Morphometric characteristics of alien crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus from Maninjau lake (West Sumatra, Indonesia)

• Autorzy: Purnamasari L. , Kasmeri R. , Fu'adil Amin M.H. , Soegianto A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Morfometryczna charakterystyka obcego gatunku raka Cherax quadricarinatus z jeziora Maninjau (Sumatra Zachodnia, Indonezja)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objectives of this study were to determine the length – weight relationships (LWRs), carapace-length relationships, sexual dimorphism and condition factors (K) of Cherax quadricarinatus from Maninjau Lake, West Sumatra Indonesia. The sex ratio (male: female) was found close to 1:1 in Bayur and Sigiran at period of February 2017 respectively, and 1.51:1 in Bayur on October 2017. The LWRs for males and females crayfish were W = 0.053L2.56 andW = 0.058L2.54 (Bayur, Feb 2017), W = 0.029L2.86 andW = 0.100L2.31 (Sigiran, February 2017) and W = 0.078L2.51 and 0.071L2.49 (Bayur, October 2017). There was no significant difference between length and weight of males and females from all stations at all periods. Similarly, carapace length and carapace width of males and females of crayfish were not significantly different from all sampling locations at all periods. However, at the same carapace length, male crayfish had longer chelae than female at all locations

PL

Celem badania było ustalenie zależności między: długością a ciężarem (LWR), karapaksem a długością oraz dymorfizmem płciowym i kondycją (K) u Cherax quadricarinatus z jeziora Ma-ninjau w Sumatrze Zachodnioindyjskiej. Stosunek płci (samiec: samica) zbliżony do 1: 1 obserwo-wano w Bayur i Sigiran w lutym 2017 r. oraz 1,51: 1 w Bayur w październiku 2017 r. LWR dla samców i samic raków wynosiły: W = 0,053L2,56 i W = 0,058L2,54 (Bayur, luty 2017), W = 0,029L2.86 i W = 0,100L2,31 (Sigiran, luty 2017) i W = 0,078L2,51 i 0,071L2,49 (Bayur, paź-dziernik 2017). We wszystkich okresach nie było istotnej różnicy między długością i masą sam-ców i samic ze wszystkich stanowisk. Podobnie długość pancerza i szerokość karapaksu u samców i samic raków nie różniły się znacząco we wszystkich miejscach pobierania próbek we wszystkich okresach. W każdej lokalizacji jednak raki płci męskiej, mające taką samą długość pancerza co samice, były dłuższe niż samice

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Natural Sciences
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 33
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.369-383,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Purnamasari L.

• Study Program of Biology Education, STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat (College of Teacher Training and Education), Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia

autor

Kasmeri R.

• Study Program of Biology Education, STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat (College of Teacher Training and Education), Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia

autor

Fu'adil Amin M.H.

• Department of Biology, Airlangga University in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia

autor

Soegianto A.

• Department of Biology, Airlangga University in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• ABRAHAMSSONS.A.A. 1971. Density, growth and reproduction in populations ofAstacus astacusand Pacifastacus leniusculusin an isolated pond. Oikos, 22: 373–380.
• ACOSTAC.A., PERRYS.A. 2000. Differential growth of crayfish Procambarus alleni in relation to hydrological conditions in marl prairie wetlands of Everglades National Park, USA. Aquatic Ecology, 34: 389−395.
• AHYONGS.T., YEOD.C.J. 2007. Feral populations of the Australian red-claw crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus von Martens) in water supply catchments of Singapore. Biological Invasions, 9: 943–946.
• ALEKHNOVICHA.V., ABLOVS.E., KULESHV.F., PAREIKOO.A. 1999. The American spiny-cheek crayfish, Orconectes limosus in the fauna of Belarus. In: Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation? Eds. F. gherardi, D.M. hoLdich. Rotterdam, Brookfield: A.A. Balkema, pp. 237–242.
• ANDERSONW.E., SIMONT.P. 2015. Length-weight relationship, body morphometrics, and condition based on sexual stage in the rusty crayfish,Orconectes rusticusGirard, 1852 (Decapoda, Cam-baridae) with Emphasis on Management Implications. Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal, 6: 3.austinC.M. 1995. Length-weight relationships of cultured species of Australian freshwater crayfish of the genus Cherax. Freshwater Crayfish, 10: 410–418.
• AYDIN H., HARLIOGLUM.M., DENIZ T. 2015. An investigation on the population parameters of freshwater crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus Esch., 1823) in Lake Iznik (Bursa). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 39: 660–668.
• BORTOLINIJ.L., ALVAREZ F., RODRIGUEZ-ALMARAZ G. 2007. On the presence of the Australian redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus, in Mexico. Biological Invasions, 9: 615–620 DOI: 10.1007/s10530-006-9054-0.
• CAPURRO M., GALLI L., MORI M., SALVIDIO S., ARILLO A. 2007. The signal crayfish, Pacifastacus le-niusculus (Dana, 1852) [Crustacea: Decapoda: Astacidae], in the Brugneto Lake (Liguria, NW Italy). The beginning of the invasion of the River Po watershed? Aquatic Invasions, 2: 17–24.
• CHIENY.H., AVAULTJ.W. JR. 1983. Effects of flooding dates and disposals of rice straw on cray-fish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard), culture in rice fields. Aquaculture, 31: 339–359.
• COUGHRAN J., LECKIE S. 2007. Invasion of a New South Wales stream by the Tropical Cray-fish, Cherax quadricarinatus (von Martens). In: Pest or guest: the zoology of overabundance.Eds. D. LUNNEY, P. EBY, P. HUTCHINGS, S. BURGIN, MOSMAN, NSW, Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, pp. 40–46.
• DENIZ BOK T., HARLIOGLUM.M., DEVALM.C. 2010. A study on the morphometric characteristics of Astacus leptodactylus inhabiting the Thrace region of Turkey. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 397: 05, doi: 10.1051/kmae/2010021.
• DINA R., WOWOR D., HAMDANIA A. 2013. Fresh water crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus), new alien species in Maninjau Lake, West Sumatera. Limnotek, 20(2): 159–168.
• ĎURIŠ Z., DROZD P., HORKÁ I., KOZÁK P., POLICAR T. 2006. Biometry and demography of the inva-sive crayfish Orconectes limosus in the Czech Republic. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture, 380–381: 1215–1228
• EDGERTON B.F. 2005. Freshwater crayfish production for poverty alleviation. World Aquaculture, 36: 48–64.
• FENOUIL E., CHAIXJ.C. 1985. Biological cycle and behavior of a population ofAustropotamobius pallipes. Ecologia Mediterranea, 11: 3–24.
• GHERARDI F., VILLANELLI F., DARDI P. 1997. Behavioural ecology of the white-clawed crayfish,Austropotamobius pallipes, in a Tuscan stream: preliminary results. Freshwater Crayfish,11: 182–193.
• GRANDJEAN F., CORNUAULT B., ARCHAMBAULT S., BRANDMARD M., OTREBSKY G. 2000. Life history and population biology of the white-clawed crayfish,Austropotamobius pallipes, in a brook from the Poitou-Charentes Region (France). Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture, 356: 55–70
• HOBBSH.H. JR., JASSJ.P., HUNERJ.V. 1989. A review of global crayfish introductions with particular emphasis on two North American species (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana, 56: 229–316.
• HOLDICHD.M. 2001. Biology of freshwater crayfish. Oxford England, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 512 pp.
• HOLTHUISL.B. 1949. Decapoda Macrura, with a revision of the New Guinea Parastacidae.Zoo-logical results of the Dutch New Guinea. Expedition 1939, No. 3. Nova Guinea, 5: 289–328.
• HUNERJ.V., ROMAIRER.P. 1979. Size at maturity as a means of comparing populations of Procam-barus clarkii (Girard) (Crustacea, Decapoda) from different habitats. Freshwater Crayfish, 4: 53–64.
• JAKLIČ M., VREZEC A. 2011.The first tropical alien crayfish species in European waters: the redc-lawCherax quadricarinatus(von Martens, 1868) (Decapoda, Parastacidae). Crustaceana, 84(5–6): 651–665. DOI: 10.1163/001121611X577936.
• KIRJAVAINEN J., WESTMAN K. 1999. Natural history and development of the introduced signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, in a small, isolated Finnish lake, from 1968 to 1993. Aquatic Living Resources, 12: 387–401.
• KURNIAWAN W., SAPUTRAS.W. 2016. Some aspects biological of freshwater crayfish (Cherax qu-adricarinatus) captured with trap in Rawa Pening Waters, Semarang Regency. Diponegoro Journal of Maquares, 5(1): 24–31.
• LAWRENCE C., JONES C. 2002. Chapter 17. Cherax. In: Biology of freshwater crayfish. Ed. D.M. hoL-dich, London, Blackwell.
• LINDQVISTO.V., LAHTI E. 1983. On the sexual dimorphism and condition index in the crayfish, Astacus astacus L., in Finland. Freshwater Crayfish, 5: 3–11.
• LOUGHMANZ.J., SIMONT.P. 2011. Zoogeography, taxonomy, and conservation of West Virginia’s Ohio River floodplain crayfishes (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Zookeys, 74: 1–78.
• MAGUIRE I., KLOBUCAR G. 2011. Size structure, maturity size, growth and condition index of stone crayfish (Austropotamobius torrentium) in North-West Croatia. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 401: 12. DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2011026.
• MAZLUM Y., EVERSOLE A.G. 2005. Growth and survival ofProcambarus acutus acutus(Girard, 1852) andP. clarkii(Girard, 1852) in competitive settings. Aquaculture Research, 36: 537–545.
• MAZLUM Y., FATIH M., EVERSOLE A. 2007. Morphometric relationship of length weight and chelea length-width of eastern white river crayfish (Procambarus actus actus, Girard, 1852), under culture conditions. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23:616–620.
• NAKATA K., GOSHIMA S. 2003. Competition for shelter of preferred sizes between the native crayfish species Cambaroides japonicusand the alien crayfish species Pacifastacus leniusculusin Japan in relation to prior residence, sex difference, and body size. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 23: 897–907.
• NYSTROM P. 2002. Ecology. In: Biology of freshwater crayfish. Ed. D.M. HoLdich. Blackwell Scien-ce, Oxford, pp. 190–235.
• NUNESA.L., ZENGEYAA.T., HOFFMANA.C., MEASEYG.J., WEILO.L.F. 2017. Distribution and es-tablishment of the alien Australian redclaw crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus, in South Africa and Swaziland. PeerJ 19;5: e3135; DOI 10.7717/peerj.3135.
• PATOKA J., WARDIATNO Y., YONVITNER, KUŘÍKOVÁ P., PETRTY M., KALOUS L. 2016. Cherax quadricarinatus(von Martens) has invaded Indonesian territory west of the Wallace Line: evidences from Java. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 417: 39. DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2016026.
• PRICEJ.E., WELCHS.M. 2009. Semi-quantitative methods for crayfish sampling: sex, size, and habitat bias. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 29: 208–216.
• Redclaw crayfish information package. 2002. Ed. C.M. Jones. Department of Primary Industries, Northern Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre, Cairns, Queensland.
• RICKERW.E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations.Bulletin of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 191: 1–382.
• RODRIGUEZ A., ARREDONDOC.J.L., PONCEF.J.T., ROUSEP.D.B. 2002. Growth characteristics of the Australian redclaw crayfish. Cherax quadricarinatus, cultured in an indoor recircula-ting system. Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 12(3): 59–64.
• ROMAIRER.P., FORESTERJ.S., AVAULTJ.W. JR. 1977. Length-weight relationships of two commer-cially important crayfishes of the genus Procambarus. Freshwater Crayfish, 3: 463–470.
• SIMONT.P., STEWARTC.R. 2014. Growth, length-weight relationships, and condition associated with gender and sexual stage in the invasive northern crayfish,Orconectes virilisHagen, 1870 (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Proceedings of Indiana Academy of Science, 123(2): 1–8.
• SNOVSKY G., GALILB.S. 2011. The Australian redclaw cray fishCherax quadricarinatus(von Martens, 1868) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastactidae) in the Sea of Galilee, Israel. Aquatic Invasions,6: S29–S31. DOI: 10.3391/ai.2011.6.S1.007.
• SOUTY-GROSSET C., HOLDICHD.M., NOËLP.Y., REYNOLDS J., HAFFNER P. 2006. Atlas of crayfish in Europe. Paris, France, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 187 pp.
• STEINR.A. 1976. Sexual dimorphism in crayfish chelae: functional significance linked to reproduc-tive activities. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 54: 220–227.
• STREISSL F., HODL W. 2002. Growth, morphometrics, size at maturity, sexual dimorphism and condition index ofAustropotamobius torrentium Schrank.Hydrobiologia, 477:201–208.
• VORBURGER C., RIBI G. 1999. Pacifastacus leniusculus and Austropotamobius torrentium prefer different substrates. Freshwater Crayfish, 10: 696−704.
• WANG Q., YANG W., ZHOU G., ZHU Y., SAN H. 2011. Length-weight and chelae length-width rela-tionships of the crayfishProcambarus clarkii under culture conditions. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 26: 287–294.
• WESTMAN K., PURSIAINEN M. 1982. Size and structure of crayfish (Astacus astacus) populations on different habitats in Finland. In: Lakes and Water Management Proceedings of the 30 Years Jubilee. Eds. V. IIMAVIRTA, R.I. JONES, P.E. Persson. Symposium of the Finnish Limnological Society, held in Helsinki, Finland, 22–23 September 1980. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia, 86(1/2), 67–80.
• WESTMAN K., SUMARI O., PURSIAINEN M. 1979. Electric fishing in sampling crayfish. Freshwater Crayfish, 4: 251–256.
• WETZELJ.E. 2002. Form alternation of adult female crayfishes of the genusOrconectes (Decapoda: Cambaridae). American Midland Naturalist, 147: 326–337.
• WEYAJ.M., RUMBIAKN.S., HARIYANTO S., IRAWAN B., SOEGIANTO A. 2017. Length-weight relationship and condition factor of crayfish from South Sorong and Jayawijaya, Papua, Indonesia. Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 75: 18–24. DOI: 10.1515/cjf-2017-0004.
• ZARJ.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.