A morphological study of the medial and lateral femoral circumflex arteries: a proposed new classification

• Autorzy: Labetowicz P. , Olewnik L. , Podgorski M. , Majos M. , Stefanczyk L. , Topol M. , Polguj M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: Confirming the branching pattern of the deep femoral artery (DFA) is vital in planning radiological and surgical procedures involving the medial circumflex femoral artery (MFCA) and the lateral circumflex artery (LFCA). The aim of this study was to characterise the course and morphology of branches of the DFA. Materials and methods: The anatomical dissection included 80 lower limbs which were fixed in 10% formalin solution. A dissection of the femoral region was carried out according to a pre-established protocol, using traditional techniques. Morphometric measurements were obtained twice by two researchers. Results: Six types of medial and lateral femoral circumflex artery variations were distinguished. In type I, the DFA divides into the MFCA and the LFCA (observed in 45% of cases). In type II, the MFCA is absent and the LFCA origin normally from the DFA (18.75%). In type III, the MFCA arises from the femoral artery above the origin of the DFA, while the LFCA starts from the DFA (15%). Finally, in type IV, the LFCA arises from the femoral artery above the origin of the DFA, while the MFCA starts from the DFA (10%). In type V, the LFCA origin alone from the femoral artery below the origin of the DFA, while the MFCA origin from the DFA (7.5%), while in type VI (3.75%), both the MFCA and the LFCA origin from the femoral artery. The mean diameter of the femoral artery at the level of the DFA origin was greatest in type 2 (10.62 ± 2.07 mm) and the least in type 6 (7.90 ± 1.72 mm; p = 0.0317). The distance from inguinal ligament to where the DFA arose was the greatest in type 6 (78.24 ± 29.74 mm) and least in type 5 (28.85 ± 11.72 mm; p = 0.0529). Conclusions: The medial and lateral femoral circumflex arteries were characterised by high morphological variations. The diameter of the femoral artery at the level of inguinal ligament correlated with the diameter of the DFA and distance to where the DFA arises from femoral artery. (Folia Morphol 2019; 78, 4: 738–745)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 78
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.738-745,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Labetowicz P.

• Department of Normal and Clinical Anatomy, Chair of Anatomy and Histology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland

autor

Olewnik L.

• Department of Normal and Clinical Anatomy, Chair of Anatomy and Histology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland

autor

Podgorski M.

• Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland

autor

Majos M.

• Department of Radiology, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

autor

Stefanczyk L.

• Department of Radiology, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

autor

Topol M.

• Department of Angiology, Chair of Anatomy and Histology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

autor

Polguj M.

• Department of Normal and Clinical Anatomy, Chair of Anatomy and Histology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Adachi B. Das Arteriensystem der Japaner. Verlag der Kais Univ zu Kyoto. 1928; 2: 18–71.
• 2. Al-Talalwah W. The medial circumflex femoral artery origin variability and its radiological and surgical intervention significance. Springerplus. 2015; 4: 149, doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-0881-2, indexed in Pubmed: 25883882.
• 3. Aslaner R, Pekcevik Y, Sahin H, et al. Variations in the origin of inferior phrenic arteries and their relationship to celiac axis variations on CT angiography. Korean J Radiol. 2017; 18(2): 336–344, doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.2.336, indexed in Pubmed: 28246513.
• 4. Bergman RA, Afifi AK, Miyauchi R. Anatomy Atlases: Illustrated Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation - Anatomical Variation | Radiology Anatomy | Anatomy Atlas. 2015.
• 5. Chomiak J, Horák M, Masek M, et al. Computed tomographic angiography in proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(8): 1954–1964, doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00902, indexed in Pubmed: 19651955.
• 6. Fukuda H, Ashida M, Ishii R, et al. Anatomical variants of the lateral femoral circumflex artery: an angiographic study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005; 27(3): 260–264, doi: 10.1007/s00276-004-0312-5, indexed in Pubmed: 15682274.
• 7. Freitas A, Aires HN, Pansiere ST, et al. Anatomical description of the proximal third of the medial femoral circumflex artery. A cadaveric study. Acta Ortop Bras Brazilian Soc Orthop Traumatol. 2012; 20: 21–24.
• 8. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, et al. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(5): 679–683, indexed in Pubmed: 10963165.
• 9. Kaempf M, Ketelsen D, Syha R, et al. CT angiography of various superficial femoral artery stents: an in vitro phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(7): 1584–1588, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.014, indexed in Pubmed: 21546182.
• 10. Lippert H, Pabst R. Arterial variations in man. Classification and frequency. 1985, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-80508-0_1.
• 11. Manjappa T, Prasanna LC. Anatomical variations of the profunda femoris artery and its branches: a cadaveric study in South Indian population. Indian J Surg. 2014; 76(4): 288–292, doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0677-3, indexed in Pubmed: 25278652.
• 12. Massoud TF, Fletcher EW. Anatomical variants of the profunda femoris artery: an angiographic study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997; 19(2): 99–103, indexed in Pubmed: 9210243.
• 13. Mauro MA, Jaques PF, Moore M. The popliteal artery and its branches: embryologic basis of normal and variant anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 150(2): 435–437, doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.2.435, indexed in Pubmed: 3257338.
• 14. Nasr AY, Badawoud MH, Al-Hayani AA, et al. Origin of profunda femoris artery and its circumflex femoral branches: anatomical variations and clinical significance. Folia Morphol. 2014; 73(1): 58–67, doi: 10.5603/FM.2014.0008, indexed in Pubmed: 24590524.
• 15. Olasińska-Wiśniewska A, Grygier M, Lesiak M, et al. Femoral artery anatomy-tailored approach in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Post Kardiol Int. 2017; 13(2): 150–156, doi: 10.5114/pwki.2017.68050, indexed in Pubmed: 28798786.
• 16. Olewnik Ł, Waśniewska A, Polguj M, et al. Rare combined variations of renal, suprarenal, phrenic and accessory hepatic arteries. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018; 40(7): 743–748, doi: 10.1007/s00276-018-2026-0, indexed in Pubmed: 29667030.
• 17. Olewnik Ł, Wysiadecki G, Polguj M, et al. A rare anastomosis between the common hepatic artery and the superior mesenteric artery: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017; 39(10): 1175–1179, doi: 10.1007/s00276-017-1859-2, indexed in Pubmed: 28432408.
• 18. Olewnik Ł, Wysiadecki G, Polguj M, et al. Types of coeliac trunk branching including accessory hepatic arteries: a new point of view based on cadaveric study. Folia Morphol. 2017; 76: 660–667, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2017.0053, indexed in Pubmed: 28612916.
• 19. Perera J. Anatomy of the origin of the deep femoral artery. Ceylon Med J. 1995; 40(4): 139–141, indexed in Pubmed: 8689700.
• 20. Prakash , Kumari J, Kumar Bhardwaj A, et al. Variations in the origins of the profunda femoris, medial and lateral femoral circumflex arteries: a cadaver study in the Indian population. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2010; 51(1): 167–170, indexed in Pubmed: 20191139.
• 21. Rajani SJ, Ravat MK, Rajani JK, et al. Cadaveric Study of Profunda Femoris Artery with Some Unique Variations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(5): AC01–AC03, doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13913.5876, indexed in Pubmed: 26155466.
• 22. Siddharth P, Smith NL, Mason RA, et al. Variational anatomy of the deep femoral artery. Anat Rec. 1985; 212(2): 206–209, doi: 10.1002/ar.1092120216, indexed in Pubmed: 3842043.
• 23. Sinnatamby C. Last’s anatomy: regional and applied. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Toronto 2006.
• 24. Tanyeli E, Uzel M, Yildirim M, et al. An anatomical study of the origins of the medial circumflex femoral artery in the Turkish population. Folia Morphol. 2006; 65(3): 209–212, indexed in Pubmed: 16988917.
• 25. Tomaszewski KA, Henry BM, Vikse J, et al. The origin of the medial circumflex femoral artery: a meta-analysis and proposal of a new classification system. Peer J. 2016; 4: e1726, doi: 10.7717/peerj.1726, indexed in Pubmed: 26966661.
• 26. Tomaszewski KA, Vikse J, Henry BM, et al. The variable origin of the lateral circumflex femoral artery: a meta-analysis and proposal for a new classification system. Folia Morphol. 2017; 76(2): 157–167, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0056, indexed in Pubmed: 27714726.
• 27. Uzel M, Tanyeli E, Yildirim M, et al. An anatomical study of the origins of the medial circumflex femoral artery in the Turkish population. Folia Morphol. 2008; 67(3): 226–230, indexed in Pubmed: 16988917.
• 28. Vazquez MT, Murillo J, Maranillo E, et al. Patterns of the circumflex femoral arteries revisited. Clin Anat. 2007; 20(2): 180–185, doi: 10.1002/ca.20336, indexed in Pubmed: 16617441.
• 29. Vuksanović-Božarić A, Abramović M, Vučković L, et al. Clinical significance of understanding lateral and medial circumflex femoral artery origin variability. Anat Sci Int. 2018; 93(4): 449–455, doi: 10.1007/s12565-018-0434-1, indexed in Pubmed: 29500659.
• 30. Zlotorowicz M, Czubak-Wrzosek M, Wrzosek P, et al. The origin of the medial femoral circumflex artery, lateral femoral circumflex artery and obturator artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018; 40(5): 515–520, doi: 10.1007/s00276-018-2012-6, indexed in Pubmed: 29651567.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2019.0033