The construction and empirical verification of the Sense of Team Efficacy Questionnaire (Kwestionariusz Poczucia Druzynowej Skutecznosci)

• Autorzy: Walach-Bista Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: This article presents the procedure of the elaboration and verification of the first Polish Sense of Team Efficacy Questionnaire (Kwestionariusz Poczucia Druzynowej Skutecznosci – KPDS). Material/Methods: Two research stages involved a total of 373 professional athletes. Based on the collected data, the internal structure and psychometric properties of the instrument were established. Results: As a result of the conducted statistical analyses, a questionnaire was obtained. Analyses confirmed the stability of the internal structure of the questionnaire. The instrument also obtained satisfactory coefficients of reliability (using Cronbach’s alpha internal reliability coefficient) and construct validity. In order to establish the convergent and discriminant validity of the KPDS, the analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix was applied, using the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ). Predictive validity was established using the result obtained in a match played directly after the conducted study. Conclusions: The obtained results confirmed the relevance of creating the KPDS. The questionnaire was made up of 21 items representing 4 subscales: fitness, preparation, effort and endurance. Calculation of a general score for the KPDS also proved to be possible.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity. The Journal of Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 07
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.14-28,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Walach-Bista Z.

• Department of Social and Environmental Sociology, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Bandura A. Teoria spolecznego uczenia sie [Social learning theory]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2007. Polish.
• [2] Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
• [3] Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, editors. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing; 2006, 307-337.
• [4] Zaccaro SJ, Blair V, Peterson C, Zazanis, M. Collective-efficacy. In: Maddux JE, editor. Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment: Theory, research and application. New York: Plenum; 1995, 308-330.
• [5] Gully SM, Incalcaterra KA, Joshi A, Beaubien JM. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. J Appl Psy-chol. 2002;87:819-832.
• [6] Stajkovic AD, Lee D, Nyberg AJ. Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta analyses of their relationship, and test of a mediation model. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94:814-828.
• [7] Bray SR. Collective efficacy, group goals, and group performance of a muscular endurance task. Small Group Research. 2004;35:230-238.
• [8] Hodges L, Carron A. Collective-efficacy and group performance. Int J Sport Psychol. 1992;23:48-59.
• [9] Greenless IA, Graydon JK, Maynard IW. The impact of collective efficacy beliefs on effort and persistence in a group task. J Sport Sci. 1999;17:151-158.
• [10] Lichacz FM, Partington JT. Collective-efficacy and true performance. Int J Sport Psychol. 1996;27:146-158.
• [11] Greenless IA, Graydon JK, Maynard IW. The impact of individual efficacy beliefs on group goal selection and group goal commitment. J Sport Sci. 2000;18:451-459.
• [12] Myers ND, Feltz DL, Short SE. Collective-efficacy and team performance: A longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. 2004;8:126-138.
• [13] Myers ND, Payment CA, Feltz DL. Reciprocal relationships between collective efficacy and team performance in women’s ice hockey. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. 2004;8:182-195.
• [14] Blecharz J, Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R, Siekanska M, Cieslak R. Predicting performance and performance satisfaction: mindfulness and beliefs about the ability to deal with social barriers in sport. Anxiety, Stress, And Coping. 2014;27:270-287.
• [15] Short SE, Sullivan P, Feltz DL. Development and Preliminary Validation of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sport. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2005;9:181-202.
• [16] Hornowska E. Testy psychologiczne. Teoria i praktyka [Psychological tests. Theory and practice]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar; 2013. Polish.
• [17] Zakrzewska M. Analiza czynnikowa w budowaniu i sprawdzaniu modeli psychologicznych [Factor analysis in constructing and verifying psychological models]. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza; 1994. Polish.
• [18] Wieczorkowska G, Wierzbinski J. Statystyka. Analiza badan społecznych [Statistics. Analysis of social research]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar; 2007. Polish.
• [19] Bedynska S, Cypryanska M. Zaawansowane metody tworzenia wskaznikow – eksploracyjna analiza czynnikowa i testowanie rzetelnosci skali [Advanced methods of creating indices – exploratory factor analysis and testing the reliability of scales]. In: Bedynska S, Cypryanska M, editors. Statystyczny drogowskaz 1. Praktyczne wprowadzenie do wnioskowania statystycznego. Warsaw: Szkoła Wyzsza Psychologii Społecznej i Wydawnictwo Akademickie Sedno; 2013, 245-283. Polish.
• [20] Brzozowski P. Skala uczuc pozytywnych i negatywnych SUPIN. Polska adaptacja skali PANAS Davida Watsona i Lee Anny Clark. Podrecznik. [SUPIN Scale of positive and negative feelings. Polish adaptation of David Watson’s and Lee Ann Clark’s PANAS scale. Textbook.]. Warsaw: Pracownia Testow Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego; 2010. Polish.
• [21] Carron AV. Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and Considerations. J Sport Psychol. 1982;4:123-138.
• [22] Carron AV, Hausenblas HA, Eys MA. Group dynamics in sport (3rd ed.). Morgantown, WV: Fitness In-formation Technology; 2005.
• [23] Beauchamp MR. Efficacy beliefs within relational and group contexts in sport. In: Jowett S, Lavallee D, editors. Social psychology in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2007, 181-193.
• [24] Beauchamp MR, Eys MA. Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology: Contemporary themes. London/New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2008.
• [25] Spink KS. Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1990;12:301-311.
• [26] Paskevich DM, Brawley LR, Dorsch KD, Widmeyer WN. Relationship between collective efficacy and team cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. 1999;3:210-222.
• [27] Kozub SA, McDonnell JF. Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. J Sport Behav. 2000;23:120-129.
• [28] Heuze JP, Bosselut G, Thomas JP. Should the coaches of elite female handball teams focus on collective efficacy or group cohesion? The Sport Psychologist. 2007;21:383-399.
• [29] Heuze JP, Raimbault N, Fontayne P. Relationships between cohesion, collective-efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects. J Sport Sci. 2006;24:59-68.
• [30] Carron AV, Widmeyer W, Brawley LR. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. J Sport Psychol. 1985;7:244-266.
• [31] Krawczynski M. Spojnosc grupowa a dojrzałosc spoleczna. Studia z psychologii sportu [Group cohesion and social maturity. Studies in sports psychology]. Gdansk: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane AWF; 1995. Polish.