PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2013 | 58 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Flea burden and its influence on nest selection and use in Dryomys nitedula Pallas, 1778

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Since dormice usually use natural tree hollows or artificial nest boxes as nest sites and these nests are reused from 1 year to another, the present study investigated how the parasite loads from old nests affected the behaviour of the forest dormouse Dryomys nitedula Pallas, 1778. Dormice were subjected to three different experiments: 1. They were given the choice of a nest box infected with ectoparasites and a new unused nest box; 2. Dormice were given the choice of a treated (uninfected) previously used nest boxes and previously used nest box that was infected; and 3. Using infrared motion sensor cameras, we tested weather they preferred to avoid nest boxes when only infected nests were available. The results revealed that the females with pups are pickier when choosing the nursery site. These preferred empty nest boxes or nest boxes with treated nests instead of the infested ones. However, non-breeding adults and sub-adults showed indifference to the flea infestation of the nest.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

58

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.419-423,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Biology, Faculty of Chemistry-Biology-Geography, West University of Timisoara, Pestalozzi no. 16 Street, Timisoara 300115, Romania

Bibliografia

  • Adamík P, Král M (2008) Nest losses of cavity nesting birds caused by dormice (Gliridae, Rodentia). Acta Theriologica 53(2):185–192
  • Bertolino S, Cordero di Montezemolo N (2007) Garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus) nest site selection in an alpine habitat. Ethol Ecol Evol 19:51–60
  • Christe P, Oppliger A, Richner H (1994) Ectoparasite affects choice and use of roost sites in the great tit, Parus major. Anim Behav 47:895–898
  • Czeszczewik D, Walankiewicz W, Stanska M (2008) Small mammals in nests of cavity–nesting birds: why should ornithologists study rodents? Can J Zool 86(4):286–293
  • Doniță N, Popescu A, Paucă-Comănescu M, Mihailescu S, Biriș IA (2005) Habitatele din România. Editura Tehnică Silvică, București 1-496 + 56.
  • Duma I, Giurgiu S (2012) Circadian activity and nest use of Dryomys nitedula as revealed by infrared motion sensor cameras. Folia Zoologica 61(1):49–53
  • Fitze PS, Tschirren B, Richner H (2004) Life history and fitness consequences of ectoparasites. J Anim Ecol 73(2):216–226
  • Gatter W, Schütt R (1999) Langzeitentwicklung der höhleonkonkurenz zwischen vogel (Aves) und säugetieren (bilche Gliridae; mäuse Muridae) in den wäldern Baden-Württembergs. Ornitologischer Anzeiger 38:107–130
  • Giorgi MS, Arlettaz R, Christe P, Vogel P (2001) The energetic grooming costs imposed by a parasitic mite (Spinturnix myoti) upon its bat host (Myotis myotis). Procedings Roy Soc B 268:2071–2075
  • Griffith SC, Pryke SR, Mariette M (2008) Use of nest boxes by the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata): implications for reproductive success and research. EMU 108(4):311–319
  • Harrison A, Scantlebury M, Montgomery WI (2010) Body mass and sex-biased parasitism in wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. Oikos 119:1099–1104
  • Hawlena H, Abramsky Z, Krasnov BR (2006a) Ectoparasites and age-dependent survival in a desert rodent. Oecologia 148(1):30–39
  • Hawlena H, Khokhlova IS, Abramsky Z, Krasnov BR (2006b) Age, intensity of infestation by flea parasites and body mass loss in a rodent host. Parasitology 133:187–193
  • Hillegass MA, Waterman JM, Roth JD (2010) Parasite removal increases reproductive success in a social African ground squirrel. Behav Ecol 21(4):696–700
  • Juškaitis R (2008) The common dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius: ecology, population structure and dynamics. Institute of Ecology of Vilnius University Publishers, Vilnius
  • Juškaitis R (2006a) Nest box grids in population studies of the common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius L.) methodological aspects. Pol J Ecol 54(3):351–358
  • Juškaitis R (2006b) Interactions between dormice (Gliridae) and hole-nesting birds in nest boxes. Folia Zoologica 55(3):225–236
  • Kam M, Degen AA, Khokhlova IS, Krasnov BR, Geffen E (2010) Do fleas affect energy expenditure of their free-living hosts? PlosOne 5(10):e13686
  • Khokhlova IS, Krasnov BR, Kam M, Burdelova NI, Degen AA (2002) Energy cost of ectoparasitism: the flea Xenopsylla ramesis on the desert gerbil Gerbillus dasyurus. Journal of Zoology 258:349–354
  • Lehmann T (1993) Ectoparasites: direct impact on host fitness. Parasitology Today 9(1):8–13
  • Lehmann T (1992) Ectoparasite impacts on Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi under natural conditions. Parasitology 104:479–488
  • Merino A, Potti J (1995) Pied flycatchers prefer to nest in clean nest boxes in an area with detrimental nest ectoparasites. Condor 97:828–831
  • Millar JS (1978) Energetics of reproduction in Peromyscus leucopus: the cost of lactation. Ecology 59(5):1055–1061
  • Morris PA, Bright PW, Woods D (1990) Use of nest boxes by the dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius. Biol Conserv 51:1–13
  • Opplinger A, Richner H, Christe P (1994) Effect of an ectoparasite on lay date, nest-site choice, desertion, and hatching success in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol 5:130–134
  • Richner H, Tripet F (1999) Ectoparasitism and the trade-off between current and future reproduction. Oikos 86(3):535–538
  • Ściński M, Borowski Z (2006) Home ranges, nest sites and population dynamics of the forest dormouse Dryomys nitedula (Pallas) in an Oak-Hornbeam forest: a live-trapping and radio-tracking study. Pol J Ecol 54:391–396
  • Sikes RS (1995) Costs of lactation and optimal litter size in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster). J Mammal 76(2):348–357
  • Stanback MT, Dervan AA (2001) Within-season nest-site fidelity in eastern bluebirds: disentangling effects of nest success and parasite avoidance. Auk 118(3):743–745
  • Tomás G, Merino S, Moreno J, Moreales J (2007) Consequences of nest use for parasite burden and female health and condition in blue tits, Cyanistes caeruleus. Anim Behav 73:805–814
  • Tripet F, Richner H (1997) Host responses to ectoparasites: food compensation by parent blue tits. Oikos 78:557–561
  • van Vuren D (1996) Ectoparasites, fitness, and social behaviour of yellow-bellied marmots. Ethology 102:686–694
  • Zaytseva H (2006) Nest material of the common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius L.) used in nest boxes, Podilla (West Ukraine). Pol J Ecol 54(3):397–401

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-ed970590-cec6-46c0-bf6c-5673cf37d05e
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.