Taxonomic implications of morphometric analysis of earless seal limb bones

• Autorzy: Churchill M. , Uhen M.D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Fossil Phocidae (earless seals) are mostly known from isolated postcranial material, forcing researchers to rely upon humeri and femora for the diagnosis of taxa and reconstruction of phylogeny. However, the utility of these elements has never been rigorously tested. Here, we provide the first quantitative analysis of morphometric data from the humerus and femur, incorporating measurement data from all extant genera as well as several fossil taxa. Principle components analysis (PCA) found that genera clustered together on PC1 and PC2, although there was poor segregation of taxa and extensive overlap with genera in adjacent regions of the morphospace. Discriminant function analysis (DFA) was able to sort fossil taxa into different subfamilies, but performed poorly at lower taxonomic levels. A preliminary review of phylogenetic characters found that while some characters performed well at distinguishing different subfamilies, many characters were poorly defined and not quantified, possessed greater individual variation than past studies suggested, or were more variable in fossil taxa. Our analyses suggest that the utility of isolated humeri and femora for diagnosis of new taxa has been greatly exaggerated, and that extreme caution should be applied to interpretations of taxonomy of fossil material based on isolated elements. Future research should instead focus on study of associated skeletons and cranial material. A thorough revision of fossil phocid taxonomy is needed, and many described taxa are likely to be nomina dubia and of limited use in phylogenetic analysis.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 64
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.213-230,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Churchill M.

• Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin, 800 Algoma Blvd., Oshkosh WI 54901, USA

autor

Uhen M.D.

• Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences, George Mason University, 4400 University Dr., Fairfax, VA 22030, USA

Bibliografia

• Amson, E. and Muizon, C. 2013. A new durophagous phocid (Mammalia: Carnivora) from the late Neogene of Peru and considerations on monachine seal phylogeny. Journal of Systematic Paleontology 12: 523–548.
• Berta, A. and Wyss, A.R. 1994. Pinniped phylogeny. In: A. Berta and T.A. Deméré (eds.), Contributions in Marine Mammal Paleontology Honoring Frank C. Whitmore, Jr. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History 29: 33–56.
• Berta, A., Churchill, M., and Boessenecker, R.W. 2018. The origin and evolutionary biology of pinnipeds: seals, sea lions, and walruses. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 46: 203–228.
• Berta, A., Kienle, S., Bianucci, G., and Sorbi, S. 2015. A re-evaluation of Pliophoca etrusca (Pinnipedia, Phocidae) from the Pliocene of Italy: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 35: e889144.
• Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P. and Russell, A.P. 1996. A morphological perspective on the phylogenetic relationships of the extant phocid seals (Mammalia: Carnivora: Phocidae). Bonner, Zoologische Monographien 41:1–256.
• Boessenecker, R.W. and Churchill, M. 2016. The origin of elephant seals: implications of a fragmentary late Pliocene seal (Phocidae: Miroungini) from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 59: 544–550.
• Boroni, N.L., Lobo, L.S., Romano, P.S.R., and Lessa, G. 2017. Taxonomic identification using geometric morphometric approach and limited data: and example using the upper molars of two sympatric species of Calomys (Cricetidae: Rodentia). Zoologia (Curitiba) 34: 1–11.
• Churchill, M. and Boessenecker, R.W. 2016. Taxonomy and biogeography of the Pleistocene New Zealand sea lion Neophoca palatina (Carnivora: Otariidae). Journal of Paleontology 90: 375–388.
• Committee on Taxonomy 2018. List of Marine Mammal Species and Subspecies. Society for Marine Mammalogy www.marinemammalscience.org (accessed 01.12.2018).
• Cozzuol, M.A. 2001. A “northern” seal from the Miocene of Argentina: implications for phocid phylogeny and biogeography. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21: 415–421.
• Cullen, T.M., Fraser, D., Rybczynski, N., and Schröder-Adams, C. 2014. Early Evolution of sexual dimorphism and polygyny in Pinnipedia. Evolution 68: 1469–1484.
• Davis, C.S., Delisle, I., Stirling, I., Siniff, D.B., and Strobeck, C. 2004. A phylogeny of extant Phocidae inferred from complete mitochondrial DNA coding regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 363–377.
• Dewaele, L., Amson, E., Lambert, O., and Louwye, S. 2017a. Reappraisal of the extinct seal “Phoca” vitulinoides from the Neogene of the North Sea Basin, with bearing on its geological age, phylogenetic affinities, and locomotion. PeerJ 5: e3316.
• Dewaele, L., Lambert, O., and Louwye, S. 2017b. On Prophoca and Leptophoca (Pinnipedia, Phocidae) from the Miocene of the North Atlantic realm: redescription, phylogenetic affinities, and paleobiogeographic implications. PeerJ 5: e3024.
• Dewaele, L., Lambert, O., and Louwye, S. 2018a. A critical revision of the fossil record, stratigraphy, and diversity of the Neogene seal genus Monotherium (Carnivora, Phocidae). Royal Society Open Science 5: 171669.
• Dewaele, L., Peredo, C.M., Meyvisch, P., and Louwye, S. 2018b. Diversity of late Neogene Monachinae (Carnivora, Phocidae) from the North Atlantic, with the description of two new species. Royal Society Open Science 5: 172437.
• Drake, A.G., Coquerelle, M., and Colombeau, G. 2015. 3D morphometric analysis of fossil canid skulls contradict the suggested domestication of dogs during the late Paleolithic. Scientific Reports 5: 8299.
• Ehret, D.J., MacFadden, B.J., Jones, D.S., DeVries, T.J., Foster, D.A., and Gismondi, R.S. 2012. Origin of the White Shark Carcharodon (Lamniformes: Lamnidae) based on recalibration of the Upper Neogene Pisco Formation of Peru. Palaeontology 55: 1139–1153.
• Fulton, T.L. and Strobeck, C. 2010a. Multiple fossil calibrations, nuclear loci and mitochondrial genomes provide new insight into biogeography and divergence timing for true seals (Phocidae, Pinnipedia). Journal of Biogeography 37: 814–829.
• Fulton, T.L. and Strobeck, C. 2010b. Multiple markers and multiple individuals refine true seal phylogeny and bring molecules and morphology back in line. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 277: 1065–1070.
• Gould, S.J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Review 41: 587–640.
• Govender, R., Chinsamy, A., and Ackermann, R.R. 2012. Anatomical and landmark morphometric analysis of fossil phocid seal remains from Langebaanweg, West Coast of South Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 67: 135–149.
• Higdon, J.W., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Beck, R.M.D., and Ferguson, S.H. 2007. Phylogeny and divergence of the pinnipeds (Carnivora: Mammalia) assessed using a multigene dataset. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 216.
• King, J.E. 1966. Relationships of the hooded and elephant seals (genera Cystophora and Mirounga). Journal of Zoology 148: 385–398.
• Koretsky, I.A. 2001. Morphology and systematics of Miocene Phociane (Mammalia: Carnivora) from Paratethys and the North Atlantic region. Geologica hungarica 54: 1–109.
• Koretsky, I.A. and Barnes, L.G. 2006. Pinniped evolutionary history and paleobiogeography. In: Z. Csiki (eds.), Mesozoic and Cenozoic Vertebrates and Paleoenvironments: Tributes to the Career of Prof. Dan Grigorescu, 143–153. Ars Docendi, Bucharest.
• Koretsky, I.A. and Domning, D.P. 2014. One of the oldest seals (Carnivora: Phocidae) from the Old World. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 34: 224–229.
• Koretsky, I.A. and Grigorescu, D. 2002. The fossil monk seal Pontophoca sarmatica (Alekseev) (Mammalia: Phocidae: Monachinae) from the Miocene of eastern Europe. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 93: 149–163.
• Koretsky, I.A. and Holec, P. 2002. A primitive seal (Mammalia: Phoci dae) from the early Middle Miocene of Central Paratethys. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 93: 163–178.
• Koretsky, I.A. and Rahmat, S.J. 2013. First record of fossil Cystophorinae (Carnivora, Phocidae): Middle Miocene seals from the northern Paratethys. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 119: 325–350.
• Koretsky, I.A. and Ray, C.E. 2008. Phocidae of the Pliocene of eastern USA. In: C.E. Ray, D.J. Bohaska, I.A. Koretsky, L.W. Ward, and L.G. Barnes (eds.), Geology and Paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, IV. Virginia Museum of Natural History Publications 6: 81–140.
• Koretsky, I.A., Peters, N., and Rahmat, S.J. 2015. New species of Prae pusa (Carnivora, Phocidae, Phocinae) from the Netherlands supports east to west Neogene dispersal of true seals. Vestnik Zoologii 49: 57–66.
• Koretsky, I.A., Ray, C.E., and Peters, N. 2012. A new species of Leptophoca (Carnivora, Phocidae, Phocinae) from both sides of the North Atlantic Ocean (Miocene seals of the Netherlands, part I). Deinsea 15: 1–12.
• Muizon, C. 1981. Les vertébrés fossiles de la Formation Pisco (Pérou). Première parti: Deux nouveaux Monachina (Phocidae, Mammalia) du Pliocène de Sud-Sacaco. Recherche sur les grandes civilisations, Memo ire 6: 1–150.
• Muizon, C. 1982. Phocid phylogeny and dispersal. The Annals of the South African Museum 89: 175–213.
• Muizon, C. and Bond, M. 1982. Le Phocidae (Mammalia) miocène de la formation Paraná (Entre Ríos, Argentine). Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle Section C 4: 165–207.
• R Core Team 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/.
• Rahmat, S.J. and Koretsky, I.A. 2016. First record of postcranial bones in Devinophoca emryi (Carnivora, Phocidae, Devinophocinae). Vestnik Zoologii 50: 71–84.
• Ray, C.E. 1976. Geography of phocid evolution. Systematic Zoology 25: 391–406.
• Rodriguez, S.G., Morgan, C.C., Soibelzon, L.H., and Lynch, E. 2016. Intraand interspecific variation in tooth morphology of Procyon cancrivorous and P. lotor (Carnivora, Procyonidae), and its bearing on the taxonomy of fossil South American procyonids. Hystrix, The Italian Journal of Mammalogy 27 (2) [published online: https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-27.2-11647].
• Van Beneden, P.J. 1877. Description des ossements fossiles des environs d’Anvers. Première partie. Pinnipèdes ou amphithèriens. Annales du Musèe Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique 1: 1–88
• Vangengeim, E.A., Lungu, A.N., and Tesakov, A.S. 2006. Age of the Vallesian lower boundary (continental Miocene of Europe). Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 14: 655–667.
• Vogt, P., Eshelman, R.E., and Godfrey, S.J. 2018. Calvert Cliffs: eroding mural escarpment, fossil dispensary, and paleoenvironmental archive in space and time. In: S.J. Godfrey (eds.), The Geology and Vertebrate Paleontology of Calvert Cliffs, Maryland USA, 3–44. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington D.C.
• Wyss, A.R. 1988. On “retrogression” in the evolution of the Phocinae and phylogenetic affinities of the monk seals. American Museum Novitates 2924: 1–38.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4202/app.00607.2019