Pre-treatment of fulvic acid plays a stimulant role in protection of soybean (Glycine max L.) leaves against heat and salt stress

• Autorzy: Dinler B.S. , Gunduzer E. , Tekinay T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this study was to illuminate the effects of fulvic acid in plants’ stress signaling pathway. 2.0 mg/l fulvic acid was sprayed on soybean leaves for 3 days at 12 h intervals, followed by treatment of 150 mM NaCl or exposed to heat stress at 35°C for 2 h over 2 days. Pre-treatment with fulvic acid increased the relative water content (RWC), antioxidant enzyme, isoenzyme activities (SOD, APX, GST), as well as alleviated the stress-induced oxidative damage by decreasing the levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA). In addition, the application of fulvic acid under salt stress induced rubisco expression only at 12 h, while it induced the expression of cytochrome c oxidase at 6 h and 12 h. On the other hand, fulvic acid under heat stress induced significant expression of both rubisco and cytochrome c oxidase at 6 h and 12 h. However, under high salinity conditions, fulvic acid suppressed the transcript levels of Hsp70, while it induced increases in Hsp70 levels under heat treatment at 6 h. As a result, in this study, fulvic acid played the role of a regulator and stimulant in stress response of soybean leaves.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

soybean; Glycine max; fulvic acid; stimulant; stress condition; heat stress; salt stress; regulatory mechanism; antioxidant enzyme; rubisco; cytochrome c oxidase; hsp70 gene; gene expression

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 58
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.29-41,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Dinler B.S.

• Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Sinop University, Sinop, 57000, Turkey

autor

Gunduzer E.

• Life Sciences Research and Application Center, Gazi University, Ankara, 06830, Turkey

autor

Tekinay T.

• Life Sciences Research and Application Center, Gazi University, Ankara, 06830, Turkey

Bibliografia

• AKINCI IE and ONGEL O. 2011. Nikelin fasülye (Phaseolus vulgaris) fide gelişimi üzerindeki toksisitesinin humik asit ile azaltılması. Ekoloji 20: 29–37.
• ANJUM SA, WANG L, FAROOQ M, XUE L, and ALI S. 2011. Fulvic acid application improves the maize performance under well-watered and osmotic conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197: 409–417.
• ASADA K. 1992. Ascorbate peroxidase, a hydrogen peroxidescavenging enzyme in plants. Plant Physiology 85: 235–241.
• BALIBREA ME, RUS-ALVAREZ AM, BOLARIN MC, and PEREZ-ALFOCEA F. 1997. Fast changes in soluble carbohydrates and proline contents in tomato seedlings in response to ionic and non-ionic iso-osmotic stresses. Journal of Plant Physiology 151: 221–226.
• BEAUCHAMP CO, and FRIDOVICH I. 1971. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry 44: 276–287.
• BRADFORD MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantization of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of the protein–dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248–54.
• CLAUSSEN W. 2005. Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant Science 168: 241–248.
• CRAFTS-BRANDNER SJ, and SALVUCCI ME. 2000. Rubisco activase constrains the photosynthetic potential of leaves at high temperature and CO2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97(24): 13430–13435.
• DAHAN J, TCHERKEZ G, MACHEREL D, BENAMAR A, BELCRAM K, QUADRAD M, and MIREAU H. 2014. Disruption of the cytochrome c oxidase deficient gene leads to cytochrome c oxidase depletion and reorchestrated respiratory metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 166(4): 1788–802.
• DE RONDE JA, SPREETH MH, and CRESS WA. 2000. Effect of antisense l-D1 pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase transgenic soybean plants subjected to osmotic and drought stress. Plant Growth Regulation 32: 13–26.
• DUNNET CW. 1955. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50: 1096–1121.
• FERNANDES AN, GIACOMELLI C, GIOVANELA M, VAZ DO, SZPOGANICZ B, and SIERRA MMD. 2009. Potentiometric acidity determination in humic substances influenced by different analytical procedures. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 20: 1715–1723.
• FLORES MIA, ROMERO-GONZALEZ R, FRENICH AG, and VIDAL JLM. 2011. QuEChERS-based extraction procedure for multifamily analysis of phytohormones in vegetables by UHPLC-MS/MS. Journal of Seperation Science 34: 1517–1524.
• GARCIA AC, SANTOS LA, IZQUIERDO FG, RUMJANEK VM, CASTRO RN, SOARES DOS SANTOS F, DE SOUZA LGA, BERBARA RLL. 2014. Potentialities of vermicompost humic acids to alleviate water stress in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Geochemical Exploration 136: 48–54.
• GEZGIN S, DURSUN N, and YILMAZ G. 2012. Bitki Yetiştiriciliğinde humik ve fulvik asit kaynağı olan Tki-huma kullanımı. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Dergisi. 159–163.
• GOATLEY JM, and SCHMIDT RE. 1990. Seedling kentucky bluegrass growth response to chelated iron and biostimulator materials. Agronomy Journal 82: 901–905.
• GRENTHE I, and PUIGDOMENECH I. 1997. Modelling in Aquatic Chemistry, Paris, Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD.
• HARTL FU. 1996. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 381: 571–580.
• HABIG WH, PABST MJ, and JAKOBY WB. 1974. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 249: 7130–7139.
• HU X, LIU R, LI Y, WANG W, TAI F, XUE R, and LI C. 2010. Heat shock protein 70 regulates the abscisic acid-induced antioxidant response of maize to combined drought and heat stress. Plant Growth Regulation 60: 225–235.
• JOHNSON CM, and ULRICH A. 1959. II. Analytical methods for use in plant analysis. California Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 766: 30–33.
• KESBA HH, and EL-BELTAGII HS. 2012. Biochemical changes in grape rootstocks resulted from humic acid treatments in relation to nematode infection. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 2: 287–293.
• KUZNETSOV VV, and SHEVYAKOVA NI. 1997. Stress responses of tobacco cells to high temperature and salinity. Proline accumulation and phosphorylation of polypeptides. Physiologia Plantarum 100: 320–326.
• LAEMMLI UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–685.
• LIBAULT M, THIBIVILLIERS S, BILGIN DD, RADWAN O, BENITEZ M, CLOUGH SJ, and STACEY G. 2008. Identification of four soybean reference genes for gene expression normalization. The Plant Genome 1(1): 44–54.
• LIVAK JK, and SCHMITTGEN DT. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real- Time Quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4): 402–408.
• MADHAVA RAO KV, and SRESTY TV. 2000. Antioxidative parameters in the seedlings of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh) in response to Zn and Ni stresses. Plant Science 157: 113–128.
• MATHIS WT. 1956. Report on the flame photometric determination of potassium and sodium in plant tissue. Journal of AOAC International 39: 419.
• MAYHEW L. 2004. Humic substances in biological agriculture, Part 1. In Acres U.S.A. Fred C. Walters, Austin, Texas, p. 34.
• MELONI DA, OLIVA MA, MARTINEZ CA, and CAMBRAIA J . 2003. Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 49: 69–76.
• MITTLER R, and ZILINSKAS BA. 1993. Detection of ascorbate peroxidase activity in native gels by inhibition of the ascorbate dependent reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium. Analytical Biochemistry 212: 540–546.
• MORARD P, EYHERAGUIBEL B, MORARD M, and SILVESTRE J. 2010. Direct effects of humic-like substance on growth, water and mineral nutrition of various species. Journal of Plant Nutrition 34: 46–59.
• NAKANO Y, and ASADA K. 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology 22: 867–880.
• NANDWAL AS, HOODA A, and DATTA D. 1998. Effect of substrate moisture and potassium on water relations and C, N and K distribution in Vigna radiata. Biologia Plantarum 41: 149–153.
• NAVARI-IZZO F, QUARTACCI MF, PINZINO C, DALLA VECCHIA F, and SGHERRI CLM. 1998. Thylakoid-bound and stromal antioxidative enzymes in wheat treated with excess copper. Physiologia Plantarum 104: 630–638.
• RICCI G, BELLO ML, CACCURI AM, GALIAZZO F, and FEDERICI G. 1984. Detection of glutathione transferase activity on polyacrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry 143: 226–230.
• ROSCOE JT. 1975. Fundemental research statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. 63.
• SHAHID M, DUMAT C, SILVESTRE J, and PINELLI E. 2012. Effect of fulvic acids on lead-induced oxidative stress to metal sensitive Vicia faba L. Biology and Fertility of Soils 48: 689–697.
• SHEEHAN D, MEADE G, FOLEY VM, and DOWD CA. 2001. Structure, function and evolution of glutathione transferases, implications for classification of non-mammalian members of an ancient enzyme superfamily. Biochemical Journal 360: 1–16.
• SIVAKUMAR P, SHARMILA P, and PARDHA SARADHı P. 2000. Proline alleviates salt-stress-induced enhancement in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate oxygenase activity. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 279: 512–515.
• SMART RE, and BINGHAM GE. 1974. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology 53: 258–260.
• STEVENSON FJ. 1994. Humus Chemistry, Genesis, Composition, Reactions, New York, Wiley.
• TOKYO J, LEE DH, KIM YS, and LEE CB. 2001. The inductive responses of the antioxidant enzymes by salt stress in the rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Plant Physiology 15: 737–745.
• VELIKOVA V, YORDANOV I, and EDEREVA A. 2000. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants. Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Science 151: 59–66.
• WANG W, VINOCUR B, SHOSEYOV O, and ALTMAN A. 2004. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends in Plant Science 9(5): 244–252.
• XUDAN X. 1986. The effect of foliar application of fulvic acid on water use, nutrient uptake and wheat yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 37: 343–350.
• YULING C, MIN C, YUN YL, and XIE Z. 2000. Effect of fulvic acid on ABA, IAA and activities of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase in winter wheat seedling under drought conditions. Plant Physiology 36: 311–314.
• ZHANG J, JIA W, YANG J, and ISMAIL AM. 2006. Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Field Crops Research. 97: 111–119.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/abcsb-2016-000