PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2013 | 72 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Effect of light-dark changes on the locomotor activity in open field in adult rats and opossums

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
There have been no reports on how the light-dark changes determine the locomotor activity of animals in the group of high reactivity (HR) and low reactivity (LR). In the present study we have compared selected parameters of the locomotor activity of the HR and the LR groups of the laboratory opossums and Wistar rats during consecutive, light and dark phases in the open field test. Sixty male Wistar adult rats, at an average weight of 350 g each, and 24 adult Monodelphis opossums of both sexes at an average weight of 120 g each were used. The animals’ activity for 2 h daily between the hours of 17:30 and 19:30, in line with the natural light-dark cycle were recorded and then analysed using VideoTrack ver. 2.0 (Vievpoint France). According to our results, we noted that a change of the experimental conditions from light to dark involves an increase in the locomotor activity in rats and opossums of the HR group, while there is no effect on the activity of the rats and opossums in the LR group. Locomotor activity in the HR rats, both in the light and dark conditions is characterised by a consistent pattern of change — higher activity in the first stage of the recording and a slowdown (habituation) in the second phase of the observation. The locomotor activity of the opossum, during both light and dark conditions, was observed to be at a consistently high level compared to the rats. (Folia Morphol 2013; 72, 4: 300–305)

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

72

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.300-305,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 1, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland
  • Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 1, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland
autor
  • Department of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Barker DJ, Sanabria F, Lasswell A, Thrailkill EA, Pawlak AP, Killeen PR (2010) Brief light as a practical aversive stimulus for the albino rat. Behav Brain Res, 214: 402–408.
  • 2. Beardslee SL, Papadakis E, Altman HJ, Harrington GM, Commissaris RL (1989) Defensive burying behavior in maudsley reactive (MR/Har) and nonreactive (MNRA/Har) rats. Physiol Behav, 45: 449–451.
  • 3. Blanchard MM, Mendelsohn D, Stamp JA (2009) The HR/LR model: Further evidence as an animal model of sensation seeking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 33: 1145–1154.
  • 4. Cambras T, Vilaplana J, Campuzano A, Canal-Corretger MM, Carulla M, Díez-Noguera A (2000) Entrainment of the rat motor activity rhythm: effects of the light-dark cycle and physical exercise. Physiol Behav, 70: 227–232.
  • 5. Challet E (2007) Minireview: Entrainment of the suprachiasmatic clockwork in diurnal and nocturnal mammals. Endocrinology, 148: 5648–5655.
  • 6. Dubovicky M, Jezova D (2004) Effect of chronic emotional stress on habituation processes in open field in adult rats. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1018: 199–206.
  • 7. Fadem BH, Corbetta A (1997) Sex Differences and the Development of Social Behavior in a Marsupial, the Gray Short-Tailed Opossum (Monodelphis Domestica). Physiol Behav, 61: 857–861.
  • 8. Fuss J, Ben Abdallah NM, Hensley FW, Weber KJ, Hellweg R, Gass P (2010) Deletion of running-induced hippocampal neurogenesis by irradiation prevents development of an anxious phenotype in mice. PLoS ONE, 5.
  • 9. Geyer MA, Russo PV, Masten VL (1986) Multivariate assessment of locomotor behavior: pharmacological and behavioral analyses. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 25: 277–288.
  • 10. Kabbaj M (2004) Neurobiological Bases of Individual Differences in Emotional and Stress Responsiveness. Arch Neurol, 61: 1009–1012.
  • 11. Kabbaj M, Akil H (2001) Individual differences in novelty-seeking behavior in rats: a c-fos study. Neuroscience, 106: 535–545.
  • 12. Kalynchuk LE, Gregus A, Boudreau D, Perrot-Sinal TS (2004) Corticosterone increases depression-like behavior, with some effects on predator odor-induced defensive behavior, in male and female rats. Behav Neurosci, 118: 1365–77.
  • 13. Klejbor I, Turlejski K (2012) Different strategies of exploration and phenotypic variability of the locomotor behavior in new environment: Comparative study of the laboratory opossum (Monodelphis domestica) and Wistar rat (Rattus norvegicus). Acta Neurobiol Exp, 72: 452–460.
  • 14. Marinelli M (2005) The many facets of the locomotor response to a novel environment test: theoretical comment on mitchell, cunningham, and mark. Behav Neurosci, 119: 1144–1151.
  • 15. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science, 245: 1511–1513.
  • 16. Piazza PV, Le Moal ML (1996) Pathophysiological basis of vulnerability to drug abuse: role of an interaction between stress, glucocorticoids, and dopaminergic neurons. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 36: 359–378.
  • 17. Pisula W, Turlejski K, Stryjek R, Nałęcz-Tolaka A, Grabiec M, Djavadian RL (2012) Response to novelty in the laboratory Wistar rat, wild-captive WWCPS rat, and the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). Behav Proc, 91: 145–151.
  • 18. Prut L, Belzung C (2003) The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. Eur J Pharmacol, 463: 3–33.
  • 19. Sarkisova KY, Kulikov MA (2001) Prophylactic actions of the antioxidant agent AEKOL on behavioral (psychoemotional) disturbances induced by chronic stress in rats. Neurosci Behav Physiol, 31: 503–508.
  • 20. Stryjek R, Modlińska K, Turlejski K, Pisula W (2013) Circadian Rhythm of Outside-Nest Activity in Wild (WWCPS), Albino and Pigmented Laboratory Rats. PLoS ONE, 8.
  • 21. Treit D, Fundytus M (1988) Thigmotaxis as a test for anxiolytic activity in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 31: 959–962.
  • 22. Valle FP (1970) Effects of strain, sex, and illumination on open-field behavior of rats. Am J Psychol, 83: 103–111.
  • 23. Van Gaalen MM, Steckler T (2000) Behavioural analysis of four mouse strains in an anxiety test battery. Behav Brain Res, 115: 95–106.
  • 24. Vianna MR, Alonso M, Viola H, Quevedo J, de Paris F, Furman M, de Stein ML, Medina JH, Izquierdo I (2000) Role of hippocampal signaling pathways in long-term memory formation of a nonassociative learning task in the rat. Learn Mem, 7: 333–340.
  • 25. Węsierska M (2002) Specyfika zachowań eksploracyjnych oposa (Monodelphis domestica) i szczura (Rattus norvegicus) odmiany Long-Evans. Kosmos, 51: 19–33.
  • 26. Węsierska M, Turlejski K (2000) Spontaneous behavior of the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) in the elevated plus-maze: comparison with Long-Evans rats. Acta Neurobiol Exp, 60: 479–487.
  • 27. Węsierska M, Walasek G, Kilijanek J, Djavadian RL, Turlejski K (2003) Behavior of the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) in the open field and in response to a new object, in comparison with the rat. Behav Brain Res, 143: 31–40.
  • 28. Wideman C, Murphy H (2009) Constant light induces alterations in melatonin levels, food intake, feed efficiency, visceral adiposity, and circadian rhythms in rats. Nutr Neurosci, 12: 233–240.
  • 29. Yan J, Wang H, Liu Y, Shao C (2008) Analysis of gene regulatory networks in the mammalian circadian rhythm. PLoS Comput Biol, 4.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-ec74cdfb-b867-42ac-bf14-7d55d1c6bfa2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.