Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 66 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

Survey of discarded bottles as an effective method in detection of small mammal diversity

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
We assess if survey of containers discarded by people (and collected within environmental cleanup actions) may be an useful method in detection of small mammal species and how different parameters of containers affect mammal mortality. The discarded containers without stoppers were collected from two sites (one forest and one agricultural) in western Poland. In 13 bottles (out of 288 collected containers), 58 specimens belonging to 10 species were found. Remains were found mostly in color glass bottles with mouth diameter 18–31 mm and 0.5–5.0 l capacity. We detected only six small mammal species during four short-term live-trapping sessions performed in the same sites. Thus, we suggest that the survey of discarded bottles may be an efficient complement to traditional scientific methods (as live-trapping), which can be performed by both specialists and amateurs, who, at the same time, would clean the environment of the ecological traps.
Opis fizyczny
  • Department of Evolutionary Biology and Conservation of Vertebrates, Wroclaw University, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wroclaw, Poland
  • Department of Systematic Zoology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
  • Department of Systematic Zoology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
  • Department of Systematic Zoology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
  • Arnold H.R. 1993 — Atlas of Mammals in Britain — HMSO, London, UK.
  • Arrizabalaga A., González L.M., Torre I. 2016 — Small mammals in discarded bottles: a new world record — Galemys, 28: 63–65.
  • Benedict R.A., Billeter M.C. 2004 — Discarded bottles as a cause of mortality in small vertebrates — Southeast. Nat. 3: 371–377.
  • Brannon P.M., Burt M.A., Bost D.M, Caswell M.C. 2010 — Discarded bottles as a source of shrew species distributional data along an elevational gradient in the Southern Appalachians — Southeast. Nat. 9: 781– 794.
  • Brannon P.M., Brannon J.K.H., Baird R.E. 2017 — Educational applications of smallmammal skeletal remains found in discarded bottles — Southeast. Nat. 16: 4–10.
  • Cichocki J., Kościelska A., Piłacińska B., Kowalski M., Ważna A., Dobosz R., Nowakowski K., Lesiński G., Gabryś G. 2014 — Occurrence of lesser white-toothed shrew Crocidura suaveolens (Pallas, 1811) in Poland — Acta Biol. 21: 149–168.
  • Clegg T.M. 1966 — The abundance of shrews, as indicated by trapping and remains in discarded bottles — Naturalist (Hull) 899: 122.
  • Darabi M., Zeini Z., Karami A., Kaveh A. 2017 — Nocturnal activity and habitat selection of Hotson Jerboa, Allactaga hotsoni Thomas, 1920 (Rodentia: Dipodidae) — J. Wildlife Biodiver. 1: 33–36.
  • Gerard A.S., Feldhamer G.A. 1990 — A comparison of two survey methods for shrews: pitfalls and discarded bottles — Am. Midl. Nat. 124: 191–194.
  • Gilroy J.J., Sutherland W.J. 2007 — Beyond ecological traps: perceptual errors and undervalued resources — Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 351–356.
  • Glennon M.J., Porter W.F., Demers C.F. 2002 — An alternative field technique for estimating diversity of small-mammal populations — J. Mammal. 83: 734–742.
  • Hamed K.M., Laughlin T.F. 2015 — Smallmammal mortality caused by discarded bottles and cans along a US Forest Service Road in the Cherokee National Forest — Southeast. Nat. 4: 506–516.
  • Heisler L.M., Somers C.M., Poulin R.G. 2016 — Owl pellets: a more effective alternative to conventional trapping for broad-scale studies of small mammal communities — Methods Ecol. Evol. 7: 96–103.
  • Jacobs J. 1974 — Quantitative measurement of food selection. A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev's electivity index — Oecologia, 14: 413–417.
  • Luiselli L., Capizzi D. 1996 — Composition of a small mammal community studied by three comparative methods — Acta Theriol. 41: 425–431.
  • Machar I., Poprach K. 2012 — Tanks and cisterns for fodder molasses on farms as ecological traps — Listy cukrov, řepař. 128: 347–349.
  • McAleece N., Gage J.D.G., Lambshead P.J.D., Paterson G.L.J. 1997 — BioDiversity Professional statistics analysis software. Jointly developed by the Scottish Association for Marine Science and the Natural History Museum London.
  • Morris P.A., Harper J.F. 1965 — The occurrence of small mammals in discarded bottles — Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 145: 148–153.
  • Okarma H., Bogdanowicz W., Rychlik L., Szuma E. 2011 — [Atlas of Polish Mammals] — Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 67: 21–26. (in Polish).
  • Pagels J.F., French T.W. 1987 — Discarded bottles as a source of small mammals distribution data — Am. Midl. Nat. 118: 217–219.
  • Poeta G., Romiti F., Battisti C. 2015 — Discarded bottles in sandy coastal dunes as a threat for macro-invertebrate populations: first evidence of trap effect — Vie Milieu, 65: 125–127.
  • Pucek Z. 1981 — Keys to Vertebrates of Poland. Mammals — PWN, Warsaw.
  • Robertson B.A., Rehage J.S., Sih A. 2013 — Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps — Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 552–560.
  • Torre I., Arrizabalaga A., Flaquer C. 2004 — Three methods for assessing richness and composition of small mammal communities — J. Mammal. 85: 528–530.
  • The World Bank 1999 — What a waste: solid waste management in Asia — Urban Development Division, East Asia and Pacific Region.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.