Survey of the anti-Brucella antibody status determined by ELISA testing in wild boars in Poland

• Autorzy: Szulowski K. , Iwaniak W. , Zlotnicka J. , Szymajda M. , Weiner M. , Lipowski A. , Jablonski A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Sera of 4407 wild boars (Sus scrofa) shot by hunters in Poland in 2012 were tested by ELISA for antiBrucella antibodies. Samples originated from 11 out of 16 voivodeships, and 1077 (24.44%) seroreagents were detected. The highest prevalence of wild boars with anti-Brucella antibodies was found in Opolskie (39.9%) and Wielkopolskie (37.29%) voivodeships. The lowest percentage of positive results was observed in Kujawsko- -Pomorskie (13.74%) and Łódzkie (15.47%) voivodeships. The results for particular districts revealed significant differences in the prevalence of anti-Brucella antibodies, which varied between 0 and 100%. The results of the surveys show that wild boars constitute an enormous reservoir of Brucella suis biovar 2 microorganisms in Poland. The next stage of the study will see examinations of wild boars continued by bacteriological and molecular methods.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 71
• Numer: 04
• Opis fizyczny: p.215-218,fig.ref.

Twórcy

autor

Szulowski K.

• Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al.Partyzantow 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Iwaniak W.

• Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al.Partyzantow 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Zlotnicka J.

• Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al.Partyzantow 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Szymajda M.

• Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al.Partyzantow 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Weiner M.

• Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al.Partyzantow 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Lipowski A.

• Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al.Partyzantow 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Jablonski A.

• Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al.Partyzantow 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Al Dahouk S., Nöckler K., Tomaso H., Splettstoesser W. D., Jungersen G., Riber U., Petry T., Hoffmann D., Scholz H. C., Hensel A., Neubauer H.:Seroprevalence of Brucellosis, Tularemia, and Yersiniosis in Wild Boars (Susscrofa) from North-Eastern Germany. J. Vet. Med. B 2005, 52, 444-455.
• 2. Cvetnic Z. Mitak M., Ocepek O., Lojkic M., Terzic S., Jemersic L., Humski A., Habrun B., Sostaric B., Brstilo M., Krt B., Garin-Bastuji B.: Wild boars (Sus scrofa) as reservoirs of Brucella suis biovar 2 in Croatia. Acta Vet. Hung. 2003, 51, 465-473.
• 3. Cvetnic Z., Toncic J., Spicic S., Lojkic M., Terzic S., Jemersic L., Humski A., Curic S., Mitak M., Habrun B., Brstilo M., Ocepek M., Krt B.: Brucellosis inwild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Republic of Croatia. Vet. Med. – Czech. 2004,49, 115-122.
• 4. Fretin D., Mori M., Czaplicki G., Quinet C., Maquet B., Godfroid J., Saegerman C.: Unexpected Brucella suis Biovar 2 Infection in a Dairy Cow, Belgium. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 2053-2054.
• 5. Garin-Bastuji B., Hars J., Calvez D., Thiebaud M., Cau C., Sartor C., Artois M.: Brucellosis in domestic pigs and wild boars due to Brucella suisbiovar 2 in France, [in:] Conference, Brucellosis, September 7-9, Nimes,France 2000, p. 44.
• 6. Godfroid J., Michel P., Uytterhaegen L., De Smedt C., Rasseneuf F., Boelaert F. ,Saegerman C., Patigny X.: Brucellose enzootique a Brucella suis biotype 2 chez le sanglier (Sus scrofa) en Belgique. Ann. Med. Vet. 1994, 138, 263-268.
• 7. Hubalek Z., Treml F., Juricova Z., Hunady M., Halouzka J., Janik V., Bill D.: Serological survey of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) for tularaemia and brucellosisin South Moravia, Czech Republic. Vet. Med. – Czech. 2000, 47, 60-66.
• 8. Kautzsch S., Seyfarth D., Schone R., Stehmann R.: An outbreak of brucellosis in pigs and conclusions derived on the epidemiology of this animal disease.Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 1995, 108, 201-205.
• 9. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. OIE, Paris, France 2009.
• 10. Paton N. I., Tee N., Vu C. H., Teo T.: Visceral abscesses due to Brucella suis infection in a retired pig farmer. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 32, 129-130.
• 11. Porcine brucellosis (Brucella suis). Scientific opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. EFSA Journal 2009, 1144, 1-112.
• 12. Szulowski K.: The value of ELISA in diagnosis of brucellosis in animals. Ph.D. Thesis, NVRI Pulawy 1997.
• 13. Szulowski K., Iwaniak W., Weiner M., Złotnicka J.: Brucella suis biovar 2 isolations from cattle in Poland. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2013, 20, 672-675.
• 14. Szulowski K., Iwaniak W., Weiner M., Złotnicka J.: Characteristics of Brucella strains isolated from animals in Poland. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2013, 16, 757-758.
• 15. Szulowski K., Pilaszek J., Iwaniak W.: Application of meat juice in diagnosis of brucellosis in hares and wild boars by ELISA. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2000,44, 45-52.
• 16. Teyssou R., Morvan J., Leleu J. P., Roumegou P., Goullin B., Carteron B.: About a case of human brucellosis due to Brucella suis biovar 2. Med. Mal.Infect. 1989, 19, 160-161.
• 17. Weiner M., Szulowski K., Iwaniak W.: The porcine brucellosis – evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in occurrence of false positive serologicalreactions. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2013, 16, 129-130.
• 18. Wrathall A. E., Broughton E. S., Gill K. P., Goldsmith G. P.: Serological reactions to Brucella species in British pigs. Vet. Rec. 1993, 132, 449-454.