PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 26 | 5 |

Tytuł artykułu

Indicator-based assessment for soil resource management in the Wrocław larger urban zone of Poland

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
This article presents a discussion about the issue of soil resource management in the context of sustainable development. These resources are one of the basic resources on Earth, conditioning the sustainable development of present and future generations by providing the capacity for food production. The study contains an indicator-based assessment of changes in available soil resources as a result of progressive urbanization processes in the suburban area of a big city. The case study was the Wrocław Larger Urban Zone in Poland. The applied methodology allowed for the valorization of urban sprawl processes on agricultural land. As a result, municipalities were divided into groups that characterize different suburbanization processes and their impact on the available soil resources. By using the proposed approach, it is possible to support the spatial development management process in order to protect the valuable components of the environment. The results of the research show that 29 rural precincts located around Wrocław have a high soil transition index (W≥50), which proves their inefficient agricultural management system on a regional scale. The study is an attempt to answer a question on the practical implementation of sustainable development goals that were included in Agenda 2030.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

26

Numer

5

Opis fizyczny

p.2239-2248,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences,ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences,ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland
autor
  • Institute of Environmental Protection and Development, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 24, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Soil Science Erosion and Land Conservation, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, ul. Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. SETO K.C., FRAGKIAS M., GÜNERALP B., REILLY M.K. A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land Expansion. PLoS ONE. 6 (8), e23777, 2011.
  • 2. HENNIG E.I., SCHWICK C., SOUKUP T., ORLITOVÁ E., KIENAST F., JAEGER J.A.G. Multi-scale analysis of urban sprawl in Europe: Towards a European de-sprawling strategy. Land Use Policy. 49, 483, 2015.
  • 3. EEA. Land take. Report, EEA, Brussels 2013.
  • 4. STATHAKIS D., TSELIOS V., FARASLIS I. Urbanization in European regions based on night lights. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 2, 26, 2015.
  • 5. KAZAK J., SZEWRANSKI S., DECEWICZ P. Holistic Assessment of Spatial Policies for Sustainable Management: Case Study of Larger Urban Zone (Poland). [In:] D.,J. Lee et al. (Eds.) Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences, GeoJournal Library 1, 71, 2014.
  • 6. HEŁDAK M., RASZKA B., SZCZEPAŃSKI J. Design of Ground Surface Sealing in The Spatial Policy of Communes. Procedia Engineering. 161, 1367, 2016.
  • 7. ROSE J.F.P. The well-tempered city : what modern science, ancient civilizations, and human nature teach us about the future of urban life, New York, NY, Harper Wave. 2016.
  • 8. VALIPOUR M. How much meteorological information is necessary to achieve reliable accuracy for rainfall estimations? Agriculture. 6, 53, 2016.
  • 9. VALIPOUR M., GHOLAMI SEFIDKOUHI M.A., RAEINISARJAZ M. Selecting the best model to estimate potential evapotranspiration with respect to climate change and magnitudes of extreme events. Agricultural Water Management. 180, Part A, 50, 2017.
  • 10. VALIPOUR M. A Comparison between Horizontal and Vertical Drainage Systems (Include Pipe Drainage, Open Ditch Drainage, and Pumped Wells) in Anisotropic Soils. IOSRJMCE IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering. 4, 7, 2012.
  • 11. VALIPOUR M. Use of surface water supply index to assessing of water resources management in Clorado and Oregon, US. Advances in Agriculture, Sciences and Engineering Research. 3, 631, 2013.
  • 12. OLSEN A.S., ZHOU Q., LINDE J.J., ARNBJERG-NIELSEN K. Comparing methods of calculating expected annual damage in urban pluvial flood risk assessments. Water (Switzerland). 7, 255, 2015.
  • 13. HAMMOND M.J., CHEN A.S., DJORDJEVIĆ S., BUTLER D., MARK O. Urban flood impact assessment: A stateof-the-art review. Urban Water Journal. 12, 14, 2015.
  • 14. ARMENDÁRIZ V., ARMENIA S., ATZORI A. Systemic Analysis of Food Supply and Distribution Systems in City-Region Systems-An Examination of FAO’s Policy Guidelines towards Sustainable Agri-Food Systems. Agriculture. 6, 65, 2016.
  • 15. OLSSON E., KERSELAERS E., SØDERKVIST KRISTENSEN L., PRIMDAHL J., ROGGE E., WÄSTFELT A. Peri-Urban Food Production and Its Relation to Urban Resilience. Sustainability. 8, 1340, 2016.
  • 16. ROSADO L., KALMYKOVA Y., PATRÍCIO J. Urban metabolism profiles. An empirical analysis of the material flow characteristics of three metropolitan areas in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production. 126, 206, 2016.
  • 17. CONKE L.S., FERREIRA T.L. Urban metabolism: Measuring the city's contribution to sustainable development. Environmental Pollution. 202, 146, 2015.
  • 18. PORKKA M., GERTEN D., SCHAPHOFF S., SIEBERT, S., KUMMU M. Causes and trends of water scarcity in food production. Environmental Research Letters. 11 (1), 2016.
  • 19. JÄGERMEYR J., GERTEN D., SCHAPHOFF S., HEINKE J., LUCHT W., ROCKSTRÖM J. Integrated crop water management might sustainably halve the global food gap. Environmental Research Letters. 11 (1), 2016.
  • 20. AMUNDSON R., BERHE A.A., HOPMANS J.W., OLSON C., SZTEIN A.E. SPARKS D.L. Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science. 348, 647, 2015.
  • 21. STOATE C., BÁLDI A., BEJA P., BOATMAN N.D., HERZON I., VAN DOORN A., DE SNOO G.R., RAKOSY L., RAMWELL C. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe – A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 91 (1), 22, 2009.
  • 22. HOFMANN M.E., HINKEL J., WROBEL M. Classifying knowledge on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability in Europe for informing adaptation research and decision-making: A conceptual meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change. 21 (3), 1106, 2011.
  • 23. HERNIK J., GAWROŃSKI K., DIXON-GOUGH R. Social and economic conflicts between cultural landscapes and rural communities in the English and Polish systems. Land Use Policy. 30, 800, 2013.
  • 24. COISNON T., OUESLATI W., SALANIÉ J. Spatial targeting of agri-environmental policy and urban development. Ecological Economics. 101, 33, 2014.
  • 25. COISNON T., OUESLATI W., SALANIÉ J. Urban sprawl occurrence under spatially varying agricultural amenities. Regional Science and Urban Economic. 44, 38, 2014.
  • 26. KRISTENSEN S.B.P. Agriculture and landscape interactionlandowners’ decision-making and drivers of land use change in rural Europe. Land Use Policy. 57, 759, 2016.
  • 27. ESKANDARI S., HOSSEINI S. A. Assessment of Drainage System Standards of Forest Roads in Iran Using GIS. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 22, 675, 2013.
  • 28. ZIVOTIC L., PEROVIC V., JARAMAZ D., DORDEVIC A., PETROVIC R., TODOROVIC M. Application of USLE, GIS, and Remote Sensing in the Assessment of Soil Erosion Rates in Southeastern Serbia. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 21, 1929, 2012.
  • 29. HOU K., LI X.X., WANG J.J., ZHANG J. Evaluating Ecological Vulnerability Using the GIS and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method in Yan›an, China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 25, 599, 2016.
  • 30. GUTRY-KORYCKA M. Urban sprawl: Warsaw agglomeration : case study. Warsaw University Press. 2005.
  • 31. PETROSILLO I., DE MARCO A., BOTTA S., COMOGLIO C. EMAS in local authorities: Suitable indicators in adopting environmental management systems. Ecological Indicators. 13 (1), 263, 2012.
  • 32. CARSJENS G., LIGTENBERG A. A GIS-based support tool for sustainable spatial planning in metropolitan areas. Landscape and Urban Planning. 80, 72, 2007.
  • 33. COTTER M., BERKHOFF K., GIBREEL T., GHORBANI A., GOLBON R., NUPPENAU E.-A., SAUERBORN J. Designing a sustainable land use scenario based on a combination of ecological assessments and economic optimization. Ecological Indicators. 36, 779, 2014.
  • 34. MAUELSHAGEN C., SMITH M., SCHILLER F., DENYER D., ROCKS S., POLLARD S. Effective risk governance for environmental policy making: A knowledge management perspective. Environmental Science & Policy. 41, 23, 2014.
  • 35. DUBEL A., JAMONTT-SKOTIS M., KRÓLIKOWSKA K., STEFAŃSKA J., BANROWSKA A. The effective management of Natura 2000 sites. Stowarzyszenie CRS, GS Kraków. 2010.
  • 36. MARINONI O., HIGGINS A., COAD P., NAVARRO GARCIA J. Directing urban development to the right places: Assessing the impact of urban development on water quality in an estuarine environment. Landscape and Urban Planning. 113, 62, 2013.
  • 37. NGUYEN T.T., VERDOODT A., VAN Y.T., DELBECQUE N., TRAN T.C., VAN RANST E. Design of a GIS and multi-criteria based land evaluation procedure for sustainable land-use planning at the regional level. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 200, 1, 2015.
  • 38. KRELLENBERG K., LINK F., WELZ J., HARRIS J., BARTH K., IRARRAZAVAL F. Supporting local adaptation: The contribution of socio-environmental fragmentation to urban vulnerability. Applied Geography. 55, 61, 2014.
  • 39. PILEHFOROOSHHA P., KARIMI M.,TALEAI M. A GIS-based agricultural land-use allocation model coupling increase and decrease in land demand. Agricultural Systems. 130, 116, 2014.
  • 40. SKOG K. L., STEINNES M. How do centrality, population growth and urban sprawl impact farmland conversion in Norway? Land Use Policy. 59, 185, 2016.
  • 41. FERRARA A., SALVATI L., SABBI A., COLANTONI A. Soil resources, land cover changes and rural areas: Towards a spatial mismatch? Science of The Total Environment, 478, 116, 2014.
  • 42. European Environment Agency. Soil quality index map. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/soil-quality-index-map, 2009.
  • 43. COLANTONI A., GRIGORIADIS E., SATERIANO A., VENANZONI G., SALVATI L. Cities as selective land predators? A lesson on urban growth, deregulated planning and sprawl containment. Science of The Total Environment. 545-546, 329, 2016.
  • 44. SALVATI L. Land availability vs conversion by use type: A new approach for land take monitoring. Ecological Indicators. 36, 221, 2014.
  • 45. MANTAS V.M., MARQUES J.C., PEREIRA A.J.S.C. A geospatial approach to monitoring impervious surfaces in watersheds using Landsat data (the Mondego Basin, Portugal as a case study). Ecological Indicators. 71, 449, 2016.
  • 46. YANG L., XIAN G.Z., KLAVER J.M., DEAL B. Urban land-cover change detection through sub-pixel imperviousness mapping using remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 69, 1003, 2003.
  • 47. JAEGER J.A.G., SCHWICK C. Improving the measurement of urban sprawl: Weighted Urban Proliferation (WUP) and its application to Switzerland. Ecological Indicators. 38, 294, 2014.
  • 48. STUCZYŃSKI T. Assessment an modelling of land use change in Europe in the context of soil protection. IUNG Pulawy. 2007.
  • 49. BIAŁOUSZ S., MARCINEK J., STUCZYŃSKI T., TURSKI R. Soil Survey, Monitoring and Databases in Poland. [In:] R.J.A. Jones, B. Houšková, P. Bullock and L. Montanarella (Eds.) European Soil Bureau, Research Report No. 9, 2005.
  • 50. TERELAK H., WITEK T. Poland [In:] J.A. Zink (Ed.), Soil Survey: Perspectives and Strategies for the 21st Century, FAO. 1995.
  • 51. WITEK T. Valorisation of agricultural production area. IUNG, Puławy. 1981.
  • 52. SIEBIELEC G., LOPATKA A., STUCZYNSKI T., KOZAK M., GLUSZCZYNSKA M., KOZA J., ZUREK A., KORZENIOWSKA-PUCULEK R. Assessment of Soil Protection Efficiency And Land Use Change. Urban SMS Report. 2010.
  • 53. UN. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1, 2015.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-fabb2ae8-3574-4a15-b534-2c27f80516a5
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.