Spatial variability more influential than soil pH and land relief on thermophilous vegetation in overgrown coppice oak forest

• Autorzy: Szymura T.H. , Szymura M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 82
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.5-11,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Szymura T.H.

• Department of Ecology, Biogeochemistry and Environmental Protection, University of Wroclaw, Kanonia6/8, 50-328 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Szymura M.

• Department of Agroecosystems and Green Areas Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl.Grunwaldzki 24a, 53-363 Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Bürgi M. Habitat alterations caused by long-term changes in forest use in northeastern Switzerland. In: Kirby KJ, Watkins C, editors. The ecological history of European forest. Oxford: CAB International; 1998. p. 203–211.
• 2. Wohlgemuth T, Bürgi M, Scheidegger C, Schütz M. Dominance reduction of species through disturbance – a proposed management principle for central European forests. For Ecol Manage. 2002;166(1–3):1–15. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00662-4
• 3. Jakubowska-Gabara J. Decline of Potentillo albae-Quercetum Libb. 1933 phytocoenoses in Poland. Vegetatio. 1996;124(1):45–59. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/BF00045143
• 4. Roleček J. Vegetation types of dry-mesic oak forests in Slovakia. Preslia. 2005;77(3):241–261.
• 5. Hédl R, Kopecký M, Komárek J. Half a century of succession in a temperate oakwood: from species-rich community to mesic forest. Divers Distrib. 2010;16(2):267–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00637.x
• 6. Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F, Alard D, Saguez R, Wattez-Franger A, et al. Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: understorey response to two silvicultural systems. J Appl Ecol. 2004;41(6):1065–1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00960.x
• 7. Müller SW, Rusterholz HP, Baur B. Effects of forestry practices on relict plant species on limestone cliffs in the northern Swiss Jura mountains. For Ecol Manage. 2006;237(1–3):227–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. foreco.2006.09.048
• 8. van Calster H, Baeten L, Verheyen K, De Keersmaeker L, Dekeyser S, Rogister JE, et al. Diverging effects of overstorey conversion scenarios on the understorey vegetation in a former coppice-with-standards forest. For Ecol Manage. 2008;256(4):519–528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. foreco.2008.04.042
• 9. Baeten L, Bauwens B, De Schrijver A, De Keersmaeker L, van Calster H, Vandekerkhove K, et al. Herb layer changes (1954–2000) related to the conversion of coppice-with-standards forest and soil acidification. Appl Veg Sci. 2009;12(2):187–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2009.01013.x
• 10. Szymura TH. Tradycyjna gospodarka odroślowa w Europie Środkowej i jej wpływ na różnorodność biologiczną. Sylwan. 2010;154(8):545–551.
• 11. Kwiatkowski P. Zbiorowiska leśne Pogórza Złotoryjskiego. Fragm Flor Geobot Polonica. 2001;8:178–218.
• 12. Kwiatkowski P. Podgórska ciepłolubna dąbrowa brekiniowa Sorbo torminalis-Quercetum na Pogórzu Złotoryjskim. Fragm Flor Geobot Polonica. 2003;10:175–193.
• 13. Paczoski J. Dąbrowy Białowieży. Przegląd Leśniczy. 1926;11:517–529.
• 14. Domin K. The plant associations of the valley of Radotin. Preslia. 1928;7:3–68.
• 15. Klika J. Geobotanicki studie rostlinných společenstev Velké Hory u Karlštejna. Rozpr České Akad Vĕd. 1928;37(12):1–42.
• 16. Ellenberg HH. Vegetation ecology of central Europe. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
• 17. Szczęśniak E. Szata roślinna północno-zachodniej części Pogórza Wałbrzyskiego. II. Zbiorowiska leśne. Acta Uni Wrat Prace Bot. 1999;73:83–113.
• 18. Berdowski W, Panek E. Roślinność rezerwatu “Góra Radunia” w województwie wrocławskim. Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody. 1999;18(2):3–13.
• 19. Holeksa J, Woźniak G. Biased vegetation patterns and detection of vegetation changes using phytosociological databases. A case study in the forests of the Babia Góra National Park (the West Carpathians, Poland). Phytocoenologia. 2005;35(1):1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0340-269X/2005/0035-0001
• 20. Hédl R. Is sampling subjectivity a distorting factor in surveys for vegetation diversity? Folia Geobot. 2007;42(2):191–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ BF02893885
• 21. Michalcová D, Lvončík S, Chytrý M, Hájek O. Bias in vegetation databases? A comparison of stratified-random and preferential sampling. J Veg Sci. 2011;22(2):281–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01249.x
• 22. Hubbell SP. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001.
• 23. Szymura TH, Szymura M. Soil properties and light availability determine species richness and vegetation diversity in an overgrown coppice oak stand. Polish J Ecol. 2011;59(3):523–533.
• 24. Zelný D, Chytrý M. Environmental control of the vegetation pattern in deep river valleys of the Bohemian Massif. Preslia. 2007;79:205–222.
• 25. Szymura TH. How does recent vegetation reflect previous systems of forest management? Polish J Ecol. 2012;60(4):859–862.
• 26. Chytrý M, Otýpková Z. Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation. J Veg Sci. 2003;14(4):563–570. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02183.x
• 27. Mirek Z, Piękoś-Mirkowa H, Zając A, Zając M. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland a checklist. In: Mirek Z, editor. Biodiversity of Poland. Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2002. (vol 1).
• 28. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Werner W, Paulißen D. Zeigerwerte der Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr Geobot. 1992;18:1–258.
• 29. Persson S. Ecological indicator values as an aid in the interpretation of ordination diagrams. J Ecol. 1981;69(1):71. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2259816
• 30. Tichý L. Juice (version 6.4.59). Brno: Masaryk University; 2007.
• 31. Matuszkiewicz W. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers PWN; 2006.
• 32. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM. An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
• 33. Legendre P, Legendre LFJ. Numerical ecology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998.
• 34. Tichý L. New similarity indices for the assignment of relevés to the vegetation units of an existing phytosociological classification. Plant Ecol. 2005;179(1):67–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-004-5798-8
• 35. McCune B, Keon D. Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. J Veg Sci. 2002;13(4):603–606. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02087.x
• 36. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology. 1992;73(3):1045. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/1940179
• 37. ter Braak CJF, Prentice IC. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv Ecol Res. 2004;34:235–282.
• 38. Kącki Z, Śliwiński M. The Polish Vegetation Database: structure, resources and development. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2012;81(2):75–79. http://dx.doi. org/10.5586/asbp.2012.014
• 39. Zobel M. The relative of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends Ecol Evol. 1997;12(7):266–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01096-3
• 40. Ehrlen J, Eriksson O. Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology. 2000;81(6):1667. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/177315
• 41. Vondrák J, Prach K. Occurrence of heliophilous species on isolated rocky outcrops in a forested landscape: relict species or recent arrivals. Preslia. 2006;78:115–121.
• 42. Honnay O, Jacquemyn H, Bossuyt B, Hermy M. Forest fragmentation effects on patch occupancy and population viability of herbaceous plant species. New Phytol. 2005;166(3):723–736. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01352.x