PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 66 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Impacts of environmental heterogeneity on distribution pattern of moss crust patches in temperate desert in Central Asia

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Moss crusts are the highest developmental stage of biological crusts in arid and semiarid ecosystems worldwide. Under natural conditions, elementary functional units of moss crusts are patches. However, to date, the quantitative features, distribution pattern, ecological effect and relationship with environmental factors of moss patches in desert ecosystems remain unclear. In this study, 3303 moss patches in 22 plots and relevant environmental variables were investigated and quantified in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China. Thirty-six patch classes were defined. Moss crusts accounted on average for 11.7% of the plot area, and the mean moss patch area was 23.4 cm². Small patches dominated, indicating a serious fragmentation of moss crusts. Significant density-dependent effects between patch density and size, humped relationships between patch size and moss plant density, and soil water content under moss patches were observed. The overall distribution of moss crusts showed a tendency of moss patch size and moss plant density decreasing from the southeastern part of the desert to the northwestern part, while moss patch density showed the opposite trend. Pearson's correlation analysis and nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis consistently demonstrated that the distributions of moss patches were dominantly influenced by non-moss crust coverage, sand particle size, latitude, mean annual precipitation (MAP) and mean annual temperature. Of these parameters, fine sand, high MAP and low latitude were beneficial to the development of moss crusts. Consequently, the factors influencing the distribution pattern of moss crusts are complex and contain the soil factor, current climatic conditions and natural and human disturbances.
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
66
Numer
2
Opis fizyczny
p.83-101,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Agricultural College, Shihezi University, North 4th Road, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, P.R. China
  • Key Laboratory of Special Fruits and Vegetables Cultivation, Physiology and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Xinjiang Production and Construction Group, Shihezi, Xinjiang, P.R. China
autor
  • Agricultural College, Shihezi University, North 4th Road, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, P.R. China
  • Key Laboratory of Special Fruits and Vegetables Cultivation, Physiology and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Xinjiang Production and Construction Group, Shihezi, Xinjiang, P.R. China
autor
  • Agricultural College, Shihezi University, North 4th Road, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, P.R. China
  • Key Laboratory of Special Fruits and Vegetables Cultivation, Physiology and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Xinjiang Production and Construction Group, Shihezi, Xinjiang, P.R. China
Bibliografia
  • Anderson D.C., Harper K.T., Holmgren R.C. 1982 – Factors influencing development of cryptogamic soil crusts in Utah deserts – J. Range Manage. 35: 180–185.
  • Bao S.D. 2000 – Agriculture Soil Chemical Analysis, third ed. – Science Press, Beijing, China.
  • Belnap J. 2003 – The world at your feet: Desert biological soil crusts – Front. Ecol. Environ. 4: 181–189.
  • Belnap J., Phillips S.L., Smith S.D. 2007 – Dynamics of cover, UV-protective pigments, and quantum yield in biological soil crust communities of an undisturbed Mojave Desert shrubland – Flora, 202: 674–686.
  • Bowker M.A., Belnap J., Büdel B., Sannier C., Pietrasiak N., Eldridge D.J., Rivera-Aguilar V. 2016 – Controls on Distribution Patterns of Biological Soil Crusts at Microto Global Scales (In: Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands, Eds: B. Weber, B. Büdel, J. Belnap) – Ecological Studies, 226: 173–191, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30214-0_10.
  • Bowker M.A., Belnap J., Davidson D.W., Goldstein H. 2006 – Correlates of biological soil crust abundance across a continuum of spatial scales: Support for a hierarchical conceptual model – J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 152–163.
  • Bowker M.A., Maestre F.T., Eldridge D., Belnap J., Castillo-Monroy A., Escolar C., Soliveres S. 2014 – Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) as a model system in community, landscape and ecosystem ecology – Biodivers. Conserv. 23: 1619–1637.
  • Bowker M.A., Maestre F.T., Escolar C. 2010 – Biological crusts as a model system for examining the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship in soils – Soil Biol. Biochem. 42: 405–417.
  • Bu C.F., Zhang P., Wang C., Yang Y.S., Shao H.B., Wu S.F. 2016 – Spatial distribution of biological soil crusts on the slope of the Chinese Loess Plateau based on canonical correspondence analysis – CATENA, 137: 373–381.
  • Bu C.F., Wu S.F., Zhang K.K., Yang Y.S. 2015 – Biological soil crusts: an eco-adaptive biological conservative mechanism and implications for ecological restoration — Plant Biosyst. 2: 364–373.
  • Chamizo S., Cantón Y., Lázaro R., Domingo F. 2013 – The role of biological soil crusts in soil moisture dynamics in two semiarid ecosystems with contrasting soil textures – J. Hydrol. 489: 74–84.
  • Chamizo S., Cantón Y., Miralles I, Domingo F. 2012 – Biological soil crust development affects physicochemical characteristics of soil surface in semiarid ecosystems – Soil Biol. Biochem. 49: 96–105.
  • Chen F.H., Huang W., Jin L.Y., Chen J.H., Wang J.S. 2011 – Spatiotemporal precipitation variations in the arid Central Asia in the context of global warming – Sci. China Earth Sci. 41: 1647–1657.
  • Cheng J.H., Zhang Y.M. 2010 – Environmental factors affecting soil bio-crust distribution – Chin. J. Ecol. 29: 133–141.
  • Concostrina-Zubiri L., Huber-Sannwald E., Martínez I., Flores J.L., Escudero A. 2013 – Biological soil crusts greatly contribute to small-scale soil heterogeneity along a grazing gradient – Soil Biol. Biochem. 64: 28–36.
  • Cornwell W.K., Grubb P.J. 2003 – Regional and local patterns in plant species richness with respect to resource availability – Oikos, 100: 417–428.
  • Costanza J.K., Moody A., Peet R.K. 2011 – Multi-scale environmental heterogeneity as a predictor of plant species richness – Landscape Ecol. 26: 851, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10980-011-9613-3.
  • Dai X.F., Jia X., Zhang W.P., Bai Y.Y., Zhang J.Y., Wang Y., Wang G.X. 2009– Plant height-crown radius and canopy coverage-density relationships determine above-ground biomass-density relationship in stressful environments – Biol. Lett. 5: 571–573.
  • Deng J.M., Wang G.X., Morris E.C., Wei X.P., Li D.X., Chen B.M., Zhao C.M., Liu J., Wang Y. 2006– Plant mass-density relationship along a moisture gradient in north-west China – J. Ecol. 94: 953–958.
  • Gao L., Bowker M.A., Xu M., Sun H., Tuo D., Zhao Y. 2017 – Biological soil crusts decrease erodibility by modifying inherent soil properties on the Loess Plateau, China – Soil Biol. Biochem. 105: 49–58.
  • Garcia V., Aranibar J., Pietrasiak N. 2015 – Multiscale effects on biological soil crusts cover and spatial distribution in the Monte Desert – Acta Oecologica, 69: 35–45.
  • Hamilton N.R.S., Matthew C Lemaire G. 1995 – In defence of the -3/2 boundary rule: a re-evaluation of self-thinning concepts and status – Ann. Bot. 76: 569–577.
  • Ji X.H., Zhang Y.M., Zhou X.B., Wu L., Zhang J. 2014 – Spatial distribution of soil properties covered by moss crusts on different scales – Acta Ecol. Sin. 34: 4006–4016.
  • Kidron G.J., Vonshak A., Abeliovich A. 2009 – Microbiotic crusts as biomarkers for surface stability and wetness duration in the Negev Desert – Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 34: 1594–1604.
  • Li X.R., Hui R., Zhao Y. 2016 – Eco-physiology of Biological Soil Crusts in Desert Regions of China – Beijing: Higher Education Press.
  • Li G., Zhang Y.M. 2014 – Interactive effects of biological soil crusts and seed appendages on seed germination of four desert species – J. Desert Res. 34: 725–731.
  • Liu G., Shi P., Xu Q., Dong X., Wang F., Wang G.G., Hui C. 2016 – Does the size-density relationship developed for bamboo species conform to the self-thinning rule? – Forest Ecol. Manag. 361: 339–345.
  • Maestre F.T., Bowker M.A., Cantón Y., Castillo-Monroy A.P., Cortina J., Escolar C., Escudero A., Lázaro R., Martínez I. 2011 – Ecology and functional roles of biological soil crusts in semi-arid ecosystems of Spain – J. Arid Environ. 75: 1282–1291.
  • McCune B., Grace J.B. 2002 – Analysis of Ecological Communities – MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
  • Ochoa-Hueso R., Hernandez R.R., Pueyo J.J., Manrique E. 2011 – Spatial distribution and physiology of biological soil crusts from semi-arid central Spain are related to soil chemistry and shrub cover – Soil Biol. Bioch. 43: 1894–1901.
  • Pietrasiak N., Johansen J.R., Drenovsky R.E. 2011 – Geologic composition influences distribution of microbiotic crusts in the Mojave and Colorado Deserts at the regional scale – Soil Biol. Bioch. 43: 967–974.
  • Ram A., Aaron Y., 2007 – Negative and positive effects of topsoil biological crusts on water availability along a rainfall gradient in a sandy arid area – CATENA, 70: 437–442.
  • Richer R., Anchassi D., El-Assaad I., El-Matbouly M., Ali F., Makki I., Metcalf J.S. 2012 – Variation in the coverage of biological soil crusts in the State of Qatar – J. Arid Environ. 78: 187–190.
  • Weber B., Büdel B., Belnap J. 2016 – Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands – Ecological Studies, 226, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30214-0_10.
  • Williams A.J., Buck B.J., Soukup D.A., Merkler D.J. 2013 – Geomorphic controls on biological soil crust distribution: A conceptual model from the Mojave Desert (USA) – Geomorphology, 195: 99–109.
  • Wu H., Franklin S.B., Liu J., Lu Z., 2017 – Relative importance of density dependence and topography on tree mortality in a subtropical mountain forest Forest – Ecol. Manag. 384: 169–179.
  • Wu L., Zhang Y.M., Zhang J., Downing A. 2015 – Precipitation intensity is the primary driver of moss crust-derived CO2 exchange: implication for soil C balance in a temperate desert of northern China – Eur. J. Soil Biol. 67: 27–34.
  • Wu L., Zhang Y.M. 2013 – Coverage estimation on biological soil crusts based on digital photos – J. Desert Res. 33: 1810–1815.
  • Xiao B., Hu K., 2017 – Moss-dominated biocrusts decrease soil moisture and result in the degradation of artificially planted shrubs under semiarid climate – Geoderma, 291: 47–54.
  • Yang W., Chen J., Zhang Y.M., Wang X.Q. 2006 – Spatial pattern of biological soil crusts and its changes in Gurbantunggut Desert during the 1970 to the 2000 – J. Nat. Resour. 21: 934–941.
  • Yin B.F., Zhang Y.M. 2016 – Physiological regulation of Syntrichia caninervis Mitt, in different microhabitats during periods of snow in the Gurbantünggüt Desert, northwestern China – J. Plant Physiol. 194: 13–22.
  • Yin B.F., Zhang Y.M., Lou A.R. 2017 – Impacts of the removal of shrubs on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of Syntrichia caninervis Mitt: in a temperate desert – Sci. Rep. 7: 45268, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45268.
  • Zar J.H. 1998 – Biostatistical Analysis – Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Zedda L., Gröngröft A., Schultz M., Petersen A., Mills A., Rambold G. 2011 – Distribution patterns of soil lichens across the principal biomes of southern Africa – J. Arid Environ. 75: 215–220.
  • Zeide B. 1987 – Analysis of the 3/2 power law of self-thinning – Forest Sci. 33: 517–537.
  • Zhang C., Lu D., Chen X., Zhang Y., Maisupova B., Tao Y. 2016 – The spatiotemporal patterns of vegetation coverage and biomass of the temperate deserts in Central Asia and their relationships with climate controls – Remote Sens. Environ. 175: 271–281.
  • Zhang J., Zhang Y., Downing A., Cheng J.H., Zhou X.B., Zhang B.C. 2009 – The influence of biological soil crusts on dew deposition in Gurbantunggut Desert, Northwestern China – J. Hydrol. 379: 220–228.
  • Zhang L.Y., Chen C.D. 2002 – On the general characteristics of plant diversity of Gurbantunggut sandy desert – Acta Ecol. Sin. 22: 1923–1932.
  • Zhang Y.M., Chen J., Wang L., Wang X.Q., Gu Z.H. 2007 – The spatial distribution patterns of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Northern Xinjiang, China – J. Arid Environ. 68: 599–610.
  • Zhang Y.M., Pan H.X., Pan B.R. 2004 – Distribution characteristics of biological crust on sand dune surface in Gurbantunggut Desert, Xinjiang – J. Soil Water Conserv. 18: 61–64.
  • Zhang Y.M., Wang H.L., Wang X.Q. 2006 – The microstructure of micro-biotic crust and its influence on wind erosion for a sandy soil surface in the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China – Geoderma, 132: 441–449
  • Zhang Y.M., Wu N., Zhang B.C., Zhang J. 2010 – Species composition, distribution patterns and ecological functions of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert – J. Arid Land, 2: 180–189.
  • Zhao Y., Li X., Zhang Z., Hu Y., Chen Y. 2014 – Biological soil crusts influence carbon release responses following rainfall in a temperate desert, northern China – Ecol. Res. 29: 889–896.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-f2ccfe59-5f32-431f-b0d6-bb8536427095
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.