Nowe trendy w przetwórstwie mięsa wieprzowego a preferencje konsumenckie

• Autorzy: Guzek D. , Blabska D. , Wierzbicka A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

New trends in pork and pork products processing in relation to consumer preferences

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule omówione zostały różne aspekty nowoczesnych metod przetwarzania wieprzowiny, technologii opakowalniczych, substancji dodatkowych, w tym zwłaszcza rozwiązań zwiększających wartość prozdrowotną i funkcjonalną produktów z mięsa wieprzowego. Obecnie obserwowane są dynamiczne zmiany związane z wykorzystaniem nowych technologii produkcji, nowych substancji dodatkowych (w tym również dodatków o charakterze bioaktywnym), czy nowych technologii opakowalni­czych w celu uzyskania mięsa -wieprzowego oraz jego przetworów o -wysokiej, powtarzalnej jakości, spełniających oczekiwania konsumenta.

EN

The aim of the presented analysis was to indicate the most important aspects of consumer attitudes and expectations associated with pork and pork functional products. Vari­ous aspects of modern food processing methods, packaging technologies and additives, especially solutions improving health-promoting and functional value of pork products are also presented. Dynamic changes associated with using new technologies of production, new additives (inter alia bioactive additives) and new packaging technologies, in order to obtain pork and pork products characterized by high and repeatable quality, that may satisfy needs of consumers, are observed. The main trends in pork and pork products pro­cessing and production, that satisfy mentioned criteria, are lower fat percentage, higher long-chain unsaturated fatty acids percentage and including health-promoting compo­nents.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Techniki Przetwórstwa Spożywczego
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 21
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: s.92-96,rys.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Guzek D.

• Wydział Nauk o Żywieniu Człowieka i Konsumpcji, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa

autor

Blabska D.

• Wydział Nauk o Żywieniu Człowieka i Konsumpcji, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa

autor

Wierzbicka A.

• Wydział Nauk o Żywieniu Człowieka i Konsumpcji, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warszawa

Bibliografia

• [1] Ahvenainen R. (Ed.) 2003. Novel food packaging techniques. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
• [2] Aymerich M.T., Garriga M., Costa, S. Monfort J.M., Hugas M. 2002. Prevention of ropiness in cooked pork by bacteriocinogenic cultures. International Dairy Journal, 1(12), 239-246.
• [3] Aymerich T., Picouet P.A., Monfort J.M. 2008. Decontamination technologies for meat products. Meat Science, 78, 114-129.
• [4] Ayo J., Carballo J., Serrano J., Olmedilla-Alonso B., Ruiz-Capillas C., Jiménez-Colmenero F. 2007. Effect of total replacement of pork backfat with walnut on the nutritional profile of frankfurters. Meat Science, 77(2), 173-181.
• [5] Bonneau M., Lebret B. 2010. Production systems and influence on eating quality of pork. Meat Science, 84(2), 293-300.
• [6] Brewer S. 2004. Irradiation effects on meat color — a review. Meat Science, 68, 1-17.
• [7] Carpenter R., O'grady M.N., O'callaghan Y.C., O' brien N.M., Kerry J.P. 2007. Evaluation of the antioxidant potential of grape seed and bearberry extracts in raw and cooked pork. Meat Science, 76(4), 604-610.
• [8] Carrasco A., Tárrega, R., Ramírez M. R., Min- goarranz F. J., Cava R. 2005. Colour and lipid oxidation changes in dry-cured loins from free-range reared and intensively reared pigs as affected by ionizing radiation dose level. Meat Science, 69, 609-615.
• [9] Champredonde M. 2008. The source and market development of a premium Product - Beef From The Argentine Pampas. Meat Science, 79(3), 534-540.
• [10] Chen M.T., Guo H.L., Tseng T.F., Roan S.W., Ngapo T.M. 2010. Consumer choice of pork chops in taiwan. Meat Science, 85(3), 555-559.
• [11] Choi Y.-S., Choi J.-H., Han D.-J., Kim H.-Y., Lee M.-A., Kim H.-W., Jeong J.-Y, Kim C.-J. 2009. Char­acteristics of low-fat meat emulsion systems with pork fat replaced by vegetable oils and rice branfiber. Meat Science, 82(2), 266-271.
• [12] Coma V. 2008. Bioactive packaging technologies for extended shelf life of meat-based products. Meat Sci­ence, 78, 90-103.
• [13] Cutter C.N. 2006 opportunities for bio-based pa­ckaging technologies to improve the quality and safety of fresh and further processed muscle foods. Meat Science, 74(1), 131-142.
• [14] Day L., Seymour R.B., Pitts K.F., Konczak I., Lun- din L. 2009. Incorporation of functional ingredients into foods. Trends In Food Science & Technology, 20, 388-395.
• [15] Decker E. A, Park Y. 2010. Healthier meat products as functional foods. Meat Science, 86(1), 49-55.
• [16] Eilamo M., Ahvenainen R., Hurm, E., Heinio, R. L., Mattila-Sandholm T. 1995. The effect of package leakage on the shelf-life of modified atmosphere packed minced meat steaks and its detection. Lebensmittel­Wissenschaft Und Technologie, 28. 62-71.
• [17] Grunert K. G., Verbeke W., Kügler J. O., Saeed F., Scholderer J. 2011. Use of consumer insight in the new product development process in the meat sector. Meat Science, In Press, Corrected Proof, Doi:10.1016/J. Meatsci.2011.04.02.
• [18] Grunert K.G. 2006. Future trends and consumer life­styles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Science, 74, 149-160.
• [19] Grunert K.G., Bredahl L., Brunso K. 2004. Con­sumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector - a review. Meat Science, 66 (2), 259-272.
• [20] Hugas M., Garriga M., Monfort J. M. 2002. New mild technologies in meat processing: high pressure as a model technology. Meat Science, 62, 359-371.
• [21] Hugas M., Pages F., Garriga M., Monfort J. M. 1998. Application of the bacteriocinogenic lactobaci lus sakei ctc494 to prevent growth of listeria in fresh and cooked meat products packed with different atmo­spheres. Food Microbiology, 15, 639-650.
• [22] Kerry J.P., O'grady M.N., Hogan S.A. 2006. Past, current and potential utilisation of active and intel­ligent packaging systems for meat and muscle-based products: a review. Meat Science, 74, 113-130.
• [23] Mattila K., Saris P., Tyopponen S. 2003. Survival of listeria monocytogenes on sliced cooked sausage after treatment with pediocin ach. International Journal Of Food Microbiology, 89, 281-286.
• [24] Nan K.C., Ko K.Y., Min B.R., Ismail H., Lee E.J., Cordray J., Ahn D.U. 2007. Effects of oleoresinto- copherol combination on lipid oxidation, off-odor and color of irradiated raw and cooked pork patties. Meat Science, 75, 61-70.
• [25] Nicolalde C., Stetzer A.J., Tucker E.M., Mckeith F.K., Brewer M.S. 2006. Antioxidant and modified atmosphere packaging prevention of discoloration in pork bones during retail display. Meat Science, 72, 713­-718.
• [26] Randell K., Ahvenainen R., Latva-Kala K., Hurme E., Mattila-Sandholm T., Hyvonen L. 1995. Modi­fied atmosphere-packed marinated chicken breast and rainbow trout quality as affected by package leakage. Journal ofFood Science, 60, 667-672.
• [27] Resurrección A.V.A. 2004. Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meat products. Meat Science, 66(1), 11-20.
• [28] Ruusunen M., Puolanne E. 2005. Review: Reducing Sodium Intake From Meat Products. Meat Science, 70(3), 531-541.
• [29] Sebranek J.G., Bacus J.N. 2007. Cured meat products without direct addition of nitrate or nitrite: What are the issues? Meat Science, 77(1), 136-147.
• [30] Sheard P.R., Enser M., Wood J.D., Nute G.R., Gill B.P., Richardson R.I. 2000. Shelf Life And Quality Of Pork And Pork Products With Raised N-3 Pufa. Meat Science, 55(2), 213-221.
• [31] Sorenson D., Henchion M., Marcos B., Ward P., Mullen A.M., Allen P. 2011. Consumer acceptance of high pressure processed beef-based chilled rea­dy meals: The mediating role of food-related lifestyle factors. Meat Science, 87(1), 81-87.
• [32] Vandendriessche F. 2008. Meat products in the past, today and in the future. Meat Science, 78, 104-113.
• [33] Verbeke W., Pérez-Cueto F.J.A., De Barcellos M.D., Krystallis A.K., Grunert K.G. 2010. Euro­pean citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef andpork. Meat Science, 84, 284-292.
• [34] Wicklund R.A., Paulson D.D., Tucker E.M., Stet­zer A.J., Desantos F., Rojas M., Macfarlane B.J., Brewer M.S. 2006. Effect of carbon monoxide and high oxygen modified atmosphere packaging and phos­phate enhanced, case-ready pork chops. Meat Science, 74, 704-709.
• [35] Wilkinson B.H.P., Janz J.A.M., Morel P.C.H., Purchas R.W., Hendriks W.H. 2006. The effect of modified atmosphere packaging with carbon monoxide on the storage quality of master-packaged fresh pork. Meat Science, 73, 605-610.
• [36] Zhang W., Xiao S., Samaraweera H., Lee E. J., Ahn D.U. 2010. Improving functional value of meat prod­ucts. Meat Science, 86(1), 15-31.

Uwagi

Rekord w opracowaniu