Developmental potential of selectively enucleated mouse zygotes reconstituted with embryonic cell, embryonic stem celland somatic cell nuclei

• Autorzy: Greda P. , Modlinski J.A. , Piliszek A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In an overwhelming majority of experiments, both mammalian embryonic and somatic cloning have relied on introducing exogenous nuclei into enucleated metaphase II (MII) oocytes. Since attempts at cloning using interphase zygotes as recipient cells have failed, these cells were – until quite recently – commonly regarded as poor recipients for nuclear transfer. However, we have recently shown that interphase zygotes can be successfully used as recipients of embryonic nuclei. In a previous study, we used our original method of selective enucleation (SE), in which the pronuclear envelope with attached chromatin is removed while the liquid pronuclear contents and nucleoli in the zygote’s cytoplasm are left intact, to obtain fertile mice upon transfer of 8-cell (1/8) nuclei into SE zygotes. Here we report that 16-cell (1/16) nuclei can also support full-term development. Additionally, full pre-implantation development, albeit to a limited degree, was obtained after transfer of embryonic stem (ES) cell and foetal fibroblast (FF) nuclei (2.4% and 2.5%, respectively). Sporadically, SE zygotes reconstructed with FF nuclei were able to implant, but they never developed beyond midpregnancy. Our results clearly indicate that SE zygotes can be successfully used as competitive recipients of embryonic nuclei from, at least, the 16-cell (morula) stage. However, their use as recipients of ES cell and somatic cell nuclei seems to be questionable.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Animal Science Papers and Reports
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 33
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.323-336,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Greda P.

• Department of Experimental Embryology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland

autor

Modlinski J.A.

• Department of Experimental Embryology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland

autor

Piliszek A.

• Department of Experimental Embryology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland

Bibliografia

• ABBONDANZO S.J., GADI I., STEWART C.L., 1993 – Derivation of embryonic stem cell lines.Methods in Enzymology 35, 803-823.
• BRIGGS R., KING T., 1952 – Transplantation of living nuclei from blastula calls into enucleated frog’s eggs. Proceedings of the Nacional Academy of Sciences 38, 455-461.
• BUEHR M., McLAREN A., 1985 - Expression of glucose-phosphate isomerase in relation to growth of the mouse oocyte in vivo and in vitro. Gamete Research 11, 271-281.
• CHEONG H.T., KANAGAWA H., 1993 – Assesment of cytoplasmic effects on the development of mouse embryonic nuclei transferred to enucleated zygotes. Theriogenology 39, 451-461.
• EGLI D., ROSAINS J., BIRKHOFF G., EGGAN K., 2007 – Developmental reprogramming after chromosome transfer into mitotic mouse zygotes. Nature 447,679-685.
• EGLI D., EGGAN K., 2010 – Recipient cell nuclear factors are required for reprogramming by nuclear transfer. Development 137, 1953-1963.
• GRĘDA P., KARASIEWICZ J., MODLIŃSKI J.A., 2006 – Mouse zygotes as recipients in embryo cloning. Reproduction 132,741-748.
• GURDON J.B., 1968 – Changes in somatic nuclei inserted into growing and matured amphibian oocytes. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 20, 401-414.
• GURDON J.B., LASKEY R.A., DEROBERTIS E.M., PARTINGTON G.A., 1979 – Reprograming of transplanted nuclei in amphibian. International Review of Cytology 9, 161-178.
• GURDON J.B., LASKEY R.A., REEVES O.R., 1975 – The development capacity of nuclei transplanted from keratinized skin cells of adult frogs. Journal od Embryology and Experimental Morphology 34, 93-112.
• HOWLETT S.K., BARTON S.C., AND SURANI M.A., 1987 – Nuclear cytoplasmic interactions following nuclear transplantation in mouse embryos. Development 101, 915-923.
• ILLMENSEE K., HOPPE P.C., 1981 – Nuclear transplantation in Mus musculus: Developmental potential of nuclei from preimplantation embryos. Cell 23 (1), 9-18.
• KONO T., SHIODA Y., TSUNODA Y., 1988 – Nuclear transplantation of rat embryos. Journal of Experimental Zoology 248, 303-305.
• KUBIAK J.Z., TARKOWSKI A.K., 1985 – Electrofusion of mouse blastomeres. Experimental Cell Research 17, 561-566.
• LOI P., MODLIŃSKI J.A., PTAK G., 2011 – Interspecies somatic cloning: a salvage tool seeking first aid? Theriogenology 76, 217-228.
• LORTHONGPANICH C., SOLTER D., Lim C.Y. ,2010 – Nuclear reprogramming in zygotes. TheInternational Journal of Developmental Biology 84,1631-1640.
• McGRATH J., SOLTER D., 1983 – Nuclear transplantation in the mouse embryo by microsurgery and cell fusion. Science 220, 1300-1302.
• McGRATH J., SOLTER D., 1984 - Inability of mouse blastomere nuclei transferred to enucleated zygotes to support development in vitro. Science 226, 1317-1319.
• MENG L., ELY J.J., STOUFFER R.L., WOLF D.P., 1997 – Rhesus monkey produced by nuclear transfer. Biology of Reproduction 57, 454-459.
• MODLIŃSKI J.A., 1975 – Haploid mouse embryos obtained by microsurgical removal of one pronucleus. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 33. 897-905.
• MODLIŃSKI J.A., GRĘDA P., KĘSKA M., PĘCZKOWICZ-SZYSZKA J., KOTLARSKA M.,SKRZYSZOWSKA M., SAMIEC M., SŁOMSKI R., SMORĄG Z. – Selectively enucleated zygotes as recipients in pig somatic cloning. Animal Science Papers and Reports (submitted).
• MODLIŃSKI J.A., SMORĄG Z., 1991 – Preimplantation development of rabbit embryos after transfer of embryonic nuclei into different cytoplasmic environment. Molecular Reproduction and Development 28,361-372.
• OZIL J.P., MODLIŃSKI J.A. 1986 – Effects of electric field on fusion rate and survival of 2-cell rabbit embryos. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 96, 211-28.
• POLANSKI Z., HOFFMAN S., TSURUMI C., 2005 – Oocyte nucleus controls progression through meiotic maturation. Developmental Biology. 281,184-195.
• PRATHER R.S., FIRST N.L., 1990 – Cloning embryos by nuclear transfer. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (Suppl.) 41, 125-134.
• PRATHER R.S., SIMS M.M., FIRST N.L., 1989 – Nuclear transplantation in early pig embryo.Biology of Reproduction 41, 414-418.
• ROBERTSON E.J., 1987 – Embryo-derived stem cell lines. In:” Teratocarcinomas and embryonic stem cell: A practical approach”. (E.J. ROBERTSON, ed.) IRL press, Oxford, 71-112.
• ROBL J.M., GILLIGAN B., CRITSER E.S. AND FIRST N.L., 1986 – Nuclear transplantation in mouse embryos: Assesment of recipient cell stage. Biology of Reproduction 34, 733-739.
• SCHURMANN A., WELLS D.N., OBACK B., 2006 – Early zygotes are suitable recipients for bovine somatic nuclear transfer and result in cloned offspring. Reproduction 132,839-848.
• SMITH L.C., WILMUT I., HUNTER R.H.F., 1988 – Influence of cell cycle stage at nuclear transplantation on the development in vitro of mouse embryos. Journal of Reproduction andFertility 84, 619-624.
• TARKOWSKI A.K. 1966 – An air-drying method for chromosome prepartions from mouse eggs.Cytogenetics 5, 394-400.
• TARKOWSKI A.K., WRÓBLEWSKA J., 1967 – Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at 4- and 8-cell stage. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 18, 155-180
• TSUNODA Y., KATO Y., 1997 – Full-term development after transfer of nuclei from 4-cell and compacted morula stage embryos to enucleated oocytes in the mouse. Journal of Experimental Zoology 278, 250-254.
• WAKAYAMA T., PERRY A.C.F., ZUCOTTI M., JOHNSON K.R., YANAGIMACHI R., 1998 –Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cells nuclei. Nature 394, 369-374.
• WAKAYAMA T., TATENO H., MOMBEARTS P., YANAGIMACH R. 2000 – Nuclear transfer into mouse zygotes. Nature Genetics 24, 108-109.
• WILLADSEN S.M., 1986 – Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos. Nature 320, 63-65.
• WILMUT I, SCHNIEKE A.E., MCWHIRE J., KIND A.J., CAMPBELL K.H.S., 1997 – Viable offspring derived from fetal and adults mammalian cells. Nature 285, 810-813.

Uwagi

Rekord w opracowaniu