasses in Mississippi. Plant Dis. 2007;91:260–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-3-0260
  • 23. Mohammadi Baitamar R, Salari M, Zafari D. Anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani from potato and survey of somatic compatible groups by morphological characters and RAPD marker. Iran J Plant Pathol. 2010;45:87–89.
  • 24. Ogoshi A. Grouping of Rhizoctonia solani Kuehn with hyphal anastomosis. Annual Phytopathological Society of Japan. 1972;38:117–122.
  • 25. Ogoshi A. Grouping of Rhizoctonia solani Kuehn and their perfect stages. Rev Plant Prot Res Japan. 1975;8:98–103.
  • 26. Oniki M, Ogoshi A, Araki T, Ikeda H. Ceratobasidium species isolated from heath-like symptoms of rice plants. Mycol Soc Japan. 1981;26.
  • 27. Oniki M, Ogoshi A, Araki T, Sakai R, Tanaka S. The perfect state of Rhizoctonia oryzae and Rhizoctonia zeae, and the anastomosis groups of Waitea circinata. Transactions of the Mycological Society of Japan. 1985;26:189–198.
  • 28. Parmeter JR Jr, Whitney HS. Taxonomy and nomenclature of the imperfect state. In: Parmeter JR Jr, editor. Biology and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1970. p. 7–19.
  • 29. Yokoyama K, Ogoshi A. Hyphal fusion-like reaction between Rhizoctonia solani and binucleate Rhizoctonia. In: Harvey IC, editor. Proceedings of the 5th congress of plant pathology, August 20–27 1998. Kyoto; 1988. p. 199.
  • 30. Sneh B, Burpee L, Ogoshi A. Identification of Rhizoctonia species. Saint Paul, MN: APS Press; 1998.
  • 31. Matsumoto T. Studies in the physiology of the fungi. XII. Physiological specialization in Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1921;8:1–62.
  • 32. Matsumoto T. Further studies on physiology of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Morioka: Imperial College of Agriculture and Forestry; 1932. (Imperial College of Agriculture and Forestry Bulletin; vol 5).
  • 33. Schultz H. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zu Ökologie, Morphologie, und Systematic der “Vermehrungpilzen”. Arb Biol Reichanst Land Forstwirtsch Berlin. 1938;22:1–141.
  • 34. Pannecoucque J, van Beneden S, Höfte M. Characterization and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia isolates associated with cauliflower in Belgium. Plant Pathol. 2008;57(4):737–746. http:/dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01823.x
  • 35. Paulitz T, Schroeder K. A new method for the quantification of Rhizoctonia solani and R. oryzae from soil. Plant Dis. 2005;89(7):767–772. http:/dx.doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-0767
  • 36. Bandoni R. Safranin O as a rapid nuclear stain for fungi. Mycologia. 1979;11(4):873–874.
  • 37. White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfland DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1990. p. 315–322.
  • 38. Guillemaut C, Edel-Hermann V, Camporota P, Alabouvette C, Richard-Molard M, Steinberg C. Typing of anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani by restriction analysis of ribosomal DNA. Can J Microbiol. 2003;49:556–558. http:/dx.doi.org/10.1139/w03-066
  • 39. Tewoldemedhin Y, Lamprecht S, McLeod A, Mazzola M. Characterization of Rhizoctonia spp. recovered from crop plants used in rotational cropping systems in the Western Cape province of South Africa. Plant Dis. 2006;90:1399–1406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-1399
  • 40. Carling D, Helm D, Leiner R. In vitro sensitivity of Rhizoctonia solani and other multinucleate and binucleate Rhizoctonia to selected fungicides. Plant Dis. 1990;74:860–863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PD-74-0860
  • 41. Kataria H, Hugelshofer U, Gisi U. Sensitivity of Rhizoctonia species to different fungicides. Plant Pathol. 1991;40:203–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1991.tb02368.x
  • 42. Campion C, Chatot C, Perratoon B, Andrivon D. Anastomosis groups, pathogenicity and sensitivity to fungicides of Rhizoctonia solani isolates collected on potato crops in France. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2003;109:983–992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EJPP.0000003829.83671.8f
  • 43. Herr L. Biological control of Rhizoctonia solani by binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. and hypovirulent R. solani agents. Crop Prot. 1995;14:179–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(95)00017-G
  • 44. Sharon M, Freeman S, Sneh B. Assessment of resistance pathways induced in Arabidopsis thaliana by hypovirulent Rhizoctonia spp. isolates. Phytopathology. 2011;101(7):828–838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/ PHYTO-09-10-0247
  • 45. Sen R. Multitrophic interactions between a Rhizoctonia sp. and mycorrhizal fungi affect Scots pine seedling performance in nursery soil. New Phytol. 2001;152:543–553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00265.x
  • 46. Hantula J, Lilja A, Veijalainen AM. Polymerase chain reaction primers for the detection of Ceratobasidium bicorne (uninucleate Rhizoctonia). For Pathol. 2002;32:231–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0329.2002.00292.x
  • 47. Grönberg H, Kaparakis G, Sen R. Binucleate Rhizoctonia (Ceratorhiza spp.) as non-mycorrhizal endophytes alter Pinus sylvestris L. seedling root architecture and affect growth of rooted cuttings. Scand J For Res. 2006;21:450–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827580601019662
  • 48. Lilja A, Lilja S, Poteri M, Ziren L, Conifer seedling root fungi and root dieback in Finnish nurseries. Scand J For Res. 1992;7:547–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827589209382746
  • 49. Lilja A. The occurrence and pathogenicity of uni- and binucleate Rhizoctonia and Pythiaceae fungi among conifer seedlings in Finnish forest nurseries. Eur J Forest Pathol. 1994;24:181–192. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1994.tb00984.x
  • 50. Hietala AM, Sen R, Lilja A. Anamorphic and teleomorphic characteristics of a uninucleate Rhizoctonia sp. isolated from the roots of nursery grown cornifer seedlings. Mycol Res. 1994;98:1044–1050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80431-0
  • 51. Hietala AM, Uni- and binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. co-existing on the roots of Norway spruce seedlings suffering from root dieback. Eur J Forest Pathol. 1995;25:136–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1995. tb00328.x
  • 52. Camporota P, Perrin R. Characterization of Rhizoctonia species involved in tree seedling damping-off in French forest nurseries. App Soil Ecol. 1998;10:65–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00040-7
  • 53. Carling DE, Baird RE, Gitaitis RD, Brainard KA, Kuninaga S. Characterization of AG-13, a newly reported anastomosis group of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology. 2002;92:893–899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/ PHYTO.2002.92.8.893

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-fd6ced76-2da0-4e13-90f4-235a5926fc83
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.