Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 10 | 4 |
Tytuł artykułu

The effects of concurrent visual versus verbal feedback on swimming strength task execution

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Background: ‪The aim was to compare the effects of two different types of concurrent feedback administration on biomechanical performance during a swimming-specific task. Material and methods: ‪A counterbalanced repeated measures design was used to compare the execution of the butterfly stroke (the propulsion phase only) on a modified Smith machine. Twenty repetitions were performed in each condition of feedback (visual vs. verbal). Fourteen college swimmers (age x̄ = 22.21 ±1.85 years, height x̄ = 173.71 ±8.65 cm, mass x̄ = 71.32 ±10.64 kg) were recruited. An incremental force test was administered for each participant to determine the mean propulsive velocity in which maximal power was produced. Feedback addressed correct execution velocity of the pulling movement that corresponded to the maximal power production as determined in an incremental force test. Results: T testing revealed no statistically significant differences between the verbal and visual feedback conditions. Visual feedback elicited a correct response in 76.11% of total feedback compared with 72.06% in the verbal feedback condition. Conclusions: ‪Considering total feedback response, the visual feedback condition elicited 4.05% more correct responses than verbal feedback. However, this difference did not attain statistical significance and, therefore, the underlying hypothesis could not be confirmed.
Słowa kluczowe
  • Department of Swimming, Faculty of Physical Education, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
  • Department of Swimming, Faculty of Physical Education, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
  • Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
  • Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
  • Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
  • [1] Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning. A behavioral emphasis, 5th edition. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2011.
  • [2] Wrisberg C. Sport Skill Instruction for Coaches. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2007.
  • [3] Silverman SS, Woods AM, Subramaniam PR. Task structures, feedback to individual students, and student skill level in physical education. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998;69:420-424. 080/02701367.1998.10607718
  • [4] Magill RA. The influence of augmented feedback during skill learning depends on characteristics of the skill and the learner. Quest. 1994;46:314-327.
  • [5] Scheeler MC, Ruhl K, McAfee J. Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teach Educ Spec Educ. 2004;27(4):396-407.
  • [6] Proteau L, Carnahan H. What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors? J Motor Behav. 2001;33(3):226-234.
  • [7] Zatoń K, Szczepan S. The impact of immediate verbal feedback on the improvement of swimming technique. J Human Kinet. 2014;41:129-137.
  • [8] Pérez P, Llana S, Brizuela G, Encarnación A. Effects of three feedback conditions on aerobic swim speeds. J Sport Sci Med. 2009;8:30-36.
  • [9] Maglischo E. Swimming fastest. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2003.
  • [10] Tovin BJ. Prevention and treatment of swimmer’s shoulder. North Am J Sport Phys Ther. 2006;1(4):166-175.
  • [11] Chatard JC, Stewart A.M. Training load and performance in swimming. In: Seifert L, Chollet D, Mujika I. editors. World book of swimming: From science to performance. New York: Nova Science Publishing, Inc.; 2011.
  • [12] Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956;63:81-97.
  • [13] Borg G. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 1998.
  • [14] Cohen L, Manion L. Morrison K. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge; 2002.
  • [15] Stastny P, Tufano JJ, Kregl J, et al. The role of visual feedback on power output during intermittent Wingate testing in ice hockey players. Sports. 2018;6(2):32.
  • [16] Campenella B, Mattacola CG, Kimura IF. Effect of visual feedback and verbal encouragement on concentric quadriceps and hamstrings peak torque of males and females. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2000; 8:1-6.
  • [17] Hopper DM, Axel Berg MA, Andersen H, Madan R. The influence of visual feedback on power during leg press on elite women field hockey players. Phys Ther Sport. 2003;4:182-186.
  • [18] Zatoń K, Cześniewicz I, Szczepan S. The effect of verbal feedback on biomechanical performance during swimming ergometry. Hum Mov. 2018;19(1):3-9.
  • [19] Zatoń K. The role of verbal information about sensory experience from movement apparatus in the process of swimming economization. In: Kjendlie PL, Stallman RK, Cabri J, eds. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI: proceedings of the XIth International Symposium for Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming. Oslo: Norwegian School of Sport Sciences; 2010, 349-351.
  • [20] Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, Wolf P. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bull Rev. 2013;20:21-53.
  • [21] Cutton DM, Landin D. The Effects of self-talk and augmented feedback on learning the tennis forehand. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2007;19(3):288-303.
  • [22] Rucci JA, Tomporowski PD. Three types of kinematic feedback and the execution of the hang power clean. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(3):771-778.
  • [23] Guadagnoli M, Holcomb W, Davis M. The efficacy of video feedback for learning the golf swing. J Sport Sci. 2002;20:615-622.
  • [24] More KG, Franks IM. Analysis and modification of verbal coaching behaviour: The usefulness of a datadriven intervention strategy. J Sport Sci. 1996;14:523-543.
  • [25] Boyce BA. The Effects of an Instructional Strategy with Two Schedules of Augmented KP Feedback upon Skill Acquisition of a Selected Shooting Task. J Teach Phys Educ. 1991;11:47-58. https://doi. org/10.1123/jtpe.11.1.47
  • [26] Hermann T, Honer O, Ritter H. Acoumotion-an interactive sonification system for acoustic motion control. Lect Notes Comp Sci. 2006;3881:312-323.
  • [27] Utley A, Astill S. Motor control, learning and development. Bios Instant Notes: Taylor & Francis; 2008.
  • [28] Timmermans AAA, Seelen HAM, Willmann RD, Kingma H. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: Concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2009;6:1.
  • [29] Proteau L. Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task. Exp Brain Res. 2005:161:441-456.
  • [30] Blandin Y, Proteau L. On the cognitive basis of observational learning: development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. Q J Exp Psychol A Hum Exp Psychol. 2000;53(3):846-867.
  • [31] Wishart LR, Lee TD, Cunningham SJ, Murdoch JE. Age-related differences and the role of augmented visual feedback in learning a bimanual coordination pattern. Acta Psychologia. 2002;110(2-3):247-263.
  • [32] Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ, Stojanovski E. Real-time feedback improves accuracy of manually applied forces during cervical spine mobilisation. Manual Ther. 2010;15:19-25.
  • [33] Amorose AJ, Smith PJK. Feedback as a source of physical competence information: effect of age, experience and type of feedback. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2003;25:341-359.
  • [34] Lee T, Swinnen S, Serrien J. Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest. 1994;46:328-344.
  • [35] Weinberg S, Gould D. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 1995.
  • [36] Gonzalez V, Sanchis E, Villalobos M, Brizuela G, Llana S, Tella V. A new electronic system for the control of swimming speed. In: Chatard JC, editor. Book of abstract: Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. France: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne; 2002, 67-69.
  • [37] Szczepan S, Zatoń K, Klarowicz A. The effect of concurrent visual feedback on controlling swimming speed. Pol J Sport Tourism. 2016; 23, 1: 3-6.
  • [38] Szczepan S, Zatoń K, Borkowski J. The impact of the visual concurrent swimming speed control on improving the economization of swimming. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2018;10(2):65-71. https://doi. org/10.29359/BJHPA.10.2.06
  • [39] Szczepan S, Zatoń K. Validation of the new visual swimming pace control system in real-time. Cent Eur J Sport Sci Med. 2017;19(3):93-104.
  • [40] Seat JE, Wrisberg CA. The visual instruction system. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67:106-108.
  • [41] Brière J, Proteau L. Visual monitoring of goal-directed aiming movements. QJEP. 2017;70(4):736-749.
  • [42] Gallimore R, Tharp R. What a coach can teach a teacher. 1975-2004: Reflections and reanalysis of John Wooden’s teaching practices. Sport Psychologist. 2004;18:119-137.
  • [43] Mackrous I, Proteau L. Is visual-based, online control of manual-aiming movements disturbed when adapting to new movement dynamics? Vision Res. 2015;110(Pt B):223-32.
  • [44] Ribeiro DC, Sole G, Abbott JH, Milosavljevic S. The effectiveness of a lumbo-pelvic monitor and feedback device to change postural behavior: a feasibility randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2014;44(9):702-711.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.